Science Are the Covid Vaccines the Biggest Pharma Corporate Welfare Bailout in History?

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by RoseCityRebel, May 3, 2021.

  1. RoseCityRebel

    RoseCityRebel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2020
    Messages:
    512
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Mercenary
    Location:
    Slabtown
    Twitter is for morons and kooks. Seems about right.

    Are all the doctors and patients who saw positive results from HCQ/Zinc liars? Why? What would be the point?

    That’s quite the BlueAnon conspiracy theory. Forgive me for not believing you over medical professionals and patients who put the reputations on the line only to have Trump haters who don’t know ibuprofen from acetaminophen mock them.

    The politicians who denied people the use of a safe generic cost countless people their lives, IMO. There was no reason to demonize HCQ other than it is extremely inexpensive.
     
  2. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,036
    Likes Received:
    24,903
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    I was quoting you.

    Anecdotal evidence is not sufficient. Could be correlation rather than causation.

    And you are certainly welcome to that opinion. It's not a valid medical opinion, though.

    And, you know, the fact that it doesn't work against Covid.

    barfo
     
    Phatguysrule, Minstrel and twobullz like this.
  3. RoseCityRebel

    RoseCityRebel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2020
    Messages:
    512
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Mercenary
    Location:
    Slabtown
    Contradicted himself in the same post. Amazing. How do you know it doesn’t work against Covid? Where is your medical proof? Again, what motivation is there for doctors to put their reputations on the line to lie about a generic medicine that they believe helped treat Covid based on the results they saw in their clinics.

    Why are you so opposed to people choosing to take a safe generic as treatment while at the same time promoting mRNA vaccines that don’t always work, as we’ve seen.

    At the very worst, HCQ doesn’t work for them. Why do you care? Do you own stock in Moderna of Pfizer?
     
    Last edited: May 4, 2021
  4. RoseCityRebel

    RoseCityRebel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2020
    Messages:
    512
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Mercenary
    Location:
    Slabtown
    “They are all quacks” is such a stupid and embarrassingly simplistic take.

    “Unsafe” HCQ has been on the market for almost 20 years longer than ibuprofen with no change in its safety profile. It was so disingenuous trying to tell the Sheeple that it was unsafe to the point some states were banning its use for Covid but not lupus.

    Generics don’t make Big Pharma billions, though.
     
    Last edited: May 4, 2021
  5. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    122,806
    Likes Received:
    122,792
    Trophy Points:
    115
    HCQ has specific benefits for specific medical conditions. Saying it's a safe generic drug doesn't really mean much. Aspirin is a safe generic drug but that doesn't mean it's good for treating herpes. Serious in-depth medical studies were done on HCQ and there is no benefit for treating Covid.

    What other mRNA vaccines haven't worked? The two mRNA vaccines currently in use have been working wonderfully.
     
  6. RoseCityRebel

    RoseCityRebel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2020
    Messages:
    512
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Mercenary
    Location:
    Slabtown
    You’re somewhat lying. Studies found no benefit of HCQ on hospitalized patients. Anecdotal evidence see by some physicians for early prophylactic use after a positive test caused many to speak up about the results they found in their patients. Why would they lie about this and ruin their reputations? That makes no objective sense.

    If you want to be a human lab rat for a mRNA vaccine, be my guest. Not for me unless I buy a fake card.

    Guess who funded these 5 studies.

    https://www.idsociety.org/covid-19-...peutics-and-interventions/hydroxychloroquine/


    Guidelines
     
  7. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    Didn't you provide the same take here:

     
  8. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    122,806
    Likes Received:
    122,792
    Trophy Points:
    115
    From your own link,

    In summary: While observational studies of the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) in patients with COVID-19 have had mixed results, several randomized controlled trials conducted in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 have not shown clinical benefit, nor have randomized controlled trials focused on post-exposure prophylaxis. In addition, some data suggest the use of HCQ may be associated with significant cardiac adverse events in patients with COVID-19. The use of HCQ or CQ is not recommended in patients with COVID-19.

    Anyway so will you be taking the Johnson and Johnson covid vaccine?
     
    e_blazer likes this.
  9. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    67,841
    Likes Received:
    66,596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Unvaccinated people in India don't seem to be surviving the virus so any conspiracy theory about it being a placebo is pure bs....I have family members with lupus....it's not the same treatment for covid...that's just Trumpbabble...and Trump claims he got covid after months earlier taking those tablets...none of it adds up...is big pharma making a pile of money...yes....and in my view...humans have been lab rats since the dawn of the industrial age...pharmacutical medicines have saved my life many times...good luck fighting an infection without getting the shot....if that makes me a lab rat...so be it. I survived a flesh eating bacteria in the tropics with two weeks quarantine and 72 injections.....guy in the next room fighting the same thing didn't make it...if you want to gamble with your immune system's response I fully support your right to do it....I'll never recommend it though. Be prepared to homeschool though....you need to vaccinate your kids to attend public school...it's always been like that...I needed my vaccinations to get a work permit overseas, etc.....we're not fragile, pure organic beings...we're polluted from carcinogens and chemicals that have been around all our lives.
     
