Aldridge: Power Forward or Center

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by PtldPlatypus, Jan 18, 2011.

?

Aldridge: Power Forward or Center

  1. Power Forward

    55.6%
  2. Center

    44.4%
  1. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Buck played at the end of an era. I am not so sure how Buck would do in an era where most PF are 6'11 and some are even 7 feet tall. During his day, most were 6'8"'ish.

    That being said, I wish Dante's only problem was weight, but it's not.
     
  2. BlazerCaravan

    BlazerCaravan Hug a Bigot... to Death

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    28,071
    Likes Received:
    10,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's true... 20 years ago, Dante would be a poor man's Detlef Schremph or Buck Williams lite; today he's a second rounder scraping by. And Buck might not be half the player today that he was in 1986.

    I don't know who I would put at PF next to Aldridge, at least that we could get. Really, on offense, LMA is always the center, no matter who is actually playing C. Joel is a banging PF with LMA in the game; Camby is a stretch 4 with passing ability. If the only definition is height, then they are centers, but LMA has been our true Center since 12/17.
     
  3. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I said center but I don't really care much what label you put on him. He's capable of defending either position, he's showing a go-to scorer's mentality in the paint and whomever you pair him up with needs a similar build and/or ability to operate in either position -- Camby Junior (Randolph) could work because of his length and raw shot blocking ability, or maybe there's some PF-C in the draft (Enes Kanter would be my pipe dream) to match up with him.

    Beyond finding a more reliable and younger replacement for Camby, I'd still try to maybe keep Oden around and hope that the 25 games a year that he's healthy coincide with the playoffs, so you have a really big body to throw in the middle for those times that you really need some beef and to eat up space, but I think the NBA is definitely trending towards more mobile, agile and versatile centers and having a guy like him isn't maybe as necessary as it was in the bygone era when Shaq was terrorizing the league.
     
  4. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Why would you have to put a smaller player next to him? Also it seems to me you have not watched Aldrige in the past few months. It seems pretty hard to call a dude soft when he has been averaging 25 and 10 for a really long time now. Have you even been paying attention to recent events? Yea he isn't the toughest guy in the world. But he isn't the guy that I had to worry about his rebounding anymore, either. In fact, it has become quite the opposite. If Aldridge doesn't get 10 rebounds now I am suprised. Outside shots are pretty rare too. It's all about the paint, and shots about 2 feet from the rim.
     
  5. Run BJM

    Run BJM Heavy lies the crown. Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,749
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Only what I read on these boards and the couple of times he played GS in December (where he produced on par with his last few years and was by no means a dominant force even against our mediocre big men).

    It doesn't really matter to me though. I see the recent splits and his game log and they're great numbers but I still can't see any team winning a ring with him as your starting C. The great teams in the league are just too big and too physical. You could have a great front court with him as your PF and a guy like Perkins, Nene, rehabilitated Oden (all FAs this offseason is why I mention them). A front court like that could match up with the Lakers. LMA won't drop 25/10 on the Lakers or Celtics every game for a 7 game series. To win a ring you need a massive front court and you do need that great all around front court player but rarely are they doing it all themselves and dropping crazy numbers. Look at KG on the T'Wolves, look at Dwight right now, Look at Gasol on the Grizz (probably the closest thing to LMA's current circumstances). Also consider the dip in statistical production seen in KG, Gasol, Rasheed when they went to contending teams. Even Duncan- he put up some great numbers in his prime but a lot of his career were very good but not other worldly numbers. To me there's no doubt he could have averaged 30 ppg every year for 10 years if he wanted to but the Spurs wouldn't have been as good.

    Granted, there are a lot of other factors that go into being a legit contender (dominant perimeter player, defense, coaching, etc.), but to me one requirement is having a very big front court. Usually with a great all around 6'11+ PF and a bruising C who (along with the other big PF) can shut down the paint; KG-Perkins (Perk is only 6'10 but hes fugging huge and a great defender), Gasol-Bynum, Rasheed-Big Ben (again, Big Ben is 6'9ish but plays huge and one of the best defenders of our era). The only exceptions being if you have a Duncan or Shaq type of player which Aldridge certainly is not. Or if you have MJ.

    Perhaps you guys can somehow land a Griffin or Malone (lol) but I'd say the more likely option would be to just slide your beloved Aldridge over to PF and insert a big ass C who can eat space and compete with Bynum, Perkins, Dwight, etc. this should, of course be accompanied by a big dip in Aldridge's current 25/10 clip but I think you'd be a much better team as far as competing for a ring goes. Unless Roy returns to form you're still out a dominant wing player and a great coach though...
     
  6. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,781
    Likes Received:
    27,540
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In today's NBA, I think the 4-5 are pretty interchangable.
     
  7. BlazerCaravan

    BlazerCaravan Hug a Bigot... to Death

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    28,071
    Likes Received:
    10,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, it seems like, instead of the Lone Big Man, you have the Lone Ball Handler. 4/5 are interchangeable, as are 2/3 many times. It's the "True Point Guard" who is the hot commodity (where the Really Tall Guy was the hot commodity in the 60's and 70's).
     
  8. huevonkiller

    huevonkiller Change (Deftones)

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    25,798
    Likes Received:
    90
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Student.
    Location:
    Miami, Florida
    Gasol is playing at nearly exactly the same level on the Lakers, probably a bit better on defense. KG got really old, and tore his knee his second season with the C's.

    Oh and they need talented basketball players, they could have whatever complimentary tough big and lose to a "soft" front line like Miami's. Minstrel is right, people focus too much on labels.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2011

Share This Page