Harkless resolves after Crabbe decision?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Blazinaway, Jul 10, 2016.

  1. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I suppose it depends on how you define "significant assets". Is overpaying our 10th man and going over the LT threshold this year worth it given the possible future implications? I don't think so. Nobody else has even made Harkless an offer. If we overpay him and he's not part of our regular rotation, I don't see his trade value increasing. Harkless on a reasonable contract could be a trade asset, although the last time he was traded he was still on very reasonable rookie deal and only fetched a top 55 protected 2nd round pick (aka: nothing). An overpaid Harkless is not a valuable trade commodity. Just the opposite.

    BNM
     
    Eastoff and HailBlazers like this.
  2. Blazinaway

    Blazinaway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,973
    Likes Received:
    4,253
    Trophy Points:
    113
    with the "overpays" we already did this summer in perhaps Turner and Crabbe IMO we simply cannot overpay Hark with the need to pay CJ big bucks next summer, just can't do it especially with a team that has not proven and does yet look like a "real" contender, a good team yes but not a real contender IMO
     
  3. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,976
    Likes Received:
    10,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    The thing is, I believe we will pay the LT next year, to keep the assets together, as you say.

    You don't want to have 2 of the 4 years on the books at the end of next year. I think I'd rather keep Plums than Harkless if it came down to that, and paying the LT.

    The way Harkless stays is on the QO or if he signs a deal that keeps us under LT (considering bonuses that could push us over). If he does sign a small enough deal, it forces our hand to trade (whoever) to clear space in two years, which is fine.

    Mo has a lot of potential, but he wasn't THAT good, was he? Is he going to bet on himself and take the QO? Fine if he does. If he has a huge breakout season, we can still pay him the most, no hard feelings. And we'd deal with the 1st year of LT next year.
     
    HailBlazers and Boob-No-More like this.
  4. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,613
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The bolded is speculation. We have no idea. And if Aminu is now being considered a PF, Harkless would be our 2nd backup for the wing positions. There will be plenty of minutes for him, IMO.
     
  5. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well no one has formally made an offer.

    Not really. Aminu will still see plenty of time at the back up 3 and Crabbe will play the 3 next to Dame and C.J. in small ball situations. I see Turner getting the bulk of the minutes at the 3, followed by Aminu and Crabbe. Harkless sucks at the 2, with no handle and a weak jump shot. He should never see minutes there. C.J. starts. with Crabbe getting the bulk of the back up minutes followed by Turner. That puts us three deep at the wing positions without Harkless being part of the regular rotation. Who, exactly does Harkless steal minutes from? Turner? Aminu? Crabbe? They are all better than he is.

    BNM
     
  6. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,613
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If Aminu sees lots of minutes at the 3, then sure. If Aminu is primarily playing the 4--which Olshey indicated is the plan--then we have Dame, CJ, Crabbe, and Turner at the 1/2/3. All depends on how many mpg you expect from those 4. If 35 mpg for Dame/CJ and 28 mpg for Crabbe/Turner, that leaves 18 mpg at the 3 for Harkless. Not unreasonable.
     
  7. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, earn it back. Minutes are earned, not given, based on quality of play. If Mo is pissed about losing a starting role that was only his because Terry moved Vonleh to the bench, come into training camp and preseason and mop up the floor with Turner. If you do, I guarantee Terry will give you the minutes you deserve. If you don't, you have no right to mope about losing your starting role.

    Mo is reportedly asking for more money than we gave Turner. If you want more money than the guy in front of you, you damn well better outplay him. If you don't/can't, STFU.

    BNM
     
    BBert, HailBlazers and Denny Crane like this.
  8. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,613
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Besides this completely unsubstantiated and unsupported article that was linked earlier in this thread, have there been any other "reports" on the contract Harkless is seeking? I'm not putting any stock in a rumor posted by "Sai M." from morningnewsusa.com.
     
  9. KingSpeed

    KingSpeed Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    62,905
    Likes Received:
    22,117
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    actor
    Location:
    New York
    How do you know he hasn't received an offer? It only has to go public if he signs the offer sheet.
     
    Denny Crane likes this.
  10. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Aminu will start at the 4, but we also have a logjam there with Davis and Leonard as back ups. Meyers will also see minutes at the 5, but we have Plumlee and Ezeli in front of him there. So, that means more minutes at the 3 for Aminu, and that shouldn't come as a surprise. He started the bulk of our games at the 3 last season and was almost exclusively a SF for his entire NBA career, until Terry benched Vonleh at the end of last season.

