<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (teeps11 @ Jan 4 2007, 09:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>PacersFan has done it again. He completely got us off topic from 6th man of the year to can the Suns create shots for themselves, which is completely retarded because of course they can.</div>see once again it's not my fault. I posted something tony thought was controversial, some people started spamming by calling me idiots. tony responded because he didn't agree. we had an argument. how is it my fault? tony wanted to know why I thought what I did.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (iversonfan268 @ Jan 4 2007, 09:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Dude Amare was only in his 2nd season in the NBA before Nash came. He was 21 years old and still getting better. He had no true PG to dish it down to him. Of course he's gonna ahve higher shot attempts. The next season he just broke out. Yes Nash was a part of it but it doesn't mean he was the only reason for it. Do you think if that you have a true PG like Nash who makes the plays that means the other players can't create for themselves or something? You make no sense at all. Liek Balla already said the most points combined Nash can account for is 33 of the players points. Whata bout the other 70 points? I mean god damn just watch the Suns and stop being and Steve Nash's dick.</div>I never said that they don't I just said that they're not good at it. do you realize how many Nash passes lead to freethrows?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (iversonfan268 @ Jan 4 2007, 07:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Dude Amare was only in his 2nd season in the NBA before Nash came. He was 21 years old and still getting better. He had no true PG to dish it down to him. Of course he's gonna ahve higher shot attempts. The next season he just broke out. Yes Nash was a part of it but it doesn't mean he was the only reason for it. Do you think if that you have a true PG like Nash who makes the plays that means the other players can't create for themselves or something? You make no sense at all. Liek Balla already said the most points combined Nash can account for is 33 of the players points. Whata bout the other 70 points? I mean god damn just watch the Suns and stop being and Steve Nash's dick.</div>Valo said that and I repeated what he said here. :happy0144: Just giving credit where it's due for a pretty good point.As for PacersFan, I'm going to follow what BCB did and ignore him and hopefully he'll be gone soon.
Still a bit early, but my vote would go for David Lee. Only reason we actually HAVE SOME WINS this year....
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ASUFan22 @ Jan 4 2007, 10:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>As for PacersFan, I'm going to follow what BCB did and ignore him and hopefully he'll be gone soon.</div>lol, but he actually read my posts so he's not ignoring me
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pacers fan forever @ Jan 4 2007, 08:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>lol, but he actually read my posts so he's not ignoring me</div>What?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ASUFan22 @ Jan 4 2007, 10:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>What? </div>he says he's ignoring me but he's reading my posts.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pacers fan forever @ Jan 4 2007, 06:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I never said that they don't I just said that they're not good at it. do you realize how many Nash passes lead to freethrows?</div>The Suns make an average of 19 per game. That means still the maximum amount of points Nash can be responsible for is 52 points. You still have a little less than 60 a game to account for.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>The Suns make an average of 19 per game. That means still the maximum amount of points Nash can be responsible for is 52 points. You still have a little less than 60 a game to account for.</div>Very good point. According to PacersFan, Nash is the whole team but like you said even with his good games there is still over half the team's points to be accounted for.
