<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>I am making a fair point your blind to see that a gm could have traded for a super star for #1 pick depends how exactly that gm viewed Iverson.</div>Fair point means no bias, strike one. And how the gm views Iverson, well you perceive him as God, so strike two.Strike three is just being Serge.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (coyn3burglar @ Apr 21 2007, 10:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>That would be pretty cool if we had Jordan. Who knows what would have happened to our franchise. Championships galore? Maybe.If we did have Jordan there is no possible way for us to actually obtain Iverson in that 1996 Draft. Iverson was considered to be a sure impact player right out of college with superstar potential. Theres no way in hell I would have let the number one pick go for a Star Veteran retiring in a couple years. Don't think Jordan and AI would work even if it was possible. The two highest scoring guards in NBA history, I doubt they would click. AI had personality problems, like BigMo said, it was just WW3 waiting to happen.</div>And it still be possible to get the #1 pick how can you say it' not be possible. You had out side Jordan one of the top players in the league it was VERY POSSIBLE.And haha Yeah sure they are not stars cause they can't adjust they would adjust that everyone who says 2 stars can't get it done is a joke AI+Melo showed that already, and will keep showing it even more next season.I am done
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Rok @ Apr 21 2007, 11:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Fair point means no bias, strike one. And how the gm views Iverson, well you perceive him as God, so strike two.Strike three is just being Serge.</div>I am not bias I said it was possible to get AI while having Jordan and it was deff POSSIBLE. And Iverson is one of the best to ever play this game he is no Jordan, but he is one of the best to play this game.And your a loser get a life someone does not agree you get your panties in a bunch.
You know there's a button called Edit. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>And your a loser get a life someone does not agree you get your panties in a bunch.</div>That makes sense when I'm the one who uses the f word and insults when someone does not agree.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Serge @ Apr 21 2007, 10:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I am not bias I said it was possible to get AI while having Jordan and it was deff POSSIBLE. And Iverson is one of the best to ever play this game he is no Jordan, but he is one of the best to play this game.And your a loser get a life someone does not agree you get your panties in a bunch.</div>You're not a biased homer? Yeah, sure... and Louis Williams is apparently the greatest point guard of all-time, right?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BigMo763 @ Apr 22 2007, 03:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>You're not a biased homer? Yeah, sure... and Louis Williams is apparently the greatest point guard of all-time, right?</div>No I am not biast I call AI out when he does not do good. Like all the time he was having bad turnover nights even while scoring a lot, and giving assists I called him out. I be like great night 34/10 bla bla bla but sucked at turnovers AWFUL he had so and so many turnovers bla bla bla. When he strugled from the line I also said something. I called AI out also I don't just praise him so don't call me a homer/bias.And Williams is not the greatest PG or even great. But he deff good enough to be a pretty good starter in this league. He can really be good unlike what you think.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BigMo763 @ Apr 22 2007, 04:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Everybody on BBW knows you are a homer/bandwagon fan.</div>OMG your really getting anoying man.Okay why am I a homer/bandwagon fan?I am still a Sixers fan that is my #1 team. Just cause I follow AI half the Philly fans who been watching him for years like me are following AI still and cheering him on to win a title cause he deserves one nothing wrong with that at all.I went to NJ for Nets when they played Denver March 20 I saw 2 people who are Sixers season ticket holder that I knew from here by going to games and seeing them there and got to know them. And I am not even going to think about how many more Sixers fans came up to cheer Iverson on. Half they fans at that games was there to watch, and cheer AI on and half them were Sixers fan probably at that game not just people living in NJ who like AI. Just cause I follow AI, and want him to win a title don't mean I am a bandwagoner and not a Sixers fan.I will always be a Sixers fan.