    He's a better 3 than Mo (which is why he was starting ahead of him) and when Ed or Meyers plays the 4, Aminu will see plenty of time at the 3 - especially with Davis. Terry likes to have at least three 3-point shooters on the court at all times. You can't play Mo and Ed together with Turner and/or Plumlee or Ezeli because that leaves you with, at most two 3-point threats on the court.

    I don't like to get into specific minute breakdowns, because it will vary night to night depending on match ups and who's playing well, but Turner will start and get the bulk of the minutes at the 3, which is really the only position Mo can play effectively. I fully expect Turner to get at least 32 MPG so Terry can always have at least two ball handlers/distributors on the floor (other than garbage time, when it doesn't matter). Aminu and Crabbe will split the back up SF minutes.

    With the logjam at the 4, I don't expect Aminu to play more than 20 MPG at PF. In the playoffs, we didn't have either Meyers or Ezeli. That meant Aminu played a lot of minutes at the 4, because Ed Davis, our only other healthy big man worthy of PT, had to play exclusively the back up 5. Now Meyers is back and we added Ezeli. That means Ed Davis will move back to his natural back up PF role, with Ezeli getting the bulk of minutes at the back up 5. Meyers will get minutes backing the 4 and 5 spots. Effectively adding two more big men capable of playing the 4 will reduce Aminu's time at PF.

    So, I still see the SF position divided between the starter Turner, with Aminu as his primary back up and Crabbe getting minutes there in small ball line ups. And that's why Mo is at a disadvantage, he can really only play one position effectively - SF. Turner can play the 3 and 2, Aminu the 3 and 4, C.J. the 2 and 1 and even Meyers will see back up minutes at both the 4 and 5. With three players, all better, all more versatile, ahead of Mo at the 3, I just don't see where he gets his minutes.

    BNM
     
  11. 0-Our!

    0-Our! Noob-ish

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2015
    Messages:
    908
    Likes Received:
    805
    Trophy Points:
    93
    ^ 1 of the reasons why I think Neil may have offered Moe a 2 yr. ~$13 million/yr. (or... perhaps this much for 4 years...?) w/ a 2nd yr. opt out or 1yr. @ ~$9million; ^ is why Moe would even consider offers like these
     
  12. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,976
    Likes Received:
    10,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    I don't believe it's possible to guess who's getting what minutes. It's really going to depend on situations and who's playing well for us. I don't worry about it, either. We're blessed with talent and depth, and Stotts will put the right guys out there for the right reasons.

    Starting doesn't matter much. We started Vonleh most of the season, and he didn't finish games. If the starter is having a bad day, we have guys who can step up.

    Not having a true star 3rd option means we're going to see guys off the bench have big games. Each night it may be someone different than the last game.
     
  13. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    Boy, are you poor at context. What you just wrote is the same as I did. Except it's Harkless, not Boston substitute Turner, who has earned the starting job here. It should be decided in training camp. Instead, Olshey announced that Turner would take Harkless' job.
     
  14. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    67,840
    Likes Received:
    66,592
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then it stands to reason that Harkless takes Gerald Henderson's job...it's only fair damnit!
     
    Orion Bailey likes this.
  15. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    Harkless isn't a forward-guard like Henderson and Turner. Turner took the Henderson skill-mix spot, except that Turner is promised to start.
     
  16. Trackjack

    Trackjack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2015
    Messages:
    2,914
    Likes Received:
    1,910
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If I was the coach I be kind of piss at the GM. When does GM declare who starts I really thought that's why they hire a coach.
     
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2016
    BBert likes this.
  17. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,976
    Likes Received:
    10,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    I'm sure they work together as a team on such things.
     
  18. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    67,840
    Likes Received:
    66,592
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm sure training camp will take care of roster adjustments and seeing as how some of these guys are new, the guys who know the system should have a leg up early in the season. Gerald Henderson didn't play much until January. If Harkless is signed, we're a really deep team and who doesn't want to see training camp be a dogfight? I do...if Mo beats Crabbe or Turner, he'll have to earn it. Crabbe could just as easily take the starting spot from Turner.
     
    Orion Bailey and HailBlazers like this.
  19. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,536
    Likes Received:
    38,600
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    If he won't accept anything less than a max contract then he'll be out of the league after his QO is up.
     
  20. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,613
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Again, there is no legitimate reason to believe that he is even asking for a max, let alone issuing an ultimatum for one.
     

Share This Page