What kind of response do you expect for all the sillyness being offered? I'm sorry for all the fears you have. But those are all between your ears.
So Russian hackers on the FBI Most Wanted list is nothing? Oh wait, I already know the answer, The Most Wanted List is garbage because Hillary isn't on it.
So you guarantee everything will work out fine for the next four years? Thanks Denny! I feel soooo much better now. barfo
Not at all. Just that all the bullshit being thrown against the wall, hoping something sticks, is just that - bullshit. He's going to do things your kind disagree with, that's a given (and thank goodness!). If you want to whine and cry about it, go ahead. It's a waste of time, though. Plus, if things continue the way things are going, 8 years.
The Russians didn't set up an illegal server and use it to commit pay for play crimes (among others). They didn't fix the primaries against Sanders. If those things were OK, you know who would be the president elect instead of Trump. You can't whine and complain about the Russians hacking us while we're hacking most, if not all, of our allies. There is no high ground to stand on there.
Well, when it comes to throwing shit against the wall hoping something sticks - you are the expert. barfo
Has anybody linked this Rolling Stone piece yet? Interesting read. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/something-about-this-russia-story-stinks-w458439
1. I'm not whining and complaining about anything. 2. I agree that what Hillary did was wrong. Illegal? That seems to be the argument. That's why I said it's time to enact laws that will clearly prevent something like that from ever happening again. Severs, pay to play, all fucked up. We obviously need to strengthen the laws against this bullshit. 3. Saying that someone or something isn't bad because someone else is worse is not a valid argument.
Yep, I know it when I see it. Been seeing it for months, especially from the media. At least they are mostly resigned to the reality of the election results.
When an election is about the lesser of two evils, then yes it is a valid argument. It's the argument Clinton made the whole election. The emails released clearly showed at least a willingness to give priority to Clinton Foundation donors while Clinton was at State. How about these Russian connections? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-ukraine-victor-pinchuk_us_5834a687e4b01ba68ac35072
So you actually think Trump is evil but you defend him? That's like saying Jeffery Dalmer was evil but it's okay that he ate his victims because he was hungry. "Hey man, they were already dead. It's better than letting them spoil and go to waste."
I think Trump is the lesser of the two evils. For now, I'm judging him on what he's actually doing and not what feeble minded fearmongers on twitter say about him.
