C-Webb to Lakers?

Discussion in 'Los Angeles Lakers' started by bruin007, Aug 16, 2006.

  1. Really Lost One

    Really Lost One Suspended

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Messages:
    12,734
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    United States
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting AMS_ice:</div><div class="quote_post">Webber is back up to Iverson in Philly. He won't mind playing back up to Kobe. I think Webber wants to win at this point. He's been in the spotlight but wasn't able to deliver big, ultimately he just wants to win (just ask Karl Malone).</div>
    By backup I thought you meant coming off the bench. [​IMG] Anyways, either way, Webber will not be a great fit for our team. Like I said, he takes away touches, plays horrible defense, and you can't rely on him health wise. We are better off now than we would be with Webber
     
  2. AMS_ICE

    AMS_ICE JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Messages:
    592
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting Brian:</div><div class="quote_post">By backup I thought you meant coming off the bench. [​IMG] Anyways, either way, Webber will not be a great fit for our team. Like I said, he takes away touches, plays horrible defense, and you can't rely on him health wise. We are better off now than we would be with Webber</div>

    Hypothetically speaking, minus Webber's big contract, wouldn't you take him? With regards to touches, sure another slice muct be made for Webber, but not more than what it is now. Kobe takes the bulk of the shots, and Odom, He's an unselfish player, he looks to pass first, and he doesn't need many looks to score. I think the Lakers would take him, of course minus the big contract (hypothetical).
     
  3. CLos

    CLos JBB=The Originals

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,663
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Webber puts up good numbers and can pass the ball. The problem is his contract and he's old. The Lakers could use him though as he's a solid player.

    PG-Smush
    SG-Kobe
    SF-Lamar
    PF-Webber
    C-Kwame
    Sixth Man-Vladimir

    I don't know exactly who they will be able to trade for him but it doesn't look like a bad idea. Weren't the Lakers rumored to get Kevin Garnett???
     
  4. Moo2K4

    Moo2K4 NBA West Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    11,768
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Alburnett, Iowa
    Who isn't rumoured to get KG? For that matter, he's not going anywhere as it is. But that's a different topic. With CWebb, he'd be a horrible fit. He's not good on defense anymore. He's not very good on offense anymore due to his inconsistencies. He relies a lot on his inconsistent jumper now because of his knees. He may be a good passer, but so is Odom. We have him for our passer out of the post, so I don't see a need for CWebb. Beyond that, he's got a terrible contract and we'd have to trade too much away to get him.
     
  5. Skiptomylue11

    Skiptomylue11 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,671
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting CLos:</div><div class="quote_post">I don't know exactly who they will be able to trade for him but it doesn't look like a bad idea. Weren't the Lakers rumored to get Kevin Garnett???</div>
    Read page 2 of this thread, Post #33 by Shapecity.

    He discussed why he does not believe the Lakers will be attaining KG.
     
  6. CLos

    CLos JBB=The Originals

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,663
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I believed I read that and I'm sorry for bringing it up.
     

Share This Page