GMO not a threat:

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by Eastoff, Oct 1, 2013.

  1. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    The solution for big cities is having the sq ft farming on top of commercial buildings. Supplement aquaponics in blocks and you will have a coop to supply the vegetables for the community. But none of that will happen. People would rather put up skyscrappers
     
  2. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [​IMG]

    They're not doing it right, but at least they tried.
     
  3. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    and I'm worried less about carbon being released into the atmosphere than about the tons and tons of quality soil being petro-chemical and pesticide-saturated before being washed down the Mississippi. It's a bit harder to farm on bedrock.
     
  4. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    100% agree with that!
     
  5. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Yeah it's the want to move in the right direction that's a good thing. Right now the general public has absolutely no idea on how poisoned most foods are. If people would just learn a little more about nutrition, basic ecology (really not that hard), and recycling; we'd be much healthier, happier and less stressed.
     
  6. blue9

    blue9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    10,729
    Likes Received:
    7,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Precisely. I thought of it as an "added bonus", but even if it's carbon neutral that doesn't detract from the other positives.
     
  7. Further

    Further Guy

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    11,099
    Likes Received:
    4,039
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Stuff doer
    Location:
    Place
    bingo, and blue9 was his name-O.

    One of the big problems is that no matter what what reasons we choose, it's going to be real hard to actually make a change, a national or global change. The vast majority of people are going to go with whatever is easier on their pocketbook. If I can make a dinner for 5 bucks using GMO that would be $10 using local farm, it's really hard to argue against that.

    I don't know what the answer is, I want healthy, community conscious, environmentally friendly, cheap and plentiful food. But that's now really possible.
     
  8. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    Nature is perfection.

    Man has never improved on nature, for that very reason.
     
  9. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I knew you were a closet christian!!!!
     

Share This Page