<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>http://www.82games.com/0708/07DEN7A.HTM See the bottom of the page, "hands rating"</div> http://www.82games.com/0708/07SAS20A.HTM JR Smith has a higher bball IQ than Tim Duncan!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>http://www.82games.com/0708/07DEN7A.HTM See the bottom of the page, "hands rating"</div> http://www.82games.com/0708/07SAS20A.HTM JR Smith has a higher bball IQ than Tim Duncan! </div> Or maybe you really underestimate (with your eyes, no less) how good Smith is. You might consider they play different positions, too. Duncan's hands rating is probably very good compared to other centers or PFs.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 4 2008, 11:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Aug 4 2008, 08:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm now dumber for reading this stuff Nash's BBall IQ didn't go up when he went to PHX. He was the same heady player that he was in college. PER has absolutely nothing to do with BBall IQ. Any attempted inference relating the two is moronic. JR Smith has a low BBall IQ. His decision making is getting better, but he is still dumb on the court. Bogut has a very high BBall IQ.</div> I appreciate your opinions. Do they have some standardized BBall IQ test that I missed seeing the scores from? </div> Similar to Real Estate: Observation, observation, observation BBall IQ is another way of talking about how good of a decision maker is on the court. No site charts that (although teams do)
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>http://www.82games.com/0708/07DEN7A.HTM See the bottom of the page, "hands rating"</div> http://www.82games.com/0708/07SAS20A.HTM JR Smith has a higher bball IQ than Tim Duncan! </div> Or maybe you really underestimate (with your eyes, no less) how good Smith is. </div> Try to stay on topic. This isn't about how good JR Smith is. It's about his bball IQ.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>http://www.82games.com/0708/07DEN7A.HTM See the bottom of the page, "hands rating"</div> http://www.82games.com/0708/07SAS20A.HTM JR Smith has a higher bball IQ than Tim Duncan! </div> Or maybe you really underestimate (with your eyes, no less) how good Smith is. </div> Try to stay on topic. This isn't about how good JR Smith is. It's about his bball IQ. </div> You have YOUR OPINION. I have mine. Since there is no standardized bball IQ test, the stats I've brought up are the only OBJECTIVE (subjective means opinion) means to measure these things. If a guy makes 10 bad decisions a game and scores 100 PPG by himself and his team wins by an average of 50, what's his IQ?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>http://www.82games.com/0708/07DEN7A.HTM See the bottom of the page, "hands rating"</div> Not all bad decisions end up in turnovers. Stats never tell the entire story and are often misinterpreted. Which is what is happening here. I'll try to find the quote later, but during the season, George Karl was asked about playing JR Smith some minutes at PG and he essentially replied why would I play the worst decision maker on the team at PG.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>You have YOUR OPINION. I have mine. Since there is no standardized bball IQ test, the stats I've brought up are the only OBJECTIVE (subjective means opinion) means to measure these things.</div> Don't patronize me. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>If a guy makes 10 bad decisions a game and scores 100 PPG by himself and his team wins by an average of 50, what's his IQ?</div> Let me get my calculator out.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Since there is no standardized bball IQ test, the stats I've brought up are the only OBJECTIVE (subjective means opinion) means to measure these things.</div> Yes, stats do measure some things. However, stats fail to provide a logical basis when they are used to describe things that they don't actually measure. BBall IQ is purely based upon observation.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Aug 4 2008, 09:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>http://www.82games.com/0708/07DEN7A.HTM See the bottom of the page, "hands rating"</div> Not all bad decisions end up in turnovers. Stats never tell the entire story and are often misinterpreted. Which is what is happening here. I'll try to find the quote later, but during the season, George Karl was asked about playing JR Smith some minutes at PG and he essentially replied why would I play the worst decision maker on the team at PG. </div> OK, so take a guess (that's the best you can do) as to how many bad decisions didn't turn into turnovers... Why would Karl play a really tall guy who's pure SG at PG?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>http://www.82games.com/0708/07DEN7A.HTM See the bottom of the page, "hands rating"</div> http://www.82games.com/0708/07SAS20A.HTM JR Smith has a higher bball IQ than Tim Duncan! </div> Or maybe you really underestimate (with your eyes, no less) how good Smith is. </div> Try to stay on topic. This isn't about how good JR Smith is. It's about his bball IQ. </div> You have YOUR OPINION. I have mine. Since there is no standardized bball IQ test, the stats I've brought up are the only OBJECTIVE (subjective means opinion) means to measure these things. If a guy makes 10 bad decisions a game and scores 100 PPG by himself and his team wins by an average of 50, what's his IQ? </div> Here's what you're missing. You're praising objectivity by using a stat that monitors aspects of the game that describe what people refer to as intelligence. However is intelligence, awareness, and any mental influence on the game measured in exactly the 'hands rating?' So it's not objective. You have your opinion (opinion means subjective) that these stats (and god knows how intelligence can be summed up exactly in a 3 digit number) accurately and precisely represent the subject manner. Another opinion is that JR Smith is not as an intelligent player as Tim Duncan. Two opinions.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Aug 4 2008, 09:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>http://www.82games.com/0708/07DEN7A.HTM See the bottom of the page, "hands rating"</div> http://www.82games.com/0708/07SAS20A.HTM JR Smith has a higher bball IQ than Tim Duncan! </div> Or maybe you really underestimate (with your eyes, no less) how good Smith is. </div> Try to stay on topic. This isn't about how good JR Smith is. It's about his bball IQ. </div> You have YOUR OPINION. I have mine. Since there is no standardized bball IQ test, the stats I've brought up are the only OBJECTIVE (subjective means opinion) means to measure these things. If a guy makes 10 bad decisions a game and scores 100 PPG by himself and his team wins by an average of 50, what's his IQ? </div> Here's what you're missing. You're praising objectivity by using a stat that monitors aspects of the game that describe what people refer to as intelligence. However is intelligence, awareness, and any mental influence on the game measured in exactly the 'hands rating?' So it's not objective. You have your opinion (opinion means subjective) that these stats (and god knows how intelligence can be summed up exactly in a 3 digit number) accurately and precisely represent the subject manner. Another opinion is that JR Smith is not as an intelligent player as Tim Duncan. Two opinions. </div> I'm not missing a thing. I don't take any one stat to be the be-all/end-all. Filling out the stat sheet is the phrase I used. I don't see how a guy can fill it out like Smith does and not have this mythical IQ. It's not like he's a one-dimensional player. All the stats point to him being a better player than the guys he played against. If this isn't a measure of IQ (he's better than opposing players), then what is?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Aug 4 2008, 09:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>http://www.82games.com/0708/07DEN7A.HTM See the bottom of the page, "hands rating"</div> http://www.82games.com/0708/07SAS20A.HTM JR Smith has a higher bball IQ than Tim Duncan! </div> Or maybe you really underestimate (with your eyes, no less) how good Smith is. </div> Try to stay on topic. This isn't about how good JR Smith is. It's about his bball IQ. </div> You have YOUR OPINION. I have mine. Since there is no standardized bball IQ test, the stats I've brought up are the only OBJECTIVE (subjective means opinion) means to measure these things. If a guy makes 10 bad decisions a game and scores 100 PPG by himself and his team wins by an average of 50, what's his IQ? </div> Here's what you're missing. You're praising objectivity by using a stat that monitors aspects of the game that describe what people refer to as intelligence. However is intelligence, awareness, and any mental influence on the game measured in exactly the 'hands rating?' So it's not objective. You have your opinion (opinion means subjective) that these stats (and god knows how intelligence can be summed up exactly in a 3 digit number) accurately and precisely represent the subject manner. Another opinion is that JR Smith is not as an intelligent player as Tim Duncan. Two opinions. </div> I'm not missing a thing. I don't take any one stat to be the be-all/end-all. Filling out the stat sheet is the phrase I used. I don't see how a guy can fill it out like Smith does and not have this mythical IQ. It's not like he's a one-dimensional player. All the stats point to him being a better player than the guys he played against. If this isn't a measure of IQ (he's better than opposing players), then what is? </div> So your example is infallible because you cannot think of any other option? Sounds like a self-affirming bias to me. All I wanted to do was remind people that throwing out statistics doesn't necessarily mean that you have proof, it is merely support. edit: and therefore really no better than the 2nd hand accounts given by other posters. Plus, "hands rating?" c'mon now (just thought I should make that explicit)
