How much were these refs paid off tonight?

Stopping or not, his skate/foot was moving forward towards the net and the puck kicked in off of it. And I have seen that "goal" disallowed many many times. That's just the way it is. If I had never seen it disallowed maybe we could talk, but I have seen it happen many times before.

 

Exactly, they just need to be consistent if thats the way theyre going to interpret it. Personally i think guiding and kicking are similar enough and premeditated so both should be disallowed. If its a bang bang deflection thats one thing.

 

I agree. If you will disallow kicks, then to me when a goal goes in like Janssen's did it should be no goal. Otherwise it is way too difficult of a call to make. You then have to get into reading a persons mind or intent, and it becomes way too gray. It should be more black and white, not less.

 

i agree they should just make everything a goal. no more motion or intent or anything like that. any goal off the skate counts.


that was a good goal though by the definition of the rule fyi. its a total judgement call though thats the problem its not a yes or no like it would be on a high stick call.

 

All I know is I have seen that exact same "goal" get disallowed. So to me it should have been no goal, but I also don't think that 1 goal is the reason the game went the way it did.

So you say it is a good goal by the rule, I say that doesn't phase me much because I have seen that goal disallowed in the past AND we are also assuming Janssen didn't intentionally kick it in, which he very well may have or may not have...who knows.

Is what it is.

 

They need to do away with no kicking. .. no batting with a glove... as long as it's not a stick above the crossbar it should count. The kick non kick is so inconsistent

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk