Yet those Republican sponsors weren't offended when Maher did all he could to tear down Clinton's efforts in Somalia, Yugoslavia, Haiti, Iraq ("wag the tail"), Iran, North Korea, Ireland, China, bombing a bin Laden camp minutes after Osama had escaped, on and on an on for years and years. I guess it's just a coincidence or an oversight that Republican sponsors, ever so nonpartisan, didn't get him cancelled then.
When I try to edit the spelling of the word "and" only 10 seconds after posting that successfully, it says I don't have permission.
he thinks its is or will be getting to high (taxes) in CA. everyone has a limit, apparently they are reaching his shouldnt he be applauded by the right for this and not called out? i dont get you guys
Surely he could have attracted the kind of sponsors who stopped buying ads on Glenn Beck's show. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/28/as-sponsors-flee-the-igle_n_271321.html
What a way to let your lack of intelligence shine through. You rant about taking something out of context, and then type the above garbage.
Ironically, if Bill Maher has to pay for the kind of government he wants, his overall tax rate would easily be over 70%. It just goes to show, everybody likes free shit.