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Aug 4 2008, 09:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Aug 4 2008, 09:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>http://www.82games.com/0708/07DEN7A.HTM See the bottom of the page, "hands rating"</div> http://www.82games.com/0708/07SAS20A.HTM JR Smith has a higher bball IQ than Tim Duncan! </div> Or maybe you really underestimate (with your eyes, no less) how good Smith is. </div> Try to stay on topic. This isn't about how good JR Smith is. It's about his bball IQ. </div> You have YOUR OPINION. I have mine. Since there is no standardized bball IQ test, the stats I've brought up are the only OBJECTIVE (subjective means opinion) means to measure these things. If a guy makes 10 bad decisions a game and scores 100 PPG by himself and his team wins by an average of 50, what's his IQ? </div> Here's what you're missing. You're praising objectivity by using a stat that monitors aspects of the game that describe what people refer to as intelligence. However is intelligence, awareness, and any mental influence on the game measured in exactly the 'hands rating?' So it's not objective. You have your opinion (opinion means subjective) that these stats (and god knows how intelligence can be summed up exactly in a 3 digit number) accurately and precisely represent the subject manner. Another opinion is that JR Smith is not as an intelligent player as Tim Duncan. Two opinions. </div> I'm not missing a thing. I don't take any one stat to be the be-all/end-all. Filling out the stat sheet is the phrase I used. I don't see how a guy can fill it out like Smith does and not have this mythical IQ. It's not like he's a one-dimensional player. All the stats point to him being a better player than the guys he played against. If this isn't a measure of IQ (he's better than opposing players), then what is? </div> So your example is infallible because you cannot think of any other option? Sounds like a self-affirming bias to me. All I wanted to do was remind people that throwing out statistics doesn't necessarily mean that you have proof, it is merely support. </div> I do know of another option. I already mentioned the sphincter test, but there's another form of that that's much more reliable than one man's opinion. I'll let you guess what it is.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:37 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Aug 4 2008, 09:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Aug 4 2008, 09:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>http://www.82games.com/0708/07DEN7A.HTM See the bottom of the page, "hands rating"</div> http://www.82games.com/0708/07SAS20A.HTM JR Smith has a higher bball IQ than Tim Duncan! </div> Or maybe you really underestimate (with your eyes, no less) how good Smith is. </div> Try to stay on topic. This isn't about how good JR Smith is. It's about his bball IQ. </div> You have YOUR OPINION. I have mine. Since there is no standardized bball IQ test, the stats I've brought up are the only OBJECTIVE (subjective means opinion) means to measure these things. If a guy makes 10 bad decisions a game and scores 100 PPG by himself and his team wins by an average of 50, what's his IQ? </div> Here's what you're missing. You're praising objectivity by using a stat that monitors aspects of the game that describe what people refer to as intelligence. However is intelligence, awareness, and any mental influence on the game measured in exactly the 'hands rating?' So it's not objective. You have your opinion (opinion means subjective) that these stats (and god knows how intelligence can be summed up exactly in a 3 digit number) accurately and precisely represent the subject manner. Another opinion is that JR Smith is not as an intelligent player as Tim Duncan. Two opinions. </div> I'm not missing a thing. I don't take any one stat to be the be-all/end-all. Filling out the stat sheet is the phrase I used. I don't see how a guy can fill it out like Smith does and not have this mythical IQ. It's not like he's a one-dimensional player. All the stats point to him being a better player than the guys he played against. If this isn't a measure of IQ (he's better than opposing players), then what is? </div> So your example is infallible because you cannot think of any other option? Sounds like a self-affirming bias to me. All I wanted to do was remind people that throwing out statistics doesn't necessarily mean that you have proof, it is merely support. </div> I do know of another option. I already mentioned the sphincter test, but there's another form of that that's much more reliable than one man's opinion. I'll let you guess what it is. </div> I'm not going to post your opinion for you; then I'd just be talking to myself. Why don't you tell me? By "more reliable" do you mean more reliable then the one you used to support your JR Smith opinion? (For the record I really like JR Smith as a player!)
