Defeating a bunch of half wits with guns would be like squashing a bug. It's been done before with not much trouble.
Just give the rest of us a heads up when this takes place - the gun people vs the US govt. We’ll come back after the bloodshed and you all get it figured out.
It hasn't happened at the national level in the US. That's part of the point of the 2nd ammendment. They wouldn't allow a problem to get that big, as it's a fight the government cannot win with an armed population. But again, that's just one reason for the second ammendment. Making it seem like that's the only reason people might need to defend themselves is a perversion of the ammendment.
I don't understand what point you are trying to make. With the 2nd ammendment allowing for an armed population this will never happen. It's not possible.
you will know. You are part of the people trying to get the government to remove guns. You will be on the government side. you will know…
everyone will react differently i suppose. Scared may be a reaction for many. point still stands. If it happens, its because you are looking to take guns away from people for illogical reasons.
No, it isn't. The Second Amendment has a singular, clearly stated purpose: To deter/prevent or counter the threat of America's military being used against American Citizens by a corrupt or conquered American government. Any talk about defense against home invaders, muggers and rapists is a modern political red herring designed to hide the sole reason for it's creation and existence. For people who can't understand 1700's English, it simply says "Because America needs a national military to defend us from other countries, American Citizens need to be able to defeat that military force should it ever be used against them. That's it. Nothing else. The multiple debates leading to the precise wording and enactment of the Second Amendment made this perfectly clear.
And again the only govt that is fucked up enough where this would be a concern is if it’s Trumpy and in that case all the gun nuts would be on the govt side. I am not too worried about a Bernie Sanders or Pete Buttigieg attempt to kill citizens with our own military.
And again Trump isn't the one trying to take guns away. So you are straight up wrong on this. Its you are those who share your views, which would be the left. Not the right. So by your own evidence, guns would be used to fend off a leftist government thing to remove rights like the 2nd amendment from the citizen’s. You've said people should die for their opinions. I l, for one, would be very concerned if people who thought like you ran the government. Id rise up against you if you tried to enact your opinions through laws. So no, the right isn't the concern. Its the left.
Please post the source to prove this statement? https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/United_States_of_America_1992?lang=#141 I see nothing about the sole purpose being war with our own government.
For the billionth time nobody is trying to take your guns away. Nobody ever will. Nobody can. But the nitwits think this is going to happen, so they are gearing up for a hostile Democrat takeover of the nation by stockpiling AR15 are the sane ones. Got it.
No one is trying to take guns from responsible gun owners who follow the law. That's just fear mongering by conservative politicians to get in office and trying to keep power. It worked all too well and now the right and left are practically enemies.
for the gazillionth time one meed look no fiterh than this forum to find individuals who would like to remove guns. No one has tried yet… until they do. all the talk a out gun laws and its bad people who like them lead gun owners to want to be prepared. Your own obsession with those who owns guns is causing them to do the very thing you don't like. Maybe if every time a shooting happens people Don't try to dumb down gun owners, then gun owner ls would feel a potential threat to thier right to own guns. you are fueling the fire you want put out…. If everytime a shooting happens the left would focus on the shooter instead of the gun then maybe gun owners might not feel people are coming after thier guns. its the illogical focus on guns and not the shooter that makes the right push back. if the focus was on the shooter and not the guns, the right would not push back and likely help in trying to get guns out of the hands of those with mental issues. Until the left addresses the problem at its root (which is mental instability, not how many guns are out there) then the right is gonna push back.
oh yes they are. just read this forum. You cant be serious withthis. Read my other post i just made. Many people are trying and want guns taking away. Through illegal action? Of course not. But its only legal until the line is crossed. The opinion is guns are bad and should be removed. By the left continually dismissing the mental aspect and blaming guns, its a clear sign people want and might try to take guns away. To deny that is not keeping it real with whats going on. Period.
