Carmelo Anthony is not one-dimensional. This, coming from a person who watched him a whole season in college. He was most definitely not one-dimensional. Richard Jefferson is not one-dimensional, either. This, coming from multiple fans who have been watching nearly every Nets game this season. Where are you from, vcTmac24? Have you been watching RJ all this season..?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (peg182 @ Jan 3 2008, 12:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Carmelo Anthony is not one-dimensional. This, coming from a person who watched him a whole season in college. He was most definitely not one-dimensional. Richard Jefferson is not one-dimensional, either. This, coming from multiple fans who have been watching nearly every Nets game this season. Where are you from, vcTmac24? Have you been watching RJ all this season..?</div> i've watched him in several games about 15 How is he not one-dimensional in proof of stats and in game he seems pretty one-dimensional. Melo has been one-dimensional in the past years and even barkley called Melo one-dimensional but i'd like to hear your debate instead of your love for RJ.
Charles Barkley? Ooooooooooooh boy... I don't even think you understand what a one-dimensional player is.
Jason Kapono is a one-dimensional player. Erick Dampier is a one-dimensional player. Channing Frye is a one-dimensional player. These are potential discussions. Trying to argue that Richard Jefferson is a one-dimensional player is a worthless topic that is nothing but intentionally annoying.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Jan 3 2008, 12:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Charles Barkley? Ooooooooooooh boy... I don't even think you understand what a one-dimensional player is.</div> a person who is only good at one thing, one talent one reason why he's playing. i think i've said enough.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jan 3 2008, 12:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Jason Kapono is a one dimensional player. Erick Dampier is a one dimensional player. Channing Frye is a one dimensional player. These are potential discussions. Trying to argue that Richard Jefferson is a one dimensional player is a worthless topic that is nothing but intentionally annoying.</div> That is another type of one-dimensional. I'm saying RJ is one-dimensional because all he can do is fill up 1 Category on the stat sheet. while all of you guys are loving RJ i'm just trying to make a simple debate but all of you guys are mad about something i disagree with.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vcTmac24 @ Jan 3 2008, 01:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jan 3 2008, 12:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Jason Kapono is a one dimensional player. Erick Dampier is a one dimensional player. Channing Frye is a one dimensional player. These are potential discussions. Trying to argue that Richard Jefferson is a one dimensional player is a worthless topic that is nothing but intentionally annoying.</div> That is another type of one-dimensional. I'm saying RJ is one-dimensional because all he can do is fill up 1 Category on the stat sheet. while all of you guys are loving RJ i'm just trying to make a simple debate but all of you guys are mad about something i disagree with. </div> There is only one type of "one-dimensional". You can't change the definition because you feel like it. RJ is "multi-dimensional". There is no argument there.
Ignoring for a moment how idiotically this debate is structured. So 6.7 RPG isn't enough to fill up a second column on the stat sheet
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jan 3 2008, 12:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vcTmac24 @ Jan 3 2008, 01:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jan 3 2008, 12:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Jason Kapono is a one dimensional player. Erick Dampier is a one dimensional player. Channing Frye is a one dimensional player. These are potential discussions. Trying to argue that Richard Jefferson is a one dimensional player is a worthless topic that is nothing but intentionally annoying.</div> That is another type of one-dimensional. I'm saying RJ is one-dimensional because all he can do is fill up 1 Category on the stat sheet. while all of you guys are loving RJ i'm just trying to make a simple debate but all of you guys are mad about something i disagree with. </div> There is only one type of "one-dimensional". You can't change the definition because you feel like it. RJ is "multi-dimensional". There is no argument there. </div> that's your opinion. RJ is one-dimensional take it or leave it.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jan 3 2008, 12:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Ignoring for a moment how idiotically this debate is structured. So 6.7 RPG isn't enough to fill up a second column on the stat sheet</div> 6.7 RPG? what year? last year? I'm talking about this year. Jefferson has only 4.5 RPG at least know the stats dude EDIT: here's the link to show it enjoy http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?statsId=3523
wow. RJ def is not a one-dimensional player. this is what happens when people rely on stats instead of watching games. let's not forget that we have more rebounders this year, with josh and sean mainly. RJ won't be voted in by the fans because its a popularity vote, but coaches around the east know the improvement in RJ's game and i really believe he will make it. then again if vince and kidd made it (which looks like it), then i think that could hurt RJ. have 3 guys from one team who's currently around .500? one-dimensional players are like marbury, nash, korver, ben wallace. RJ does not fit in with this group