    Hoopguru likes this.
  10. RoseCityRebel

    RoseCityRebel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2020
    Messages:
    512
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Mercenary
    Location:
    Slabtown
    Yet another safe generic treatment that is safe is shut down by politicians. Now why would this be happening?

    Sheeple...

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/me...ug-ivermectin/ar-BB1gm2lj?ocid=BingNewsSearch


    An attorney for Elmhurst Hospital said at a court hearing Tuesday that a patient whose daughter sued to procure a controversial treatment for COVID-19 has begun to receive the medication.

    The lawyer, Joseph Monahan, said an outside doctor was granted credentials to work at the hospital so he could administer ivermectin to Nurije Fype, a 68-year-old who has been in intensive care for nearly a month and is on a ventilator. She received her first dose Monday night, according to Ralph Lorigo, one of her attorneys.

    Monahan said the hospital’s own doctors did not want to administer the medication, which is normally used to treat patients suffering from diseases caused by parasitic worms. The Food and Drug Administration has cautioned against its use in COVID-19 cases, saying its safety and efficacy for that application has not been established.

    But some researchers and physicians say they have seen good results from the drug, and when Fype’s daughter Desareta read a news story about an upstate New York woman who recovered from COVID-19 after receiving ivermectin, she went to court to secure its use for her mother.

    DuPage County Judge James Orel ordered Elmhurst Hospital not to stand in the way of Fype receiving the medication. When Fype’s own doctor was unable to administer it, Lorigo said, the legal team found another physician who had to travel “1½, 2 hours each way” but was willing to do it.

    Lorigo asked the judge to order Elmhurst Hospital to pay that doctor’s fees, along with Fype’s legal expenses and a $25,000 fine, and to allow a nurse to administer the drug instead of the doctor. Orel declined, saying the hospital had met the conditions of his order.

    “The medication is being given,” he said.
     
  11. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,036
    Likes Received:
    24,903
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    In the appropriate medical journals, where it belongs.

    Who said they were lying? Anecdotal observations are not lies, they simply aren't statistically meaningful.

    I ate an orange today and I didn't get covid today. Therefore, oranges prevent covid? Maybe, but further study would be necessary to validate that hypothesis.

    Actually, that's not the very worst. The worst would be they take it rather than something that would actually help them, and also suffer side effects from it.

    But I don't think I've suggested that people be forbidden from taking it if they want to, despite medical advice to the contrary.

    I own Pfizer and J&J. I got the Moderna shot. Make of that what you will.

    barfo
     
  12. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    122,806
    Likes Received:
    122,792
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19

    COVID-19. We’ve been living with it for what sometimes seems like forever. Given the number of deaths that have occurred from the disease, it’s perhaps not surprising that some consumers are looking at unconventional treatments, not approved or authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

    Though this is understandable, please beware. The FDA’s job is to carefully evaluate the scientific data on a drug to be sure that it is both safe and effective for a particular use, and then to decide whether or not to approve it. Using any treatment for COVID-19 that’s not approved or authorized by the FDA, unless part of a clinical trial, can cause serious harm.

    There seems to be a growing interest in a drug called ivermectin to treat humans with COVID-19. Ivermectin is often used in the U.S. to treat or prevent parasites in animals. The FDA has received multiple reports of patients who have required medical support and been hospitalized after self-medicating with ivermectin intended for horses.

    Here’s What You Need to Know about Ivermectin
    • FDA has not approved ivermectin for use in treating or preventing COVID-19 in humans. Ivermectin tablets are approved at very specific doses for some parasitic worms, and there are topical (on the skin) formulations for head lice and skin conditions like rosacea. Ivermectin is not an anti-viral (a drug for treating viruses).
    • Taking large doses of this drug is dangerous and can cause serious harm.
    • If you have a prescription for ivermectin for an FDA-approved use, get it from a legitimate source and take it exactly as prescribed.
    • Never use medications intended for animals on yourself. Ivermectin preparations for animals are very different from those approved for humans.
    What is Ivermectin and How is it Used?
    Ivermectin tablets are approved by the FDA to treat people with intestinal strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis, two conditions caused by parasitic worms. In addition, some topical (on the skin) forms of ivermectin are approved to treat external parasites like head lice and for skin conditions such as rosacea.

