I'm not so sure. Let's assume AI, Wade, James, Garnett, and Howard are the starters. Joe Johnson, Paul Pierce, Chris Bosh, and Ray Allen are locks for the reserves. There has to be a backup center, so let's say Big Z makes the team. That leaves only two spots left. With the way the Celtics have played this season, I believe Rajon Rondo has to get one of those spots. That leaves Harris competing with Carter, Granger, and Jameer Nelson. Does Devin really deserve it more than those guys? I used to hate Jameer Nelson, but he's had a phenomenal season and absolutely deserves to be in the All-Star discussion. Devin scores a little bit more, but Jameer has been the leader of a terrific Magic team. Danny Granger has turned into a terrific player. The Pacers aren't very good, but there's no doubt that Granger has been playing at an All-Star level. What separates Harris from Granger? I guess the most important question is whether or not Devin deserves it more than Vince. Devin has had a great season, but the Nets' best player is Vince Carter. It's Carter who is the leader of the team and in most cases is still the go to guy. Vince's all around play this season has been great. If the Nets are to have an All-Star, there's a pretty good argument that it should be Carter and not Harris.