Randle El was #2 in Pittz.Lloyd was #1 in San Fran.LaVar... I love his personality, he's funny and stuff, he's strong, fast, he's a beast. But Gregg Williams and Joe Gibbs said that it wasn't his attitude that kept him from playing...
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Apr 17 2006, 03:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Randle El was #2 in Pittz.Lloyd was #1 in San Fran.LaVar... I love his personality, he's funny and stuff, he's strong, fast, he's a beast. But Gregg Williams and Joe Gibbs said that it wasn't his attitude that kept him from playing...</div>Just because they played that role didnt mean they were any good at it. Having a clown like Brandon Lloyd as their #1 reciever is one of the main reasons they have a top 10 pick this year, and you wonder why they let him go for a couple mid round picks? Im suprised they got that much.And Randel El had better stats as a #3 Reciever then he did as a Starting WR with much more playing time. Does that not tell you something?
randle el is much better in the slot.....not on the outside. Lloyd is an engima. He can catch the hardest balls in the world......and then drop the easiest on the very next play. gotta love that stat for a number 1 guy or even your possession reciever.
I'll still take St. Louis', Indianapolis', Kansas City's, and more offenses over the Redskins.Also. I could play on the damn Redskins d-line.
Yeah, I would take those offenses over the Redskins too, but that leaves us to the 2nd best offesne in the NFC. Or tied forst first with St. Louis.Our d-line? Ok, we had ONE game... Count it ONE GAME... when we had all 4 starters play. Wynn SUCKS, I'll admit that. But Andre Carter got 13 sacks in SF when he was healthy. And Griffin, if HE can stay healthy, is great, just like he was in the 04-05 season. Salave'a? Ask JHair about him. B E A S T. He was hurt for most of the year too. Daniels? LMAO! Cowboys fans know exactly how good he is when he isn't injured. And I think having one of the best run defenses for years had to do with our line...Ok talk to TheFranchise about this... he knows more about Randle El.You know that vision cone in Madden? It's pretty realistic IMO. Yes, Lloyd's catching is a 96, but look at the QB he had. I tried being the Niners once... boy... my friend double teamed him the whole time and i got sacked every play. I could never get the ball to him. But when I did, he did great.Ok now.. I know I can't say he's the best WR because he did good in a video game, but you get my point I hope.Remember how tremendous Santana Moss was when he had a decent (at the most) WR? Even Patten helped him be the best receiver until Patten got hurt. Well now Washington has 6 weapons. Moss, Lloyd, Randle El, Patten, COOLEY, PORTIS. Did the Steelers or 49ers have these weapons? Unless you're a biased fan of them, you're going to say no.
what does that have to do with having a good QB?and what does that have to do with lloyd being able to catch the ball?
Omg... did you even read what I said about video games? Jeesh...How can the worst starting questerback(s) get the ball to him? Especially if he gets double and triple teamed?What do you mean what does that have to do with Lloyd and catching? ? He catches pretty much anything thrown kind of near him.
excpet for the easy ones thrown right at him.........he is the lazy. He will make a great catch then drop a prefect thrown ball on the very next play. that is for sure a 3rd reciever if you ask me.
Some players don't have very high morale and aren't 100% commited when they are playing for a team that only gets a couple wins a season
The cornerback situation. The most likely for starting are Carlos Rogers and Springs. The sense is we are probably taking a corner on the first draft day.
Ok that makes 2 guys now that didn't fully read my post...and they're getting off subject when I have a point.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Apr 17 2006, 05:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Our d-line? Ok, we had ONE game... Count it ONE GAME... when we had all 4 starters play. Wynn SUCKS, I'll admit that. But Andre Carter got 13 sacks in SF when he was healthy. And Griffin, if HE can stay healthy, is great, just like he was in the 04-05 season. Salave'a? Ask JHair about him. B E A S T. He was hurt for most of the year too. Daniels? LMAO! Cowboys fans know exactly how good he is when he isn't injured. And I think having one of the best run defenses for years had to do with our line...</div>Ok, I think you're being a lil' biased. But either way....your point in this? They players can be good when they're healthy, but if they are never healthy, then they can never be good. So they're useless.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ Apr 18 2006, 02:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Apr 17 2006, 05:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Our d-line? Ok, we had ONE game... Count it ONE GAME... when we had all 4 starters play. Wynn SUCKS, I'll admit that. But Andre Carter got 13 sacks in SF when he was healthy. And Griffin, if HE can stay healthy, is great, just like he was in the 04-05 season. Salave'a? Ask JHair about him. B E A S T. He was hurt for most of the year too. Daniels? LMAO! Cowboys fans know exactly how good he is when he isn't injured. And I think having one of the best run defenses for years had to do with our line...</div>Ok, I think you're being a lil' biased. But either way....your point in this? They players can be good when they're healthy, but if they are never healthy, then they can never be good. So they're useless.</div>A little biased?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Punisher @ Apr 18 2006, 02:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>They're healthy right now.</div>Congrats. Most people are healthy in the offseason.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>A little biased? laugh.gif</div>Maybe a lot biased, idk.
If I was biased I would've said they were amazing. I just clearly said how Carter got 13 sacks, Griffin got 70 and 6, Salave'a (in like 8 games) had a lot of FF and tackles, and Daniels had I think 8.5 sacks. A Cowboys fans could say that. So I guess that wasn't biased.....
