You know if you take that Albatross around his neck which is AKA "His first season coaching here", his record isn't that bad. I am not a Nate fan, just stating the facts.
If we're talking record, though, I think a more relevant stat would be: Blazers 1-0 with Miller starting in a non-three-guard line-up. Perfect so far!
Then why judge any coach by their record, when it ha more to do with the players? What's the point of mocking his record, but then say the wins are all a product of a top 10 player. If that's the case, let's knock Phil Jackson down a few pegs, since he's always had a top 2 or 3 player on his team. That's ridiculous.
whats the record against those 2 out of curiousity? I am not asking to call you out. I actually am curious.
win against the spurs, loss to the hawks. 8-2 obviously is a nice record, but i think the competition does need to be taken into account as well.