I don't understand where's the fun in being the 10th person who calls Blazer4Ever stupid or being the 15th person who shits on his posts. Cheap likes. Cheap thrills.
You're defending guy who said we should bring back Greg Oden in 2015 and has physically threatened multiple people on this thread? Okay, have fun.
I'm not "defending" just another poster, i'm not standing by his opinions. It's obvious that we're dealing with something else here, i don't think you need me to spell it out for you.
Go to anothers teams forum and make a thread about how one of their players is garbage and see what reaction you get. This is civil.
You can't call a guy that owns the paint and plays basic good basketball "garbage". Since he arrived, we developed advantages for REBOUNDS and another for our second team scoring threat. Nurk doesn't have to worry about fouling out. It is obvious he has good chemistry with this team.
You don't have to go to another teams thread. You can do it right here. Name the player? Lillard? Yep. CJ? Yep. Nurk? Yep. Aminu? Yep. Harkless? Yep. Meyers (multiple threads)? Yep. Do we want to try Evan Turner? Sure thing. How about bench roll players? Yep all there. How about the coach? Like 8 different threads by the same poster? Yep. Would the GM be off limits? Like 10 threads by the same two or three posters? Yep! You would think this team was complete "GARBAGE".
To be fair, sadly, they have been garbage in the Playoffs when it counted recently. Wish it were n so.
The tenth person may not know yet the other nine commented. I dont skim threads then go back and choose posts to comment on. I comment as i read, so i rarely know if someone else beat me to the punch or not. Also. There is something to be said about taking heed to a majority of people trying to tell you something. Not sure if you know the history with this guy, but he deserves most of the critique he gets. Not sure if you know but this is the same guy that told this whole forum we dont know shit compared to him about basketball. He also insists the forum is stupid because we refuse to agree with him that thomas robinson doesnt have all star capabilities. And now here he is making yet another innaccurate flamer thread and doesnt stick around to defend or back up his statements and debate them. Ive tried. So you can comment on the comments if you like, but they are all pretty much deserved.
The guy said he's in an institute right now, look at his avatar. I don't know about you guys, but there's a lot of B4Es walking around in every city in the world, telling their eh...unusual? perspective to people passing by. I personally don't feel the urge to educate or laugh at each and every one of them and it's exactly the same for me when it comes to the virtual realm.
I havent bothered to dive into his profile. If thats true its unfortunate but then that leads me to another question. Why would someone who has mental diress enough to require institutionalization have access to social media? That would sewm counter oroductive to mental health improvement. Plus ive learned to take profiles with a grain of salt. You know what a troll is right?
I’ll believe that because i dont know, and say fair enough. But i still question how that would help stabalize a mental state. I mean, social media is as crazy as crazy gets. I mean do they really think this is a place for unstable minds? Lol
