No the only truth to that is God didn't take the money. The comment about not existing is merely your opinion.
I have a friend on facebook that is beyond a fundamentalist - and this came out of nowhere. I have some screenshots of his rants about the lake of fire. He's the epitome of what turns people off/away from religion.
Ah okay... So since we can't see the first self replicating molecule, it must have not existed. Your logic is flawed
Really?! Please give me a link of the empirical evidence that observed the first self replicating molecule?
Look at one of your hairs under the microscope. Self replicating molecules everywhere. There didn't have to be a first "one" though. If you start two aquaponic systems at the same time, they both might produce (whatever) at the same time.
Ah way to dodge. I requested the "first" self replicating molecule. I knew you would try and use novice attempts with what we see today. The first self replicating molecule is the special one. It's the true "missing link". Without it, the entire theory is as real as the spaghetti monster spewing all over your face to form little Dennys.
I'm long past trying to understand how you get it so wrong, consistently. If there were a billion primordial puddles of goo where the first self-replicating molecules formed, there wouldn't be just one of them. The thing is, we can't go back in time and see it happen. Those puddles of goo may have sat there for a hundred thousand years for the processes that formed the first self-replicating molecules to form. This means you can't produce it in a lab because the scientist who started the experiment would be dead for a hundred thousand years before it completed. There's no dodge to it.
Ding ding ding!!! Thank you Denny for proving how idiotic your concept that God didn't grab the money because he doesn't exist. It's neat how easily I can lure you using your ego against you. Thanks for playing
Mags, given that we have naturally self-replicating molecules now which would you say is a simpler explanation? That a "first" one arose naturally from circumstances that we don't yet understand (but may at some point)? Or that an all-mighty designer for which there is no scientific evidence of existence magically put it together? You should be able to forgive scientists if they take the former as their base assumption.
The logic is still "assumptions". It's easy for an existing "self replicating molecule" to reproduce, mutate, etc. it's quite another feat to have one naturally manifest from non-genetic coded material. Both cannot be observed easily. But one "Denny" can be content because they see other self replicating molecules as proof, while the other is content with God, because they feel his presence everyday. And we may, at some point, observe God himself!
Well now that brings up another question. When we can see God himself, will those that say he does not exist, be able to see him when he is there? They do not see him now and men wiser than I, have seen his work everywhere.
ding ding ding - evidence of self replicating molecules that you admit exist vs. not a shred of evidence of god or leprechauns.
Lmao! Have you heard the term "can't see the forest through the trees?" Your ego is getting the best of you. The point is, you can't prove that the first self replicating molecule could somehow miraculously manifest from non genetic encoded material. Even with all the primordial soup in the universe, not a single one has been observed. Let me repeat it again. Show me empirical evidence that you can create a "self replicating molecule from non genetic material". I will give you all the primordial soup you need. So the point is this... Your bold claim that God wouldn't grab the money because he does not exist, is exactly the same as one claiming that "non genetic material can materialize into genetic material without using genetic material" has not been observed so it must not exist. Your tuition has expired. Class is over....
I believe that everyone in this entire universe will one day be in front of God. They may still deny him, or maybe they will try and blame him for not being so open with his presence.
I can't prove you were born, yet here you are posting. I'd call that evidence you were born. For the same reason, we are sure that self replicating molecules evolved. There is not a shred of evidence of any god. Never has been.
