I think it means he was good enough to stick with a MLB team for 9 seasons. He even played full time in some of those.
Right. I suppose it all depends on how you define full time. In his illustrious 9-year career, Mario Mendoza never had enough plate appearances (502) to qualify for a batting title. Not that it matters, but tat's what MLB considers a full time player. The most plate appearances Mendoza ever had was 401 in 1979. That year he hit .198 for a last place team. If that's your definition of "good", it explains a lot. BNM
Example: 148 games played in a season. 2.5 AB/game. Mendoza's glove is my definition of good. Crabbe's .420 3pt shooting is my definition of good.
That's still not a full time player. He split time with Larry Milbourne that year. Now you're just making my point for me. That Crabbe, like Mendoza is a 1-trick pony that has one skill that keeps him around in spite of his other deficiencies. Again, that 1979 season you keep referring to, Mendoza batted .198 for a last place team. I don't want the NBA equivalent of Mario Mendoza starting for my team, because if he is, it means my team isn't very good. BNM
The problem is, you're impying that all these players are roughly the same. They're not...there's a wide spread in quality between a Batum or Redick vs. a Crabbe or Rivers. If Crabbe were near the bottom of the list, where Rivers is, that wouldn't be so bad. Instead, he's up near Batum and ahead of Fournier, players that are much better. I think even with a bit of a bump up in the salary cap, Crabbe's deal is going to stand out as bad. Middleton is a good example of a contract signed that may have seemed high at the time, but will age really well. Crabbe's isn't, in my opinion.
Agreed. While Crabbe's (and Turner's) contracts may moderate over time, the thing that stands out to me is that Crabbe and Turner are the only two players in the top 10 on that list that are not full time starters (when healthy). We have two grossly overpaid bench players - and our bench sucks. So yeah, the contracts may look less bad overtime, but I don't think they will ever look good. BNM
went by this: I don't understand why some of you guys love to break my balls every time i make a small mistake in a language which isn't my native language. I actually do want to get correction via PM because i want to get better at this language, but i hate these rude,condescending jabs in public.
This was the first summer of the new TV contract money. Many stars orchestrated their free agency to correspond with it. And many teams were flush with cap space to bid up the contracts of the non stars. Wait until this next summer when there will be another class of non stars getting big deals. Our salary structure will be the norm.
Unless you edited, you spelled correctly. I think he was laughing at no panicking. And agreeing with you it was a panic or laughing at you for thinking no was panicking. I don't think it had anything to do with your literacy.
It was meant as a good-natured jest, not a rude condescension. Your skills are such that it is easy to forget that English isn't your primary language.
English isn't your first language? You certainly had me fooled. Your writing is better than most of us who spend our time on this board. Of course, it's not a real high bar we set. So, if you don't mind me asking, what is your first language and where are you from?
Thanks, guys. Sometimes i feel a little incompetent to write on these boards so i appreciate your posts. Hebrew, Israel. (pretty please: no politics discussions). Funny story: a few months ago i saw a guy wearing a Blazers hoodie at my neighborhood's basketball court, turns out he's a Blazers fan too! and we have the same first name lol.
This is awesome and a failure all at once.. Why hasn't this guy joined the forum yet?? Come on man, step up your game!!!!
Rumor is that the King are going to offer Boogie a $200 mil contract - $40 mil/year seems ungodly steep for ANYONE.