Whatever... all you do is bash the Sixers, showing absolutely zero confidence in them. Meanwhile you're calling Denver "we" and "us," etc. Screw that sh*t... we all are following Iverson and want to see him win a ring, but you're the only one that has pretty much adopted Denver as your new favorite team. The way I see it, this is how you're allegiance flows:1. Iverson2. Denver...5. PhiladelphiaAnd yes, you are a homer. You have never made a good point or anything. All you say is "Omgzorz Iverson is the greatest, nuggets pwn, dallas sucks, phx is old, denver will be best team inl eague next yr!!!!#!!@!@!@!! ad;kadfj"I know you must be annoyed by hearing that and don't believe me since you consider yourself "a top poster on this board," but like I said, go make a topic and ask what people here think of you and you'll see what I'm saying.
Plus if this had happened, would Charles Barkley have stayed with Chicago? And would he have gotten to the Suns and done the finals run and won MVP? Likely not. As I said before it's pointless to try and even comprehend what the NBA would be like had this gone down. There are so man chain reactions, minor and major, that it'd be impossible to predict the state of the NBA now.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BigMo763 @ Apr 22 2007, 02:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Whatever... all you do is bash the Sixers, showing absolutely zero confidence in them. Meanwhile you're calling Denver "we" and "us," etc. Screw that sh*t... we all are following Iverson and want to see him win a ring, but you're the only one that has pretty much adopted Denver as your new favorite team. The way I see it, this is how you're allegiance flows:1. Iverson2. Denver...5. PhiladelphiaAnd yes, you are a homer. You have never made a good point or anything. All you say is "Omgzorz Iverson is the greatest, nuggets pwn, dallas sucks, phx is old, denver will be best team inl eague next yr!!!!#!!@!@!@!! ad;kadfj"I know you must be annoyed by hearing that and don't believe me since you consider yourself "a top poster on this board," but like I said, go make a topic and ask what people here think of you and you'll see what I'm saying.</div>Dude I am being real I don't go over hyping the team due to them winning more then they should have. And I am cheering for Denver cause of AI. And I like Melo also, but I would not be cheering for them with out AI being there don't mean they are my fav team.1. Sixers1. AI4. Kobe5. T-Mac6. Melo7. Lakers7A. Rockets8. Denver :HAHAHA: All thats stuff you just said I never said so might wanna learn how to read. Iverson is great nothing wrong with that, and I also do call him out when he get's to many turnovers or misses to many free throws. Dallas I never said suck. Never said Suns are old I said Spurs are, and well that is true. And I never said Denver be the best next year I said they be up there with Dallas/Suns at the top and that is true.I am not gonna make a topic asking a question like that it's just stupid I am a good poster here though.
Whatever, keep thinking that you're a top poster here or that you know what you're talking about, because quite frankly everybody else looks at you in exactly the opposite way.I think you should be the one who needs to learn how to read.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BigMo763 @ Apr 23 2007, 03:01 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Whatever, keep thinking that you're a top poster here or that you know what you're talking about, because quite frankly everybody else looks at you in exactly the opposite way.I think you should be the one who needs to learn how to read.</div>Atleast I don't read one thing then say false info by saying I said something I never said.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Serge @ Apr 23 2007, 02:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Atleast I don't read one thing then say false info by saying I said something I never said.</div>Um, really? Your the one who in one post said Andre Miller has done nothing to help the progression of the 76ers young players, and then in another said that Andre Miller did help the young players progress and is the reason Louis Williams isn't getting playing time.You're the one who said Louis Williams could be a starter on a championship team, yet later said you never said that.You're the one who said that Dallas and PHX suck, and that the Spurs are too old, and that the Nuggets would be the best team in the league next year, yet later denied you said that.You're the one who said that the vehemently believed the Nuggets could trade Kenyon Martin for a star big man, yet later said they could only trade him if they don't ask for too much.Must I continue?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BigMo763 @ Apr 22 2007, 03:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Everybody on BBW knows you are a homer/bandwagon fan.