Politics Benghazi select hearing live

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by magnifier661, Oct 22, 2015.

  1. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    So.... I doubt anything will come from this because Hilary is the chosen one to be fielded for the Democrat Party. Obama won't allow the charges to be made on the email scandal, nor will this Benghazi hearing do much to incriminate her as well/
     
  2. Sedatedfork

    Sedatedfork Rip City Rhapsody

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,936
    Likes Received:
    4,322
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle
    Probably nothing will become of it. The GOP folks have pretty much admitted that it is all a political show to try to undermine Hillary Clinton anyway.
     
  3. blue32

    blue32 Who wants a mustache ride?

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    8,613
    Likes Received:
    2,102
    Trophy Points:
    113
    she should be in jail. :-\ or at least removed from office.
     
  4. kingslayer

    kingslayer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2013
    Messages:
    3,703
    Likes Received:
    2,338
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Yup. An overwhelming majority of Americans believe the same as well. It's a partisan freak show aimed at scoring political points for Republicans. Chalk it up as another witch hunt that has failed to resonate with anyone aside from the Fox News base.
     
  5. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    The Fox News base argument is False. There aren't too many republicans that believe a thing that hack network has to say. The majority of Republicans want their candidates and legislators follow through with what they promise.
     
  6. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,958
    Likes Received:
    10,630
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
  7. kingslayer

    kingslayer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2013
    Messages:
    3,703
    Likes Received:
    2,338
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Yeah, the Hillary-centric questions tend to follow the same trend as other polls (Pew, Fox News, etc) . She hasn't handled the situation all that particularly well.

    But what is more telling is that most people agree it is being used to gain a political advantage. Hence, why I only pointed that out. Whether or not Hillary has conducted herself well throughout the investigation is another point entirely.

    I'd be curious to see what polling would look like after today's circus.
     
  8. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,060
    Likes Received:
    8,157
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    Bullshit, PapaG-like thread about a Republican Hollywood production of smoke and mirrors. Nobody cares. What Americans care about is not having another asinine Bush war, and not exploding the deficits to a new scale as in the 80s and 00s. Everyone knows that the next president will be a Democrat.
     
  9. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,958
    Likes Received:
    10,630
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    51%, +4, say the republicans are handling it appropriately.

    Seems like that's better than they did in the 2012 election. So one might presume all Romney voters plus a decent chunk of Obama voters make up that 51%.
     
  10. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    32,727
    Likes Received:
    22,785
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Be interesting to see what those polls say next week. I know I'm biased, but I don't see where Republicans gained a whole lot today.

    barfo
     
  11. MarAzul

    MarAzul LongShip

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Life is good!
    Location:
    Near Bandon Oregon
    Well we did learn today that the lady did not believe the video caused the attack, so it was a lye telling us it was the video. She told the family of the Seals killed it was the video and she has never corrected the lye. Weird, if she knew as she told her daughter, and the Egyptian, why the hell did she let Susan Rice go on TV with the bullshit? Rice worked for her!

    Hiding behind "Security Professionals" shows a complete lack of responsibility. Security Professional are fine when the host country is responsible and takes responsibility for your consulate people,
    but hell, in this place she was the only one with the power to commit to acts of war to save those people. They were there because she needed them there and she punted when the shit happened. That is not Commander in Chief level performance.
     
  12. Further

    Further Guy

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    11,098
    Likes Received:
    4,037
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Stuff doer
    Location:
    Place
    Yep, I'm biased too. I'm not even much of a Hillary supporter, but I have to admit all this BS makes me actually want to support her more. Watching an issue like this be used to politically attack a candidate instead of actually doing something positive (the last 7 committees were sufficient for actually getting to the truth) makes me really dislike all the republicans on that committee and its supporters.

    I really don't understand how anyone can view todays proceedings and come away feeling like it was a win for the Republicans. But as we see here on this board, there are plenty.
     
  13. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,958
    Likes Received:
    10,630
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    You'd think if they wanted to damage her politically, they'd have waited until much closer to the election to have her testify.

    Unless she perjured herself and they can prove it.
     
