I am extremely good with a rifle. Even without an automatic, I can take 5 beer cans off a log at 100 yards, in less than 4 seconds. I can do it with a Model 99 .308 savage I bought new over 60 years ago or and automatic rifle of several types. I have a very nice .270 Winchester and another large caliber bolt action rifle. I could not perform the above in less than twice the time with the bolt action rifles. I have also owned a 6.5mm x 52 Carcano rifle. I would have been very hard pressed to get three shot off in secession without a jam up with that rifle. Not only would Oswald need to be really damn good with a rifle, but the rifle needed to be damn good. Now to blow the back of the mans head off from the rear with bullet entering the rear is damn near a magical feat. But it doesn't end there, the bullet also passed through the governor two times, breaking his arm along the way. But the magic still continues, the bullet lays down, remains in the car, still perfectly formed. I have studied ballistics, tested rounds, built silencers, and generally feel like I was a true firearms expert. But I have never seen feats like were attributed to Oswald and his equipment. I said was, because I hardly ever shoot weapons these days, not that I wouldn't.
They also did this test with highly trained marksmen with the same rifle. None of them could duplicate what Oswald did.
All these Trump fans getting all sulky and righteous just because they can't think of good pee puns. (For the record: even if this was true it's so trivial compared with things Trump does in public in front of crowds that I really don't see that his fans need to bother protesting it. If anything they should be glad that the Golden Showers business is overshadowing the "Manafort and co. colluded with the Russians" stuff that's a lot more plausible. But it sure is funny. So thanks, WHOEVER got it into that report.)
How does this get 7 pages, and a legit serious question... @Rastapopoulos how in the hell are you managing/keeping track of all of these threads?