</div>Amen 2 that :happy0144: uh I got nothing against Serge, your probley a great person.. but you have to make your mind up with what the hell you really support.sure you can support Iverson but it seems that you support denver and iverson so so much more than philly altogether, personally it kind of gets on my nerves because it's obvious when people read your post's in this forum or in the nuggets forum, we don't know what to believe because your not being true to the team in a way, if you know what I mean.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Serge @ Apr 13 2007, 05:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Sixers suck and won win a title for another 10 years. So it's not like I am cheering for Denver to win the title over the Sixers.</div>Im sure you mean won't .. lol, great spirit. Also it is like your cheering for denver to win a title over the sixers, your supporting them now to win a nba championship arn't u?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Serge @ Apr 21 2007, 11:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>And it still be possible to get the #1 pick how can you say it' not be possible. You had out side Jordan one of the top players in the league it was VERY POSSIBLE.And haha Yeah sure they are not stars cause they can't adjust they would adjust that everyone who says 2 stars can't get it done is a joke AI+Melo showed that already, and will keep showing it even more next season.I am done</div>Outside Jordan who would we trade for a number one overall pick. That person better be damn good.Except melo is not a guard. MJ and Iverson are essentially two SG's, while Melo is a SF/PF. The reason it works partially is because they have Steve Blake at the reigns distributing the ball very well with Melo getting a lot of his shots on put backs missed by Iverson.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BigMo763 @ Apr 23 2007, 04:18 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Um, really? Your the one who in one post said Andre Miller has done nothing to help the progression of the 76ers young players, and then in another said that Andre Miller did help the young players progress and is the reason Louis Williams isn't getting playing time.You're the one who said Louis Williams could be a starter on a championship team, yet later said you never said that.You're the one who said that Dallas and PHX suck, and that the Spurs are too old, and that the Nuggets would be the best team in the league next year, yet later denied you said that.You're the one who said that the vehemently believed the Nuggets could trade Kenyon Martin for a star big man, yet later said they could only trade him if they don't ask for too much.Must I continue?</div>Umm no if you read again I said Miller helped the younger guys just not AS MUCH as some think. And that it also hurts us due to DRAFT. And yes he is the reason Williams did not get time, but that seprate as to why Williams has yet to show his full potential I was talking about. I was saying he could not start cause Mill was here that was why he did not get consistent minutes that was a diff thing. I did agree Miller helped young guys I just said it was not as much as some though that's all. And he hurt our draft position I said.Cause I never said title team if you read back I just said Williams is a starter that was all were did I said title team? Point out to me were I said on a title team? And I am not saying he be a super star, or a star on a title team or any team, but he can be a STARTER that is all I said. Can he start on a title team once he grooms I think yes he shown some flashes of being a starter. But he WON'T be a STAR that was not what I said I said he will be a STARTER that's all I said.Again I said Denver will be one of the top team up there with Dallas/Suns I never said they be better/worse then them. I said: "Next year Denver is a true contender will be up there with the best. Only team that be better/same be Dallas/Suns" And that we be on the SAME level as them never said better. Spurs by next year will be to old this year is there last year to win it all I think. You could see against Denver first game Duncan/Parker/Manu strugled yes big reason for the lost. BUT you could also see Denver have just more energy jumping for the ball, and hustling more then Spurs, and there age comes into it like I been saying for NEXT YEAR.I said they can trade Camby+First maybe for guy like JO/Pau they tryed atleast.Martin again I never said a star I said. "Not like I am saying for a great player just something we can get for him though" Meaning we should not just let him go for free.Please go back and re read cause you miss understood everything I have said. Or maybe miss read w/e the case is everything you said I never said.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Amare320 @ Apr 23 2007, 04:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Amen 2 that :happy0144: uh I got nothing against Serge, your probley a great person.. but you have to make your mind up with what the hell you really support.sure you can support Iverson but it seems that you support denver and iverson so so much more than philly altogether, personally it kind of gets on my nerves because it's obvious when people read your post's in this forum or in the nuggets forum, we don't know what to believe because your not being true to the team in a way, if you know what I mean.Im sure you mean won't .. lol, great spirit. Also it is like your cheering for denver to win a title over the sixers, your supporting them now to win a nba championship arn't u?