  14. Further

    Further Guy

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    11,098
    Likes Received:
    4,037
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Stuff doer
    Location:
    Place
    Or if they wanted to damage her enough to keep her from becoming the nominee because they thought Bernie, Lincoln or any other candidate would be much easier to beat in the general, then the timing seems spot on. Only, they suck at it, and in the end its going to hurt them more than her. I have no doubt this is a witch hunt. 8 Committees. This is excessive. This is abuse of power and corrupting a very important process for political gain.
     
    donkiez likes this.
  15. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,958
    Likes Received:
    10,630
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    I think they'd rather damage her as the nominee, if that were their true intent.

    With W and republican congress or O and a democratic congress, we weren't getting any congressional oversight. Partisan investigations are the ideal way to do that, IMO.
     
  16. Further

    Further Guy

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    11,098
    Likes Received:
    4,037
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Stuff doer
    Location:
    Place
    First off, better to never face someone who may be dangerous. Second, there are logistical problems to putting off this subject long enough to have it really be dangerous in the general. There would end up being a year of sitting on their asses and that would scream political motivation even more than it does now, every Dem would boycott and it would be the entire issue would become to radioactive to touch. So for political advantage, expediency and appearances, any attempt to defame her by committee had to be done according to a moderate timeline.

    Just because there is gridlock and the parties don't play nice on the issues is not reason to turn serious topic like this into a partisan brawl. It's disgusting. It would be gross if the Dems were doing it (they have politicalized tragedies in the past) but in this case its just the Republicans who come out looking small, petty and without respect for those who served and died.

    Just look around at any non-patrician news source, toss out the MSNBC's and the FOX's and what you have left are stories that point to Clinton holding up well against this partisan attack. This issue is a loser for Republicans in general, but they just can't see it because their primary voters love it.
     
  17. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,958
    Likes Received:
    10,630
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Wait a second here.

    Waiting would scream partisanship. Having the hearings now screams partisanship.

    Make up your mind :)

    It requires partisan oversight to get to the truth. Otherwise the congresscritters will just grandstand and fawn all over the person being investigated.
     
  18. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    23,284
    Likes Received:
    28,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    So, from what I gather from various sources:

    1. Chris Stevens was posted to Libya as ambassador in July 2012. The facility there was not up to US standards for a consulate, had inadequate security, and there are records of 100's of emails from Ambassador Stevens asking for improvements to security. Those requests were denied or ignored by the State Dept. Mrs. Clinton claims that she had no knowledge of the requests and it wasn't her job to review such requests. "Security professionals" were responsible, but nobody has ever been called on the carpet to answer for, or been fired for, the lack of adequate security.

    2. At the time that Stevens arrived, other governments were closing their embassies because of concerns about growing unrest in the area.

    3. In the fall of 2012, President Obama was in the midst of his reelection campaign and was touting success in Libya and a general reduction in terrorist activities as achievements of his administration.

    4. When the attack in Benghazi occurred, the Obama administration, backed up by the State Department, claimed numerous times that the attack was by a disorganized mob reacting to an internet video. That narrative went on for a couple of weeks despite documented evidence that Mrs. Clinton knew the story was a lie and had made statements to her daughter and the Egyptian government that the attack was well-organized and appeared to be the work of an al Quaida affiliate.

    Sure, the Republicans are using this investigation as a means to put pressure on the Clinton campaign, but that doesn't change the fact that an American ambassador and his staff were knowingly placed in harm's way without adequate security and that the ambassador and three other American's died as a result of this fact. As if that weren't bad enough, Mrs. Clinton and her staff knowingly fed the public misinformation about the nature of the attack, apparently in an attempt to assure that the President's reelection bid wasn't derailed. Partisan politics aside, these facts alone would make me question the character of Mrs. Clinton and whether she is someone worthy of the presidency.
     
    magnifier661 likes this.
  19. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,958
    Likes Received:
    10,630
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Vote for Hillary so America can look like Benghazi.
     
    magnifier661 likes this.
  20. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    In a nutshell. The sad thing is Hilary won't even be hurt by this. She is protected by MSM and the Obama administration
     

Share This Page