Politics Enough with the Hillary cult: Her admirers ignore reality, dream of worshipping a queen

The voters' will.

SMH

 

This is why Bernie is insane. The red line is realistic.

http://fiscalfactcheck.crfb.org/analysis-of-the-sanders-single-payer-offsets/

 

John King on CNN saying if Trump wins Ohio and Michigan, he wins the election.

And Florida.

 

I started with 2012 actual results. Flipped 3 states.

Latest polls in those 3 states:
Colorado Trump 48.3 Clinton 46.3
Florida Trump 43.0 Clinton 46.7 (barely outside MOE)
Ohio Trump 42.2 Clinton 46.0 (latest is Clinton +3, MOE is 3.2)

Trump needs to flip 8 more EVs to win under this scenario.

Iowa, 6 EVs Trump 43 Clinton 43.8
Nevada 6 EVs Trump 45 Clinton 48.9
Minnesota 10 EVs Trump 40.4 linton 45.9

 

I thought you were saying it was going to be a Trump landslide? Seems like you are having trouble even coming up with a scenario where he wins.

barfo

 

No, you made it up that I said or believe it's a trump landslide.

I had no trouble coming up with a scenario he wins.

Three states very close he can flip. 3 more only a tad less close he can win.

 

Didn't make it up, but I may have misremembered. I apologize for mischaracterizing your position.

Heck, I'm only 270 votes from being president myself. Just need to get on the ballot.

barfo

 

And yet, it changed direction today and you didn't mention it.

I do see a trend.

barfo

 

6.5.

She's killing it.

 

Being ahead by 6.5% is a bad thing now?

Oh, right, the polls are skewed. I should remember that each time I see President Romney on TV.

barfo

 

As of 2013, an infamous hacker is known to have read Hiliar's emails sent to/from her server. And even earlier emails, dating back to 2005. This link below is dated prior to the revelation of Hiliar's crimes.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/sidney-blumenthal-email-hack-687341

The hacker claims he hacked into the server itself, and it was easy.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ifer-breached-clinton-server-it-was-easy.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hacker-guccifer-i-got-inside-hillary-clinton-s-server-n568206

As someone who's done his share of internet security, I can vouch that using the tools he mentions are exactly how hackers work.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/u...said-to-show-no-evidence-of-hacking.html?_r=0

NYTimes apologizes for Hiliar claiming the server security logs show no sign of hacking. What morons.

The first thing a hacker does is wipe out or replace the security logs.

http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/154709/171/

Another type of rootkit is at the kernel level. These are harder to find and remove because one can't trust even the kernel on which the rootkit has been installed on. They have the ability to delete logs to hide the intruders tracks and even replace system calls.

...

Another technique which a rootkit can use is to delete a log entry on the system so there will be no log entry of the attackers activities. Also, to hide the attackers tracks the rootkit can replace standard Unix programs such as ps to not show the processes which the rootkit is running.


Another of her string of serial lies debunked.

 

6.5 is 6.5. It's hardly showing she's entitled to win.

 

Entitled?

That's a weird statement.

Why would any polling average show entitlement?

barfo

 

So you know enough about hacking to also claim to have hacked Hillary's server. I'll call Fox News and see how much they'll pay to interview you.

 

I know how to defend against certain attacks.

 

You know enough to convince Fox News that you hacked Hillary. You could be famous!

 

Suuuuuure.

The hacker isn't making up the techniques, and he is in jail for hacking.

I don't think he's for Trump. I agree with him that Hiliar is a clown. The NYTimes piece is embarrassingly bad for journalism that's supposed to be high standard.

 

So if not hacking, what is it that you are in for?

barfo

 

No comment.