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vcTmac24 @ Jan 3 2008, 01:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jan 3 2008, 12:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vcTmac24 @ Jan 3 2008, 01:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jan 3 2008, 12:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Jason Kapono is a one dimensional player. Erick Dampier is a one dimensional player. Channing Frye is a one dimensional player. These are potential discussions. Trying to argue that Richard Jefferson is a one dimensional player is a worthless topic that is nothing but intentionally annoying.</div> That is another type of one-dimensional. I'm saying RJ is one-dimensional because all he can do is fill up 1 Category on the stat sheet. while all of you guys are loving RJ i'm just trying to make a simple debate but all of you guys are mad about something i disagree with. </div> There is only one type of "one-dimensional". You can't change the definition because you feel like it. RJ is "multi-dimensional". There is no argument there. </div> that's your opinion. RJ is one-dimensional take it or leave it. </div> I choose... leave.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vcTmac24 @ Jan 3 2008, 01:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jan 3 2008, 12:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Ignoring for a moment how idiotically this debate is structured. So 6.7 RPG isn't enough to fill up a second column on the stat sheet</div> 6.7 RPG? what year? last year? I'm talking about this year. Jefferson has only 4.5 RPG at least know the stats dude EDIT: here's the link to show it enjoy http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?statsId=3523 </div> I'm not talking about RJ. Try following along. In your world, is 6.7 RPG enough?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (xcalibur @ Jan 3 2008, 12:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>wow. RJ def is not a one-dimensional player. this is what happens when people rely on stats instead of watching games. let's not forget that we have more rebounders this year, with josh and sean mainly. RJ won't be voted in by the fans because its a popularity vote, but coaches around the east know the improvement in RJ's game and i really believe he will make it. then again if vince and kidd made it (which looks like it), then i think that could hurt RJ. have 3 guys from one team who's currently around .500? one-dimensional players are like marbury, nash, korver, ben wallace. RJ does not fit in with this group</div> WTF, NASH? Nash can score and make plays Not one-dimensional at all. Jefferson is because he can only score. Unless you feel like a pure jump shooter is one-dimensional then no Jefferson isn't. But Jefferson has only been one-dimensional this season because all he's been able to is score.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vcTmac24 @ Jan 3 2008, 01:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>that's your opinion. RJ is one-dimensional take it or leave it.</div> Take or leave what? I take it that your opinion is ridiculous and your logic is poorly formed. I'll leave it for everyone else to draw their own conclusions.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jan 3 2008, 12:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vcTmac24 @ Jan 3 2008, 01:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jan 3 2008, 12:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Ignoring for a moment how idiotically this debate is structured. So 6.7 RPG isn't enough to fill up a second column on the stat sheet</div> 6.7 RPG? what year? last year? I'm talking about this year. Jefferson has only 4.5 RPG at least know the stats dude EDIT: here's the link to show it enjoy http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?statsId=3523 </div> I'm not talking about RJ. Try following along. In your world, is 6.7 RPG enough? </div> Why was that One season of Richard Jefferson's life? I just said Jefferson has been one-dimensional this season, are you that angry you don't even read?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jan 3 2008, 11:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GrandKenyon6 @ Jan 3 2008, 10:10 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Disagree and he won't make the team anyway.</div> What exactly are you disagreeing with? </div> That he's a legit All-Star.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vcTmac24 @ Jan 3 2008, 01:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jan 3 2008, 12:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Oh noes, the following players are one dimensional Ray Allen - 18.9 PPG, 4.0 RPG & 3.1 APG Grant Hill - 16.0 PPG, 4.5 RPG & 3.7 APG Kevin Martin - 24.5 PPG, 4.5 RPG & 2.1 APG Tayshaun Prince - 13.6 PPG, 4.8 RPG & 3.0 APG</div> Ray allen has probably became one-dimensional in recent years. Grant Hill has become a role player. Kevin Martin probably is one-dimensional, Prince plays perimeter defense and is a defensive specialist. </div> So it is your opinion that Kevin Martin is one dimensional. That is very interesting http://sportstwo.com/forums/Kevin-Martin-A...60#entry1532960 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Kevin Martin is one of the most underrated players today.</div> http://sportstwo.com/forums/Kevin-Martin-A...88#entry1532988 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>he's a future star.</div>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vcTmac24 @ Jan 3 2008, 02:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jan 3 2008, 12:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vcTmac24 @ Jan 3 2008, 01:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jan 3 2008, 12:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Ignoring for a moment how idiotically this debate is structured. So 6.7 RPG isn't enough to fill up a second column on the stat sheet</div> 6.7 RPG? what year? last year? I'm talking about this year. Jefferson has only 4.5 RPG at least know the stats dude EDIT: here's the link to show it enjoy http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?statsId=3523 </div> I'm not talking about RJ. Try following along. In your world, is 6.7 RPG enough? </div> Why was that One season of Richard Jefferson's life? I just said Jefferson has been one-dimensional this season, are you that angry you don't even read? </div> You still haven't figured this out?? Wait. Why am I surprised?
