Trade Hart/Winslow/Didi/Keon/pick or CJ/Norm/Nance/Roco?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by SharpesTriumph, Apr 18, 2022.

?

What would you rather have?

  1. CJ, Norm, Nance, Roco (bird rights)

    24 vote(s)
    40.0%
  2. Hart, Winslow, Didi, Keon, MIL pick

    36 vote(s)
    60.0%
  1. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,527
    Likes Received:
    16,553
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, I replied. Didn't see your post yesterday for some reason.

    In fact, there is still no notification that you replied to my post at all. I'm not sure why that would be.
     
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2022
  2. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,527
    Likes Received:
    16,553
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It sounded to me liked Olshey shit canned people who were ahead of him and Cronin just kind of rose through the ranks that way.

    Which could just mean he's smart enough to do his job well and not to get into a dick measuring contest with his boss.
     
  3. Tince

    Tince Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    15,259
    Likes Received:
    14,715
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I do. I don't recall the alternate trade that you said was on the table being sourced and reported, which is what I was asking you to share. I agreed with you that I would've taken the trade you brought up.
     
  4. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,051
    Likes Received:
    30,033
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    I think this is exactly right. Everyone knew Cronin had to get under the tax threshold and there was no realistic way to do that without trading CJ and Norm.
     
    Hoopguru and Phatguysrule like this.
  5. SharpesTriumph

    SharpesTriumph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2018
    Messages:
    10,377
    Likes Received:
    9,334
    Trophy Points:
    113
    False. The Blazers could've traded Roco on his own and got under the tax, they were only a couple million over, not tens of millions.

    There were even ways to keep all of Roco, CJ, Norm, Nance and traded away McLemore, Snell, Zeller, sign scrubs to small prorated rest of the season contracts and duck the tax. The Rockets did this a few years ago (with a compentent GM like Morey).

    The Blazers with a "cap guru" leading the franchise couldn't figure this out, instead bending over backwards to other GM's.

    I'm not saying the Blazers should have made no trades at the deadline, clearly the team was bad and should have been making moves to add talent either now or long term. But the justification of taking shit returns on talent because the Blazers "had" to do it to get under the tax is ridiculous.
     
    UKRAINEFAN and blazerkor like this.
  6. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,051
    Likes Received:
    30,033
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    Technically, that’s true, but they also wanted to position themselves for moves they plan to make this summer. Look, I get that Cronin could have gotten more back than he did, but those trades would have likely been for similar players. The old NBA maxim of “don’t trade big for small” is still a thing. Cronin’s plan got dinged up when the Lakers failed to make the playoffs and Paul George got sick. I don’t know that blaming Cronin for that is a legitimate complaint, but he still has options to make necessary moves. He should get the chance to do it, IMO.
     
  7. CJ_is_Gone

    CJ_is_Gone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2022
    Messages:
    2,159
    Likes Received:
    2,235
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I disagree. We were only $3m-$4m over the lux tax line. We could have traded RoCo for someone making $9M or less and be out of the tax.

    I'm sure Phoenix would have been open for a Saric/RoCo swap. Cleveland with a Osman/RoCo swap. Atlanta with Wright. Chicago with DJJ (although Portland would have to find someone else to take DJJ).

    RoCo had enough value that someone would have taken him for straight salary relief. To argue we HAD to trade more assets to get under the lux tax line is asinine.
     
  8. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,701
    Likes Received:
    36,254
    Trophy Points:
    113
    it wasn't just the tax line this season....I think it was obvious the Vulcans ordered Cronin to cut lots of future salary as well. And CJ-Powell-Nance represented 151M in future salary
     
    Idog1976 likes this.
  9. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    15,625
    Likes Received:
    16,769
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't think Cronin should get a chance to do anything more and of course blaming him for the pick being so tenuous is legitimate. If the situation that cost us the pick happened then it's pretty obvious the risk didn't pay off so Cronin gets left holding the bag... he doesn't get to chalk it up to bad luck when there are obvious assets between the pick that didn't convey and the 2025 Bucks pick he let NOLA put conditions on, that could have better salvaged what happened, in case it did.

    It's crazy that so many in here are taking all blame from and wanting to give more chances to a guy that is not only culpable for the return we didn't get on the players we traded this season but also shares the stench of all of Olshey's bungling failures. Why should we still want this guy or anyone associated with the last decade running our team?
     