</div>How am I not true to a team? Just cause I see we suck I am not being true to my team? WTF am I suppost to say ow ya were good were fine everything is great? Like WTF you want me to say just cause I am being real I all the sudden don't support my team? Yeah that is why I am a Sixers season ticket holder and waste my money for not supporting my team Yeah that makes sence. And yes I am cheering for Denver to win a title cause I want AI to win it, and they can they are close they are contenders. Sixers are no were near that and would not be for atleast 5 years even with Oden/Durant if they would have gotten them. AI be out of the league when Sixers can contend again. We can't win a title so how am I cheering for Denver to win it over the Sixers?Those who want AI to win a title are also cheering for Denver right now. If you want AI to win a title your cheering for Denver to win the title also right now, or sometimes soon since this year it's hard with there low seat.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (coyn3burglar @ Apr 23 2007, 10:26 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Outside Jordan who would we trade for a number one overall pick. That person better be damn good.Except melo is not a guard. MJ and Iverson are essentially two SG's, while Melo is a SF/PF. The reason it works partially is because they have Steve Blake at the reigns distributing the ball very well with Melo getting a lot of his shots on put backs missed by Iverson.</div>Blake is actually holding them back even though he is good. AI should be running the PG he is getting 7 assists at SG if he was let play PG consistent he would put up 9 assists a game next season. After game yesterday Magic Johnson I think said AI is a very underrated passer and I been saying that for ever, and I would trust what Magic says.Melo yes get's a lot of put backs, but AI been shooting a consistent 45% in Denver. So AI is not missing shots like he was in Philly he shooting like 17 shots a game 7 less not sure, but he deff shooting better at 45% in Denver. So Melo does not have as many put backs thru AI's misses. And AI passes down to him more then he should you have Melo forcing some of those shots he probably should not. Yet he shoots a pretty good % I think if he would not force a lot of those shots when he does not need to with AI, Nene, KL, JR, ect............. He could be at VERY HIGH shooting % not just good but very good if he just not force some shots like he does.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>anyways, bowie was the crappiest draft selection ever, and its good that chicago denied that trade offer. I wonder how much things would have changed by now if that trade actually happened tho.</div><span style="font-family:Arial">I disagree, I made a post about this topic awhile back. I don't think it was a stupid idea to draft Sam Bowie. Bowie had a similar college career to Jordan's. The Blazers picked according to there needs, at the time they needed a center. Mychal Thompson was good but they knew he would have been a better fit at power forward (which he was) The one strong spot the Blazers did have on their roster was shooting guards, which is why they may have passed up on Michael Jordan. They had Jim Paxson, Clyde Drexler, and they had star small forward Kiki Vandeweghe who could play shooting guard well. Therefore, they had no need for another shooting guard on the roster. In the 80's it was obvious that you needed a good center to win a championship. Bowie was a good center with a nice jump shot and rare passing ability for his size, those type of big men were not around back then. If they would have drafted Jordan before anybody knew how there NBA careers would turn out, people would have wondered what the Blazers were thinking drafting another shooting guard.</span>
Serge, go re-read your last 50-60 posts, and you'll realize how stupid your last post was. I'm done with your retarded opinions. Have fun being a "top poster" here. :HAHAHA:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BigMo763 @ Apr 23 2007, 04:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Serge, go re-read your last 50-60 posts, and you'll realize how stupid your last post was. I'm done with your retarded opinions. Have fun being a "top poster" here. :HAHAHA:</div>You have yet to show me were I said what you be saying I said. SHOW ME? Exactly you can't I never said anything you been saying I said. I never said Denver will be the best team next year I said they be up there with the best in Dallas/Suns. You are trying to put words in my mouth, and I am tired of it. You miss read my posts, or trying to bait me. But I never said what you being saying I said. If I have SHOW ME.I don't expect you to show me cause what you said I was saying I was not saying you twisted it around.