    Some forms of ivermectin are used in animals to prevent heartworm disease and certain internal and external parasites. It’s important to note that these products are different from the ones for people, and safe when used as prescribed for animals, only.

    When Can Taking Ivermectin Be Unsafe?
    The FDA has not reviewed data to support use of ivermectin in COVID-19 patients to treat or to prevent COVID-19; however, some initial research is underway. Taking a drug for an unapproved use can be very dangerous. This is true of ivermectin, too.

    There’s a lot of misinformation around, and you may have heard that it’s okay to take large doses of ivermectin. That is wrong.

    Even the levels of ivermectin for approved uses can interact with other medications, like blood-thinners. You can also overdose on ivermectin, which can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hypotension (low blood pressure), allergic reactions (itching and hives), dizziness, ataxia (problems with balance), seizures, coma and even death.

    Ivermectin Products for Animals Are Different from Ivermectin Products for People
    For one thing, animal drugs are often highly concentrated because they are used for large animals like horses and cows, which can weigh a lot more than we do—a ton or more. Such high doses can be highly toxic in humans.

    Moreover, FDA reviews drugs not just for safety and effectiveness of the active ingredients, but also for the inactive ingredients. Many inactive ingredients found in animal products aren’t evaluated for use in people. Or they are included in much greater quantity than those used in people. In some cases, we don’t know how those inactive ingredients will affect how ivermectin is absorbed in the human body.

    Meanwhile, effective ways to limit the spread of COVID-19 continue to be to wear your mask, stay at least 6 feet from others who don’t live with you, wash hands frequently, and avoid crowds.

    https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consu...-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
     
    Phatguysrule likes this.
  13. jonnyboy

    jonnyboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2016
    Messages:
    6,619
    Likes Received:
    5,254
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wyoming
    Also not approved by the FDA:

    Any COVID-19 vaccine.

    To summarize what you just posted:

    -The FDA has never even reviewed any ivermectin studies in relation to Covid-19 treatment.
    -Don’t take animal medicine.
    -If you take too much of a medicine, it could be bad for you.
    -Don’t overdose on ivermectin.
    -Shut up and wear a mask bitch.

    Thanks, FDA.
     
    Last edited: May 4, 2021
    HailBlazers likes this.
  14. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    122,806
    Likes Received:
    122,792
    Trophy Points:
    115


    nbcchicago.com

    Are COVID Vaccines FDA Approved? Here's How the Process Works
    NBC Chicago
    4 minutes
    News that Moderna was inching closer to requesting full approval of its COVID vaccine by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has led to some questions surrounding the approval process for the coronavirus vaccines this week.

    Currently, no coronavirus vaccine is fully approved by the FDA, but three were given emergency use authorization by the agency.

    They include vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson, the last of which regulators recommended be paused Tuesday while they investigate reports of potentially dangerous blood clots in a small number of women.

    Emergency use authorization allows a vaccine to become available prior to full approval in the case of public health emergencies. The FDA can revoke the EUA at any time.

    "The vaccines met FDA’s rigorous scientific standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality needed to support emergency use authorization," the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states on its website.

    FDA approval of a drug, which requires a rigorous and structured process, means that data on the drug’s effects have been reviewed by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, which rules on whether the drug's provided benefits "outweigh its known and potential risks for the intended population," according to the agency's website.

    Moderna, citing data from its phase three clinic trial, reported its COVID-19 vaccine was more than 90% effective at protecting against COVID and more than 95% effective against severe disease up to six months after the second dose, the company said Tuesday.

    The update brings Moderna a step closer to filing its request for full U.S. approval, CNBC reports.

    Once it gets full approval, Moderna can begin marketing the shots directly to consumers and selling them to individuals and private companies in the U.S.

    Similarly, Pfizer and BioNTech said at the end of March that data from their Phase 3 trial showed high levels of protection against COVID six months after second doses.

    "Because of that, that means that Pfizer is now going to be able to apply for the FDA for the full approval," Chicago Department of Public Health Commissioner Dr. Allison Arwady said at the time. "It's been under emergency use authorization, but that step is the part that lets you actually move ahead and apply for the full approval authorization, which is a big deal and exciting."

    Since then, the companies have requested the FDA expand the emergency use of their COVID-19 vaccine to include adolescents aged 12 to 15.