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2022
  10. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    15,625
    Likes Received:
    16,769
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That being said if Cronin had the kind of backbone it's going to take to manage the expectations of this ownership group he should have been able to convince them and the rest of the league that the only pressing need was to get under the tax (which as a few in here have already said should have been easy) and that if it needed to the dumping of future salary could easily wait until the off season unless we got good value while doing it at the trade deadline.

    Maybe Cronin thought he got good value at the trade deadline but he was the one that said that everyone knew they had to get under the tax and that affected things... either way he hasn't shown himself to be great and since he's not the actual GM, I don't see why we'd make him the permanent GM unless he had done a great job. The idea that there isn't a list of candidates a mile long that would kill to get this job is bullshit... one of them should get the permanent job before a guy who did such a weak job when given the chance and is inseparably tied to all of the things that our front office did we hated over the last decade under Olshey.
     
    oldmangrouch likes this.
  11. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,051
    Likes Received:
    30,033
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    I'm pretty sure that everyone here is aware of your opinion on Cronin. We're all entitled to our own opinions. I was just sharing mine.

    And, BTW, for what little it's worth, I could dig up the posts where I expressed concern that CJ & Company were going to ride their momentum into the playoffs and you assured me that the Clippers/Timberwolves or Lakers were sure to take them out in the play-in. I don't know if Cronin had the leverage to get more protections on the NO pick, but he certainly had reason to think that the odds of it conveying were pretty high. Now he's going to have to work harder to find a trade where he can use the future Milwaukie pick and other assets to accomplish his goals.
     
    blazerkor likes this.
  12. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,272
    Likes Received:
    26,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    His goals are unattainable. That’s the issue. Building around Dame, at 31, is not attainable
     
  13. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,402
    Likes Received:
    6,323
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sometimes, a clean break with the past is what you need. We did it with the coaching staff, and I believe we need to do it with the front office.
     
  14. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,701
    Likes Received:
    36,254
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no, I don't think the Vulcans, without Paul Allen around, are going to be managed in any way by a GM, especially an interim GM.

    Olshey was supposed to be an adept manipulator and manager of ownership, but the Vulcans sunk him as the GM, and did so for cause. That's some hardball shit
     
    Idog1976 likes this.
  15. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,051
    Likes Received:
    30,033
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    That's a reasonable opinion. I would understand completely if the Blazers and Dame decided it was in everyone's best interest to find a good trade and move along. Cronin, Billups and Dame all seem to be of the opinion that they can find the deals that they need to compete. Since none of us make the call on those decisions, all we can do is sit back and watch what happens.
     
    Hoopguru likes this.
  16. Idog1976

    Idog1976 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,709
    Likes Received:
    3,915
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    I look to the stars.
    Location:
    P-Town baby!
    Getting rid of Vulcans/Jody Allen is really more important than our current GM. I'm really, REALLY hoping someone like Phil Knight (Please god!) steps in here and buys the team. Or really any deep-pocketed Billionaire (Musk? Bezos?) who will keep the Blazers in Portland. I want a super-wealthy owner who won't be afraid to spend to win not endorsing Bezos or Musk just straight up looking at how wealthy they are and thinking wow wouldn't it be nice to be back to the good old days of SPAM. Remember when that lead to us getting within 10 minutes of a championship?
     
  17. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,051
    Likes Received:
    30,033
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    Phil’s 84 years old. I don’t know how interested he’s going to be in owning the Blazers. Maybe Elon Musk has a sudden hankering to own an NBA franchise? Nah, he’d move it somewhere.
     
  18. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,701
    Likes Received:
    36,254
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Phil Knight has said before he has no interest in owning the Blazers. he's fine semi-owning the Ducks

    maybe Larry Ellison
     
    e_blazer likes this.
  19. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Musk would fire Cronin and Billups, and put the players in charge of coaching and roster management. First self-driving franchise.

    Probably switch the jersey patch from StormX to SpaceX too.
     
    e_blazer and Hoopguru like this.
  20. blazerfan11

    blazerfan11 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2019
    Messages:
    10,713
    Likes Received:
    10,832
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Bezos would be great. The Blazers could be the first team to travel by rocket ship to their away games.
     
    e_blazer and PtldPlatypus like this.

Share This Page