<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Mar 21 2007, 03:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Mar 20 2007, 06:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>My projected stats for AA: 130 tackles, 6 sacks, 2 INT</div>Considering he's never had 130 Tackles, 6 Sacks, or 2 INT's in any given year of his career so far, what exactly makes you think he will put up all 3 in one season. Cmon, be realistic. </div>He was on pace for over 140 tackles in Washington. And even I could get 6 sacks and 2 INTs in Chicago...
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Mar 21 2007, 06:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>He was on pace for over 140 tackles in Washington. And even I could get 6 sacks and 2 INTs in Chicago...</div>this is true.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (.KCX @ Mar 21 2007, 08:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Mar 21 2007, 06:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>He was on pace for over 140 tackles in Washington. And even I could get 6 sacks and 2 INTs in Chicago...</div>this is true.</div>I'm not sure about the sacks from the secondary. The line gets most of them. Urlacher ain't got no sack for 20 something games
Yea, bullshit. Any dumbass people saying Archuleta has a chance of 100 tackles needs to stop talking. He has a slim chance of starting, he's never hit a Pro Bowl appearance, he rode the bench all year in Washington, and in St. Louis he wasn't a standout player. What in the world makes you think that he can stand out with a defense already in perfect shape? He hasn't set foot on the field with them yet most likely, and who even says he will be on the team come opening week. If he isn't cut because of his shit contract, he's for depth.