    Meanwhile, U.S. health officials are weighing next steps as they investigate a handful of unusual blood clots in people who received Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine — a one-dose shot that many countries were eagerly awaiting to help speed virus protection.

    It’s not clear if the exceedingly rare reports — so far, six cases out of more than 7 million inoculations in the U.S. — really are linked to the J&J vaccine. But the government recommended a pause in J&J vaccinations on Tuesday, just a week after European regulators declared that such clots are a rare but possible risk with the AstraZeneca vaccine, a shot made in a similar way but not yet approved for use in the U.S.

    https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/cor...approved-heres-how-the-process-works/2486206/
     
  15. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    122,806
    Likes Received:
    122,792
    Trophy Points:
    115

    fda.gov

    Learn More About COVID-19 Vaccines From the FDA

    8-10 minutes
    See the evidence for each COVID-19 vaccine and the reasoning behind the FDA’s emergency use authorizations.

    April 23, 2021: The FDA amended the emergency use authorization of the Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) COVID-19 vaccine to include information about a very rare and serious type of blood clot in people who receive the vaccine. View frequently asked questions about Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine...

    Report vaccine side effects toll-free at 1-800-822-7967 or online to FDA/CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).





    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has authorized three COVID-19 vaccines for emergency use. The vaccines are:

    Emergency use authorization (EUA) allows these vaccines to be distributed in the U.S. Learn more about EUAs for COVID-19 vaccines from the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER).

    Who authorizes COVID-19 vaccines for emergency use?
    The FDA is the authority that has regulatory oversight of the safety, effectiveness and quality of vaccines that are used in the U.S., including COVID-19 vaccines. FDA employees who are career scientists and doctors are the people who decided to authorize COVID-19 vaccines after they thoroughly analyzed and evaluated the data on COVID-19 vaccine safety, effectiveness and manufacturing quality.

    The FDA may issue an EUA when the agency’s scientific experts have determined that the known and potential benefits of the vaccine outweigh its known and potential risks. FDA employees are fathers, mothers, daughters, sons, sisters, brothers and more. They and their families are directly impacted by the work they do.

    Why should I get a COVID-19 vaccine?
    When you get a COVID-19 vaccine, you are choosing to protect yourself and make a difference for your children, parents, grandparents, and other loved ones. Millions of people in the U.S. have already received a COVID-19 vaccine. For a community to be fully protected, most community members need to get the vaccine. Getting vaccinated to prevent COVID-19 will help protect you from COVID-19, and it may also protect the people around you.

    How do I get a COVID-19 vaccine?
    Go to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website to find your state and local health departments who are responsible for COVID-19 vaccine distribution. All questions and concerns should be sent to your state government or local health department. The U.S. government’s goal is to have enough COVID-19 vaccine doses for all people in the U.S. who choose to be vaccinated.

    FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccines are being distributed for free by states and local communities. If you see vaccines for sale online, or if someone asks you for money to get a vaccine appointment, to put your name on a waiting list, or to get access to a vaccine, it is a scam. You do not need to pay to get a vaccine appointment or to be put on a waiting list.

    Do the COVID-19 vaccines work?
    Yes. All three FDA-authorized vaccines are effective in preventing COVID-19 and related serious outcomes, including hospitalization and deaths. The FDA thoroughly evaluated and analyzed the safety and effectiveness data for all of the authorized COVID-19 vaccines and determined that the available data for each vaccine provides clear evidence that the known and potential benefits outweigh the known and potential risks of each vaccine.

    Do the COVID-19 vaccines work against the new variants?
    The available information suggests that the authorized vaccines remain effective in protecting the American public against currently circulating strains of COVID-19. We are already talking with vaccine manufacturers about these new strains and how to quickly and safely make any changes that may be needed in the future.

    Some variants spread more easily than others and are more transmissible than the original virus that causes COVID-19. To help slow the spread of COVID-19, get a COVID-19 vaccine when it is available to you. Other ways to slow the spread include:

    • Wearing a mask
    • Keeping 6 feet apart from others who don’t live with you
    • Avoiding crowds and poorly ventilated indoor spaces
    • Washing your hands often with soap and water (use hand sanitizer if soap and water aren’t available)
    How safe are the COVID-19 vaccines?
    The FDA evaluated data from clinical studies that included tens of thousands of people for each COVID-19 vaccine. The FDA authorized the vaccines because the data from these studies clearly showed that the known and potential benefits of the FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccines outweighed the known and potential risks.

