Re: NBA: BOSTON (16-2) at CHICAGO (6-11) <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rwj)</div><div class='quotemain'></p> Pierce, Allen, and KG, didn't do too well offensively, but Rondo had a crazy game and drove by Gordon any time he wanted. That was the difference and the main reason the Celtics won in my opinion. In Gordon't defense, I'm not sure Duhon or Hinrich can stay in front of Rondo, either.</p> I probably wouldn't have had Wallace guard KG down the stretch - I knew eventually KG was going to post up and hit a dagger - but Wallace was playing so well it would have been a shame to sit him. It's hard to fault Skiles for staying with Wallace. And it's not like we could take Nocioni or Deng off the floor for Joe Smith with our offense struggling.</p> Tough loss.</p> </div></p> Yeah, Rondo killed us. There are those guys like Rondo, Parker, etc. who are just going to get past pretty much every guard. Where we struggled with Rondo was our big (Wallace) did a horrendous job in his help defense.</p> </p>
Re: NBA: BOSTON (16-2) at CHICAGO (6-11) That's another luxury of havin 3 studs. It opens the game up for guys like Rodno, Perkins, etc.</p>
