2008 GM Draft 1 Peer Evaluation Thread

Discussion in 'GM Draft 1' started by cpawfan, Aug 1, 2008.

  1. User01

    User01 GOAT

    Sessions is the best passer ever.
     
  2. Claud

    Claud Legendary

    Sessions was one of the three young guards I was considering when I selected Westbrook. Great pick imho.
    Ramon is certainly a good pass-first PG, But im not sure he should be your starting PG though.
     
  3. DynastYWarrioR6

    DynastYWarrioR6 JBB SmurfY

    I was hoping he would fall, so I could pick him up as a backup.
     
  4. User01

    User01 GOAT

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 09:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Sessions was one of the three young guards I was considering when I selected Westbrook. Great pick imho.
    Ramon is certainly a good pass-first PG, But im not sure he should be your starting PG though.</div>

    yeah, but I figure with Martin, Granger, Villanueva and Bynum, my point doesn't really need to score much, just be a capable passer, which Sessions definitely is. He'll also be great on the break, and this team should run a lot.
     
  5. Kid Chocolate

    Kid Chocolate Suspended

    I'm interested in seeing how Sessions does this year. He only played in 17 games last year. He started 7 games, and the Bucks lost every one. Hard to put a lot of stock in his numbers last year, IMO. But those assist numbers are mighty impressive, anyways.

    He's not a guy I would want leading a team at this point, I think.
     
  6. Claud

    Claud Legendary

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (User01 @ Aug 9 2008, 09:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 09:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Sessions was one of the three young guards I was considering when I selected Westbrook. Great pick imho.
    Ramon is certainly a good pass-first PG, But im not sure he should be your starting PG though.</div>

    yeah, but I figure with Martin, Granger, Villanueva and Bynum, my point doesn't really need to score much, just be a capable passer, which Sessions definitely is. He'll also be great on the break, and this team should run a lot.
    </div>

    Btw great trade deal you got man. Granger and 6th for Ellis and 9th?! Awesome.
    Ellis isnt really a PG anyway. Hes kinda like Brandon Roy at the 2 IMO.
     
  7. DynastYWarrioR6

    DynastYWarrioR6 JBB SmurfY

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 9 2008, 09:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm interested in seeing how Sessions does this year. He only played in 17 games last year. He started 7 games, and the Bucks lost every one. Hard to put a lot of stock in his numbers last year, IMO. But those assist numbers are mighty impressive, anyways.

    He's not a guy I would want leading a team at this point, I think.</div>

    That's why i hoped he would fall so I could use him as a backup...I think as a backup it wouldn't be asking for much, but would still allow him the time to prove himself and produce.
     
  8. JFizzleRaider

    JFizzleRaider Yeast Lords Global Moderator

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 06:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (User01 @ Aug 9 2008, 09:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 09:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Sessions was one of the three young guards I was considering when I selected Westbrook. Great pick imho.
    Ramon is certainly a good pass-first PG, But im not sure he should be your starting PG though.</div>

    yeah, but I figure with Martin, Granger, Villanueva and Bynum, my point doesn't really need to score much, just be a capable passer, which Sessions definitely is. He'll also be great on the break, and this team should run a lot.
    </div>

    Btw great trade deal you got man. Granger and 6th for Ellis and 9th?! Awesome.
    Ellis isnt really a PG anyway. Hes kinda like Brandon Roy at the 2 IMO.
    </div>

    Please don't compare Monta Ellis and Brandon Roy

    kthxbai
     
  9. Claud

    Claud Legendary

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JFizzleRaider @ Aug 10 2008, 12:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 06:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (User01 @ Aug 9 2008, 09:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 09:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Sessions was one of the three young guards I was considering when I selected Westbrook. Great pick imho.
    Ramon is certainly a good pass-first PG, But im not sure he should be your starting PG though.</div>

    yeah, but I figure with Martin, Granger, Villanueva and Bynum, my point doesn't really need to score much, just be a capable passer, which Sessions definitely is. He'll also be great on the break, and this team should run a lot.
    </div>

    Btw great trade deal you got man. Granger and 6th for Ellis and 9th?! Awesome.
    Ellis isnt really a PG anyway. Hes kinda like Brandon Roy at the 2 IMO.
    </div>

    Please don't compare Monta Ellis and Brandon Roy

    kthxbai
    </div>


    Why? They are both combo guards who cant run the point, and undersized for the SG position at 6'4 (Roy) and 6'3(Ellis). Can you tell me why they aren't comparable please?
     