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:37 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Aug 4 2008, 09:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga @ Aug 4 2008, 09:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 4 2008, 09:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>http://www.82games.com/0708/07DEN7A.HTM See the bottom of the page, "hands rating"</div> http://www.82games.com/0708/07SAS20A.HTM JR Smith has a higher bball IQ than Tim Duncan! </div> Or maybe you really underestimate (with your eyes, no less) how good Smith is. </div> Try to stay on topic. This isn't about how good JR Smith is. It's about his bball IQ. </div> You have YOUR OPINION. I have mine. Since there is no standardized bball IQ test, the stats I've brought up are the only OBJECTIVE (subjective means opinion) means to measure these things. If a guy makes 10 bad decisions a game and scores 100 PPG by himself and his team wins by an average of 50, what's his IQ? </div> Here's what you're missing. You're praising objectivity by using a stat that monitors aspects of the game that describe what people refer to as intelligence. However is intelligence, awareness, and any mental influence on the game measured in exactly the 'hands rating?' So it's not objective. You have your opinion (opinion means subjective) that these stats (and god knows how intelligence can be summed up exactly in a 3 digit number) accurately and precisely represent the subject manner. Another opinion is that JR Smith is not as an intelligent player as Tim Duncan. Two opinions. </div> I'm not missing a thing. I don't take any one stat to be the be-all/end-all. Filling out the stat sheet is the phrase I used. I don't see how a guy can fill it out like Smith does and not have this mythical IQ. It's not like he's a one-dimensional player. All the stats point to him being a better player than the guys he played against. If this isn't a measure of IQ (he's better than opposing players), then what is? </div> So your example is infallible because you cannot think of any other option? Sounds like a self-affirming bias to me. All I wanted to do was remind people that throwing out statistics doesn't necessarily mean that you have proof, it is merely support. </div> I do know of another option. I already mentioned the sphincter test, but there's another form of that that's much more reliable than one man's opinion. I'll let you guess what it is. </div> Just feel like adding this. Jason Collins: 3.4 7.5 for his career but collins net PER from the center position was -12.5, and from PF, -50, hmmm I guess the fundamental, defensive smart center is an idiot because his PER sucks.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:26 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Aug 4 2008, 09:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Aug 5 2008, 12:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>http://www.82games.com/0708/07DEN7A.HTM See the bottom of the page, "hands rating"</div> Not all bad decisions end up in turnovers. Stats never tell the entire story and are often misinterpreted. Which is what is happening here. I'll try to find the quote later, but during the season, George Karl was asked about playing JR Smith some minutes at PG and he essentially replied why would I play the worst decision maker on the team at PG. </div> OK, so take a guess (that's the best you can do) as to how many bad decisions didn't turn into turnovers... </div> At least 5 defensive lapses per game plus at least 4 missed cutters when he had the ball per game plus at least 2 missed gambles for steals plus .... <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Why would Karl play a really tall guy who's pure SG at PG?</div> Because AI isn't a PG and JR needed to get playing time.
How about a poll of 1M people? Next best thing would be a poll of the coaches. Next best would be a poll of all of S2. Next best thing would be a poll of those in the GM draft. The thing about polls is that the larger the sample, the more likely you are to consider all variables and the JR Smith "haters" would even out with the fans at the edges of the bell curve.
Man I've been around here pulling all nighters for the past week....at least 5 nights of staying up til 5 or 6AM Pacific Time so that I can see the early riser's picks on the east coast...and....it hasn't been this active til now. I love you guys.
