ESPN 1000 in CHI is "reporting" CHI/DET/POR rumor

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by BrianFromWA, Jul 7, 2010.

  1. noknobs

    noknobs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    4,911
    Likes Received:
    6,292
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Since we'll trade for CP3 right around when hell freezes over I'd have to assume this'll be before.

    Talent wise it's good for the Blazers, but I'll miss Joel and it makes the health of our two remaining centers that much more important. All I can say though is Batum better get 30 min a night, preferably as a starter.
     
    Last edited: Jul 7, 2010
  2. noknobs

    noknobs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    4,911
    Likes Received:
    6,292
    Trophy Points:
    113
    !! I just spit up all over my keyboard. Do you actually believe that's a fair trade for Portland? That would be horrible.
     
  3. BGrantFan

    BGrantFan Suspended

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    0
    One question ... WHY?

    Batum is more productive than Deng right now, and he has two more years on his rookie contract. Is the plan for Nic to become the back-up?
     
  4. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,197
    Likes Received:
    15,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That would be nice, but I just don't see why NO would trade CP3 for Deng when the contract is only 2-3 million a year difference
     
  5. EGame

    EGame "You're the only one of these fools I trust"

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2009
    Messages:
    10,976
    Likes Received:
    3,630
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Okay this rumor can die now. If Portland seriously wants Deng, and has another trade including Batum for hopefully a young promising talent, fine. Otherwise this trade rumor can fuck off.
     
  6. RoyToy

    RoyToy Clown Town

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,977
    Likes Received:
    297
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Only if KP made deals like this....

    :crazy:
     
  7. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,976
    Likes Received:
    145,237
    Trophy Points:
    115
    If that happens we'll have a rally for you Gramps!
     
  8. Public Defender

    Public Defender brigadier general

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2008
    Messages:
    589
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    asking questions
    Location:
    In the shadow of the Mother Ship
    I'm not sure what's not to like about this deal.

    Luol Deng is a better SF than anyone we have. Yes, Batum is getting better - but Deng averaged 18 points and 7 boards last year, and is a career 47% shooter (Batum averaged less than half those numbers, 8 points and 3 boards, though his percentage is as good as Deng's).

    And the Blazers would give up who? Jerryd Bayless - whom I like, but he is yet to really solidify a role on the Blazers, and Joel Przybilla - whose primary value is as an expiring contract, considering the uncertainty of his injury and the Blazers' depth in the frontcourt.

    I'd say if this is part of a bigger deal to significantly upgrade the PG spot, then fine (but I'm one of the biggest skeptics of the likelihood of a CP3 trade). If it's just to acquire a better veteran at SF, then I say do it. The only way I don't do it is if the Blazers seriously think there's a better deal out there to be had. I doubt there is.
     
    Last edited: Jul 7, 2010
  9. BGrantFan

    BGrantFan Suspended

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In terms of PER and other production stats, Batum coming off of a major injury was better than Deng, and he is a fraction of the cost. Deng may have gone for 18/7, but he'd better not come close to those numbers as a Blazer, because that would mean more productive and efficient players like Roy, Aldridge, Oden, and Miller aren't getting the ball as often.

    Deng's a good player, but his contract is ridiculous for a 15-16ish PER player who has a history of injury.
     
  10. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,778
    Likes Received:
    27,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No way we can make this deal. I mean we don't even have a GM?

    In all seriousness, Deng is better than Batum is right now. Deng is also big enough to play SOME 4, and Batum is good enough to play in the back court with Roy a little bit. I think between the 1-2-3-4, those three guys could all easily get 30+ minutes a game. Just between the 2-3, there is 96 minutes
     
  11. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,778
    Likes Received:
    27,535
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Doesn't he basically have the same salary and PER, and stats as Aldridge? I am literlly asking cause I don't know all of that.
     
  12. BGrantFan

    BGrantFan Suspended

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Deng's PER is lower than Aldridge's. Plus, my point was Batum is already at Deng's level, since they play the same position.
     
  13. Nhawz

    Nhawz Lickety Brindle

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    757
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Vancouver WA
    DO NOT BRING DENG TO PORTLAND!!
     
  14. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Is there anything new here, or is this the Chicago media hoping that they can make a move after missing out on most of the big FAs?

    I'd do the deal, myself. I like Bayless but Deng is better and I think that Elliot Williams can take over for whatever role Bayless was going to play.

    Whether Deng starts or backs up the 3 and 4 spots (like a more well-rounded Travis Outlaw) doesn't really matter to me... he's a good player and at age 25 he both has room to improve AND is right at the same age as Roy and Aldridge so could fit nicely into the core.

    Ed O.
     
  15. BGrantFan

    BGrantFan Suspended

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's easy to say now, but what about next year when Oden gets a new contract, and what about the year after when Batum gets a new contract? I just don't see how Deng makes sense due to his contract.
     
  16. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    We're going to be over the cap, irrespective of whether Deng is on the team or not. Unless there's a huge shift with no grandfathering in the CBA, or unless the Blazers' ownership group suddenly gets much more frugal, whether we have Deng making $13m/year or Webster making $4m/year doesn't seem like a huge difference to me.

    Ed O.
     
  17. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree 100%. Here's why:

    Deng does not have 3-point range on his jump shot (career .309). Nate's isolation based offense depends on having guys who can hit an open 3 when Roy kicks out to them with the shot clock expiring.

    We've already lost Blake, Outlaw and Webster. Rudy is likely gone, and if we get Deng, it will take minutes from Batum (or possibly even lead to him being traded), one of our few remaining 3-point threats.

    Nate's offense would suck even worse without an assortment of decent 3-point shooters.

    On the other hand, Deng to Portland would likely lead to Nate being fired my mid-season as the team struggles to score. So, maybe it's not such a bad thing after all.

    BNM
     
  18. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,196
    Likes Received:
    30,335
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    Like most rumors involving the Blazers that come out of other cities, there doesn't seem to be much in the way of a benefit to Portland in this deal. We get a SF that isn't significantly better than Batum is right now and we lose the cap flexibility that Joel's contract provides to look at other trades that might actually make the team better.
     
  19. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    I seriously doubt the deal gets done if LeBron doesn't sign with the Bulls.
     
  20. Peaceman

    Peaceman Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2009
    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Wilsonville
    Can we please quit saying every deal means we are trying to get CP3. That deal died and there is absolutely no rumors or any news to indicate that deal is being revisited. We had a window and nearly got Paul, and now it seems every rumor thread has some CP3 element with no sources or links to a deal. Just because Portland is looking at a SF, doesn't mean Nic is leaving or we are after CP3.
    Deng is a very good player and better then Bayless and could play along side of Nic if needed. Nic could play the 2, Roy the 1 in some situations. He is paid too much, but Portland will not be under the salary cap anytime soon, so it is not a huge deal. Deng would be a very good 6 man with lots of minutes.
     

Share This Page