  10. Kid Chocolate

    Kid Chocolate Suspended

    Brandon Roy is 3 inches taller than Monta Ellis.

    6-6 to 6-3.
     
  11. Claud

    Claud Legendary

    NO WAY in hell Roy is 6'6.

    But if he is I will now shut my mouth then.
     
  12. Kid Chocolate

    Kid Chocolate Suspended

  13. JFizzleRaider

    JFizzleRaider Yeast Lords Global Moderator

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 10 2008, 06:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JFizzleRaider @ Aug 10 2008, 12:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 06:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (User01 @ Aug 9 2008, 09:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 09:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Sessions was one of the three young guards I was considering when I selected Westbrook. Great pick imho.
    Ramon is certainly a good pass-first PG, But im not sure he should be your starting PG though.</div>

    yeah, but I figure with Martin, Granger, Villanueva and Bynum, my point doesn't really need to score much, just be a capable passer, which Sessions definitely is. He'll also be great on the break, and this team should run a lot.
    </div>

    Btw great trade deal you got man. Granger and 6th for Ellis and 9th?! Awesome.
    Ellis isnt really a PG anyway. Hes kinda like Brandon Roy at the 2 IMO.
    </div>

    Please don't compare Monta Ellis and Brandon Roy

    kthxbai
    </div>


    Why? They are both combo guards who cant run the point, and undersized for the SG position at 6'4 (Roy) and 6'3(Ellis). Can you tell me why they aren't comparable please?
    </div>

    Brandon Roy can run the point and will be doing so next year when Bayless is on the court with him.
     
  14. User01

    User01 GOAT

    Farmar will now start at point guard, I'll let Sessions develop a little bit, and Farmar will be a great sixth man in a couple years when Sessions takes over.
     
  15. danxcr

    danxcr Active Member

    i am actually excited how the blazers will pan out with bayless playin PG on the defense but the 2 on offense [​IMG]
     
  16. J_Ray

    J_Ray JBB JustBBall Member

    I think Martell Webster is a complete steal this far down in the draft, and he still has plenty of potential still to be fulfilled. He should be a great 6th man that can play SG or SF when Mike Miller or King James goes out.
     
  17. Kid Chocolate

    Kid Chocolate Suspended

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (J_Ray @ Aug 10 2008, 11:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I think Martell Webster is a complete steal this far down in the draft, and he still has plenty of potential still to be fulfilled. He should be a great 6th man that can play SG or SF when Mike Miller or King James goes out.</div>

    He's a solid pick. I don't know about complete steal. Where do you think he should have went/who do you think he should have gone over?
     
  18. lukewarmplay

    lukewarmplay Hired Goons

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (J_Ray @ Aug 10 2008, 11:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I think Martell Webster is a complete steal this far down in the draft, and he still has plenty of potential still to be fulfilled. He should be a great 6th man that can play SG or SF when Mike Miller or King James goes out.</div>

    Considering that he fights with Outlaw for floor time, that either says something about where he got picked or where Outlaw got picked.
     
  19. JFizzleRaider

    JFizzleRaider Yeast Lords Global Moderator

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (lukewarmplay @ Aug 10 2008, 08:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (J_Ray @ Aug 10 2008, 11:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I think Martell Webster is a complete steal this far down in the draft, and he still has plenty of potential still to be fulfilled. He should be a great 6th man that can play SG or SF when Mike Miller or King James goes out.</div>

    Considering that he fights with Outlaw for floor time, that either says something about where he got picked or where Outlaw got picked.
    </div>

    Outlaw is the better individual player, it's just that he can't play within and team and contribute in other ways than scoring as well as Webster can.

    With that said, I think Webster was a good pick, not a steal at this point.

    Gomes got taken in the same area and I think both of them are similar level players.
     
  20. CelticKing

    CelticKing The Green Monster

    Ok starting lineup finally complete for the Lakers

    PG: Derek Fisher, SG: Dwayne Wade, SF: Jamario Moon, PF: Lamar Odom, CE: Tyson Chandler

    Bench: Eddie House
     

Share This Page