    Report vaccine side effects toll-free at 1-800-822-7967 or online to FDA/CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

    Millions of doses of FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccines have been given to people all around the country. Serious adverse events following vaccination are very rare. Allergic reactions, some of which are severe, and cases of anaphylaxis have occurred following administration of COVID-19 vaccines. Anaphylaxis is a severe, life-threatening allergic reaction that happens within seconds or minutes of exposure to an allergen. Because of this remote chance of severe allergic reaction or anaphylaxis, health care providers may ask you to stay at the place where you received your COVID-19 vaccine for monitoring for 15 to 30 minutes.

    For one vaccine, the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine, there have been cases reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) of a type of blood clot called cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) in combination with low levels of platelets in the blood (thrombocytopenia). CVST occurs when a blood clot forms in the brain's venous sinuses. This prevents blood from draining out of the brain. It is a type of rare stroke.

    On April 13, 2021, the FDA and CDC recommended a pause in the use of this vaccine out of an abundance of caution while it further investigates these cases and to ensure that the health care provider community is aware of the potential for these adverse events and can plan for proper recognition and management due to the unique treatment required with this type of blood clot.

    Can I see the safety and effectiveness data that support the Emergency Use Authorization of the COVID-19 vaccines?
    The FDA is publicly sharing information about COVID-19 vaccines so you can see the evidence for yourself. The FDA’s analysis of clinical trial data, as well as demographic information about the clinical study volunteers, is available in the FDA Briefing Document for each vaccine. You can also view the advisory committee webcasts where outside experts discuss the data. The FDA’s reasoning for authorizing each vaccine is available in the FDA Decision Memorandum.

    COVID-19 Vaccine FDA Briefing Document Advisory Committee Meeting Webcast FDA Decision Memorandum
    Pfizer-BioNTech
    COVID-19 Vaccine
    Pfizer-BioNTech December 10, 2020 Webcast Pfizer-BioNTech
    Moderna
    COVID-19 Vaccine
    Moderna December 17, 2020 Webcast Moderna
    Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine
    (Johnson & Johnson)
    Janssen February 26, 2021 Webcast Janssen
    Does the FDA monitor COVID-19 vaccine safety after authorization?
    Yes. The FDA and the CDC have several systems in place to continually monitor COVID-19 vaccine safety. These systems, called “passive surveillance” and “active surveillance” systems, rapidly detect and investigate potential safety problems. Systems such as the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and CDC’s text-based v-safe system, which receive reports of adverse events following vaccination, are examples of passive surveillance systems. The FDA‘s BEST InitiativeExternal Link Disclaimer is an example of an active surveillance system, which can rapidly analyze information occurring in millions of individuals recorded in large data systems to investigate any safety signals that are identified by VAERS or v-safe.

    Related Information
     
    Phatguysrule likes this.
  16. jonnyboy

    jonnyboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2016
    Messages:
    6,619
    Likes Received:
    5,254
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wyoming
    My skepticism about taking an experimental vaccine for a disease I’m not at risk for is not about microchips and other weird shit. It’s mainly rooted in the fact that I live in a country with a for-profit healthcare system that props up companies that price gouge and fuck over poor and working people as a tried and true business model.

    I don’t think they just now randomly started to give a fuck about people over profits. I just don’t, sorry. That ship has sailed. I won’t be receiving this vaccine, ever.
     
    HailBlazers and SlyPokerDog like this.
  17. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,527
    Likes Received:
    16,553
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The vaccine is free... This is the one time they aren't price gouging poor people.
     
    riverman likes this.
  18. stampedehero

    stampedehero Make Your Day, a Doobies Day Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    12,451
    Likes Received:
    9,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Part Time Building Inspector
    Location:
    NJ
  19. Lanny

    Lanny Original Season Ticket Holder "Mr. Big Shot"

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    26,638
    Likes Received:
    16,951
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Elec. & Computer Engineer OSU Computer Science PSU
    Location:
    Lake Oswego, OR
    Taking it for Covid-19 is just plain stupid and dangerous unless under a doctor's supervision but what doctor would be stupid enough to prescribe hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19?
     
  20. jonnyboy

    jonnyboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2016
    Messages:
    6,619
    Likes Received:
    5,254
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wyoming
    Bullshit were all paying for it through taxes, national debt and our children not having a future. Pharma companies don’t give shit away for free. Trillion dollar bills don’t come from nowhere, someone’s going to collect on these debts and the politicians who got the loans and signed your name on the loan application aren’t going to be the ones face to face with the loan sharks. On what planet does it make sense for the stock markets to be up 70% in the face of unprecedented unemployment, evictions and homelessness? The building is getting looted before they torch it, it’s a free for all. People are giving up way too much for a false sense of security.
     

Share This Page