Comparing the Western Conference finals team to the current group

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Charcoal Filtered, Nov 21, 2020.

  1. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    42,643
    Likes Received:
    24,141
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He’s not a pg
     
  2. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    19,074
    Likes Received:
    19,838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He sure plays the position?
    I mean what are the parameters of being a PG?
    I think it’s plays point guard. That is what makes you a point guard right?
     
    SharpesTriumph and blazerkor like this.
  3. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    13,997
    Likes Received:
    14,914
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The fact is when he is playing the point, he is more effective because when he brings the ball up the floor and is charged with piloting the offense, he can take that time he loves to take pounding the rock before making a decision. He is also better suited to guard smaller guards even though he's still catastrophically terrible at it. If CJ ever plays for another team he will probably play at the 1 but have a point forward as the facilitator but the 1 is where CJ is a natural fit... yes he is a scoring point guard but he's still a point guard.
     
    Buffalo Custard likes this.
  4. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,923
    Likes Received:
    32,817
    Trophy Points:
    113
    there's that old saying: you are what you can defend....which means CJ is an announcer
     
  5. Buffalo Custard

    Buffalo Custard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2020
    Messages:
    1,409
    Likes Received:
    1,413
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, CJ is a PG - in the same sense that Damon was a PG. Damon's ball stopping, pound all the air out of the ball nonsense drove me crazy!
     
    TBpup and blazerkor like this.
  6. SharpesTriumph

    SharpesTriumph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2018
    Messages:
    7,003
    Likes Received:
    6,840
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes.

    Its crazy some fans are so delusional they think a player who plays a position isn't a player who plays that position?

    Same people who say a professional is more than getting paid to do something.

    They have some alternative definition of reality.
     
    kjironman1 likes this.
  7. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    20,923
    Likes Received:
    32,817
    Trophy Points:
    113
    there's a difference, IMO, between playing a position and have the traditional skills of that position

    CJ does not have the reactions, vision, or mindset of a traditional PG; and he pounds the ball way too much to consistently run an offense like a PG. But by default, he's a PG when there is nobody else on the floor who remotely resembles a PG, and when his defensive assignment is the opposing PG

    real PG skills have been a scarcity on the Blazer roster since 2015. I don't think it's an accident, rather it's by design. If Portland had a backup PG on the level of a Rondo or a George Hill, Stotts would use him all the time and that would significantly reduce CJ's opportunity for lots of minutes
     
    Buffalo Custard, tester551 and TBpup like this.
  8. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    19,074
    Likes Received:
    19,838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Cj plays Shooting Guard. Damian Lillard is out Point Guard.
     
  9. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,383
    Likes Received:
    34,032
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    Yes but Olshey was quick to point out that Dame and CJ played 95% of the posessions at PG last year. Take out garbage time, that that is just about all of them.
     
  10. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    23,271
    Likes Received:
    28,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    I think the traditional view of what makes a good PG is changing around the league. The Lakers just let Rondo, a traditional PG in my view, walk and traded for Dennis Shroeder, a more offensively oriented guard. Most of the top PGs are big scorers these days. With CJ, when he plays PG in previous seasons it's usually been in a role with a second unit where he is by far the best scoring option out there. His "problem" is that with Dame out, he takes it on himself to get his own shot by dribbling to try to break his man down until he can get his shot off. I agree that that often causes the offense to stagnate and too often to have to settle for a poor shot. My hope, and at this point that's all it is, is that now that he's going to have more scorers available on the second unit he won't hold onto the ball so much. If he does, Stotts should address the matter. I guess all of that is to say that I don't think there's a skill problem with CJ at the point, but his mindset has to be changed when he's in that role.
     
    SharpesTriumph likes this.
  11. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    19,074
    Likes Received:
    19,838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I’m thinking 95% might be more of a way to make a point instead of saying “a lot of the time”. We all know 1M played more than 5 % of the season at PG. 5% would be just under 200 minutes.
    Figuring 4 complete games in a full season. Of course they didn’t play a complete season. So hard to come up with a number exactly?
     
  12. Hoopguru

    Hoopguru Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2014
    Messages:
    19,703
    Likes Received:
    16,264
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think both Dame and CJ can at times stop the motion offense where guys are moving and the ball moves, as iso ball and pnr can really slow things with guys standing in the corner.
    If that doesn't change it will frustrate both DJJ & RoCo.
     
  13. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    I feel like Portland should experiment with staggering not only CJ with Dame, but Nurkic. Let Nurkic be the main facilitator with the bench unit and pair him with CJ, Trent, DJJ, and Zach or Melo. Would help offset having a combo guard running point and his playmaking would mesh well with DJJ.
     
    TBpup, UKRAINEFAN and JDC like this.
  14. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    66,375
    Likes Received:
    64,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Deepest roster I can remember in the modern era...this roster should be better than the Kanter with injured Nurk version....having both Kanter and Nurk will make the best 1-2 center punch...Rodney has to show he's still an impact player but Trent is better now...Dame is better now...I think we're perfectly positioned to contend for a ring right now
     
    e_blazer likes this.
  15. JDC

    JDC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,295
    Likes Received:
    3,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I also like pairing Kanter with Lillard more often.

    Sure, Kanter post ups vs back-up centers is a solid source of offense, but I like him a lot more as roller / offensive rebounder with a guard that can put pressure on the rim.

    CJ / Trent / Hood / DJJ / Nurkic would a pretty effective unit for instance. Complementary on offense and fairly switchy defensively. One thing I've been impressed with about Jones after watching more of his film the last few days is how fluid he is laterally. Really able to sink his hips and slide with smaller players. Handles screens pretty well too.
     
    BonesJones and UKRAINEFAN like this.
  16. James lamphear

    James lamphear Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2018
    Messages:
    7,860
    Likes Received:
    5,531
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well if ever thing fall in place with everyone healthy we will be battling the Lakers and clippers for that too spot.
     
  17. SharpesTriumph

    SharpesTriumph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2018
    Messages:
    7,003
    Likes Received:
    6,840
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I somewhat agree with this.

    Also, Rondo and Hill are making 10 million per year, it doesn't make sense to allocate those resources to a "3rd“ string PG when we've had such glaring problems with starting forwards the last half decade.

    The 2016 contracts were so damming too...
     
  18. SharpesTriumph

    SharpesTriumph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2018
    Messages:
    7,003
    Likes Received:
    6,840
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think this is right. You have a bunch of vocal Blazers fans screaming for a 1980/1990s style PG because they don't understand how the guard position has changed.
     
  19. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,452
    Likes Received:
    38,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    I think it makes sense to start both Hood and RoCo and RoCo probably deserves more minutes so it might make sense to stagger him instead of Hood with that bench unit. Would be a little sketchier and then Hood could finish halves with Dame as the secondary scorer if Nurk/CJ are off the floor depending on how it gets sorted out.
     
  20. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    19,074
    Likes Received:
    19,838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I kind of think Hood will need to show he is 100% before going to far that way but i don't disagree with the premise. Just wonder about his health?
     

Share This Page