no, no, we need to take the first guy who says yes, so that a poster here will be able to mock them for hiring an underqualified candidate.
And in all seriousness, if that group were good enough to simply win a freaking playoff series, I'd be thrilled.
Not sure why you are laughing? The Blazer PR machine....er front office staff have told us it takes time to find the right guy. I have faith in them
say yes to.....being interviewed, like Sund turned down? Seems like we have interviewed a few. So about a year ago, to answer that question. If you mean when will one say yes to accepting the job, I guess we'd have to make a legitimate offer to a candidate for them to say yes.
No, I know. You totally had Miller's presentation down to a "T" though. It was awesome. So I was giving you props.
Again, further proof you have Miller down to a "T". The guy really thinks we're all stupid. But that only applied to about 75% of this board (and other Blazers fans) for buying into the organization's shit.
Because they owe Durant/Westbrook/Perkins a combined $37M next year and $40M the year after, and Harden is going to command close to a max deal when he becomes an RFA next summer. Rather than have 4 players take up essentially their entire salary cap, they trade him for two lottery picks and a talented prospect. In this NBA, with the current CBA, not unreasonable at all.
I have a good mix going. Thew people I think are stupid think I'm stupid as well, so it's a good balance
If Beal measures close to a real SG, he's the way to go. If not Lamb would be a good gamble. Gordon has all the skill in the world, but has played less and less games each year he's been in the league. Do we really want that?
