Well, it looks like there will continue to be a market for your Hillary hate material for the next several years, so get to work on more clever names for her. barfo
Color me not at all concerned. How's your Johnson? Seems like he just can't get it up for the debates. barfo
I've been gone this summer, and I skipped the conventions. So I'll read this thread to find out who's going to win.
Just ask her out on a date already, sheesh! I can't explain to you (since you have your tongue in her mouth) ;-) , the complete and utter bullshit being able to feed questions to your interviewer is, when it comes to people being murdered and her being responsible in that.
Johnson's chances are bad enough with the two parties deciding who gets into the debates. You're a fool who wants them to decide who gets to spend money on campaigns, too.
You can't explain to me because you apparently don't understand the way congressional hearings work. It's ok to hear both sides of the story. It's not some sort of constitutional violation for Democrats to allow her to say what she wants to say, in addition to answering the questions the Republicans want to ask her. barfo
Nothing prevented any senator from asking any question that they wanted to. You look so desperate trying to find something, anything, you can pin on Hillary. If Hillary wears open-toed shoes you'd probably claim they were 'scandals'. Hey, there's another one for your bumper-sticker business... barfo
I don't think the idea was for him to ask the questions he wanted to. He wants to keep his position on his committees and to keep getting funds from the DNC for his reelection. We know how the DNC works, thanks to WikiLeaks.
They came from Wikileaks via Seth Rich, a DNC staffer who was murdered shortly after the leak was published.
Right... so we are supposed to believe that if it weren't for pressure from the DNC, he would have been, what, much tougher on her than the republicans on the panel? Or have you forgotten that there are republicans on the panel? Or do you think they too bow down to the DNC? You are complaining that the hearing wasn't sufficiently one-sided. That's pretty silly, frankly. barfo
I believe what the emails say. If it were democrats running things, there would be no oversight at all. Saw that in the early Obama years.