Politics Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection

‘Legal’ and ‘transparent’ aren’t mutually exclusive.

 

Actually they are...especially in military communications. Definitely in executive branch communications. I believe Trump makes his cabinet sign non disclosure agreements before they take the job..then when fired or after quitting they leave and write a tell all best seller

 

and? What hasn't the inquiry being transparent about? Let's look at the steps

1) House calls for an impeachment inquiry
2) House subcommittees call witnesses (some of which have ignored subpoenas or stonewalled during their testimony like Lewondowski and Barr) and the republicans basically have almost as many reps in the subcommittee. Rudy G has already said he will refuse to turn over any requested documents, just like the White House is doing. How is that being transparent?
3) Once the subcommittees have done their investigations they have said they will have an open hearing to the public and all house members
4) Once all that is done, then they will decide if a vote is necessary and if passed will be sent to the senate.

Tell me how that's not being transparent?

That's pretty much how it's always been done.

 

Law is becoming less and less important in America.

 

I find it hilariously hypocritical that many of Trump's followers are crying foul over this initial part of the inquiry being done behind closed doors when they have done the same thing in the past.

 

You don't know one Trump follower who has done any such thing, in the past or any time. You simply pulled this post directly out from your arse with no value added.

 

Shit, the whole damn White House administration is whining about it and I have seen plenty of trumpers make that statement so don't come in here telling us if we have or haven't heard anything as you simply don;t know. Fuck your obsession with arse.

 

Being anally fixated is probably fixable but wanting to put money on a turd is probably beyond help.

 

You always know when these trumpers start feeling pressure and can't debate as they are just like trump and rather than debate the facts they just start attacking. Kinda funny.

 

There's all kinds of attacking in this forum whether it's direct or passive-aggressive. Good show, guys! Haha

 

You're going to be shocked to hear this but yes, I have Marzy on ignore.

 

Passive-aggressive? That's more my style. When I was a kid being aggressive was not safe. I as a small child and was intimidated by my parents. Not a good combination for a small child.

 

They don't "have" to be, they "chose" to be.

 

Doesn't shock me at all...I also have someone from the Yanks board on ignore.

 

Most of it started in late 2016.

 

Well, I would agree with you, but that would prohibit you from being wrong.

Actually, I'm a bit surprised you didn't go with the ole "I'm rubber, you're glue......" retort.

 

The problem is that they are following House rules and Republican guidlines which say that the inquiry should be done behind closed doors so that witnesses may both feel more free to give unfettered testimony and cannot collaborate with other witnesses thereby tarnishing testimony. Shame of them for following a long held House rules on such testimony.

 

But wait, according to Marzy, that simply isn't true and that you simply "pulled that out of your ass with no value added".

 

No, I did not pull it out of my Marzy. It was said by Trey Gowdy. Maybe Marzy has heard of Gowdy.