DENNY! Make $10,000 FAST!

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by BlazerCaravan, Jun 24, 2014.

  1. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    We can pollute the planet, sure. But CO2 isn't an example of it.
     
  2. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,983
    Likes Received:
    145,240
    Trophy Points:
    115
    There is no way CO2 can destroy the earth. It's impossible.
     
  3. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    Arsenic and asbestos are scientifically proven polluters of both the earth and humans, as proven and replicated repeatedly in laboratories all over the world.

    Models and consensus for AGW, when the models are already shown as inaccurate, isn't science. Why is this so hard for people to understand?
     
  4. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    OK, you got me. I agree. The earth is the earth, and humans trying to change it for our supposed survival needs is the biggest poison to it.

    Gaia4life!
     
  5. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Not .04%. Not .05%. Not .06%.

    We might hit .06% in a few hundred years.
     
  6. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,983
    Likes Received:
    145,240
    Trophy Points:
    115
    We will intentionally change the climate in certain areas of the earth to make it more hospitable and beneficial to us humans. Fact. And it will be done for profit. That also is a fact.
     
  7. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,983
    Likes Received:
    145,240
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Again, CO2 can not destroy the earth. There can be 100% CO2 and the earth would still be here.
     
  8. The_Lillard_King

    The_Lillard_King Westside

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,405
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    It's your little biting comment that make your post so damn jerky it is hard to have any kind of discussion with you.

    You should stop and think why posters react to you so negatively. It's not what you have to say but the way you say it.

    Anyways, I have no interest in have a discussion with someone who thinks they know it all and act like are superior in every topic they discuss. If I feel like venting and being a dick one night, maybe we can fun venting session. Till then go be a SPD to someone else.
     
  9. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    Yes, I caught you trap the first time. Can we move on to discussing the science of this, rather than semantic gotchas?
     
  10. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,983
    Likes Received:
    145,240
    Trophy Points:
    115
    I was replying to Denny.
     
  11. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    CO2 can make things really warm at several orders of magnitude higher concentration.

    I saw it on mythbusters once. They pumped CO2 into a sealed greenhouse and at between 1% and 7% (vs. the .04% we have now), they saw a 1 degree F increase.
     
  12. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    I don't think I know it all. I don't know if there is a god, and I don't know if AGW is a fact, as Further claims. I'm quite willing to admit things I don't know or understand. What bothers me is people who claim to know things as fact, when a basic scientific method isn't even used to prove these facts. People already drove Mags away from this board for purporting to "know" there is no god. I have to laugh at that arrogance, just as I laugh at the arrogance of the AGW Believers. I'm as agnostic on AGW as I am religion/gods. Why is this so hard for people to understand?
     
  13. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    ...and, he missed it for the second time. :cheers:
     
  14. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,983
    Likes Received:
    145,240
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Wait, so there is no control for any possible experiment unless it's on Mythbusters?!?

    That's kinda funny.
     
  15. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    That isn't a control. It's only proof that CO2 is a greenhouse gas.

    Sheesh.
     
  16. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,983
    Likes Received:
    145,240
    Trophy Points:
    115
    I think someone filled your greenhouse with laughing gas. Can't wait to see it next season on Mythbusters.
     
  17. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/control experiment

    control experiment
    n

    1. an experiment designed to check or correct the results of another experiment by removing the variable or variables operating in that other experiment. The comparison obtained is an indication or measurement of the effect of the variables concerned
     
  18. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    I'm not sure you understand a controlled setting versus an uncontrolled setting. :dunno:
     
  19. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,983
    Likes Received:
    145,240
    Trophy Points:
    115
    I do, I just find it hilarious that Denny is using Mythbusters to argue against scientific data.
     
  20. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    The Mythbusters' experiments are conducted in a much more controlled setting than anything that global scientists can put together to justify AGW. AGW science has infinite variables, because the data is literally compiled from a sample of the entire planet. Mythbusters usually can keep their variables down to a much more manageable level, with wind, temperature, humidity, altitude some of the variables.
     
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2014

Share This Page