Forum Game If we keep the pick, what position(s) would you like us to draft?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Wizard Mentor, May 28, 2019.

?

Which player position interests you the most

  1. 1/2

    2 vote(s)
    6.5%
  2. 2/1

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 2/3

    1 vote(s)
    3.2%
  4. 3/2

    1 vote(s)
    3.2%
  5. 3/4

    18 vote(s)
    58.1%
  6. 4/3

    7 vote(s)
    22.6%
  7. 4/5

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. 5/4

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. Other (specify)

    2 vote(s)
    6.5%
  1. JDC

    JDC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,296
    Likes Received:
    3,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [​IMG]
     
    VanillaGorilla likes this.
  2. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,378
    Likes Received:
    27,199
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah...?

    A poor man's Corliss Williamson probably wouldn't survive in this NBA.
     
    BonesJones likes this.
  3. JDC

    JDC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,296
    Likes Received:
    3,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We'll see.

    Kabengele comes with a fair share of flaws (doesn't pass, bad positional defender) and is about a year and half older than Grant.
     
    VanillaGorilla likes this.
  4. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    19,174
    Likes Received:
    19,939
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I would be more inclined to try to move up in the draft. In Particular Boston has 3 first round picks. All in a better position than the Blazers. Moving up gives them a better chance to get a solid 3 and D wing. But always take BPA with whatever pick they end up with?
     
    Wizard Mentor and rotary111 like this.
  5. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,378
    Likes Received:
    27,199
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So?

    He's already a beast. His negatives aren't nearly as strong as Williams.
     
    BonesJones likes this.
  6. Wizard Mentor

    Wizard Mentor Wizard Mentor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    13,854
    Likes Received:
    13,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master of Xen Foro
    Location:
    La Grande, OR
    I like the idea in principle, but Boston has 14, 20, 22. Not sure moving up 3 spots moves the needle, and harder to get one of the others.
     
    BonesJones likes this.
  7. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    19,174
    Likes Received:
    19,939
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I was kind of eyeballing #20. That and trying to buy a second rounder.
     
    rotary111 and Wizard Mentor like this.
  8. tester551

    tester551 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    4,037
    Likes Received:
    3,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Whith what assets? Moving up is going to cost something. I dont think the difference in prospects is worth the effort to move up 5 spots.

    I'd personally love to trade back and get both of Phillys 2nds (33 & 34). Theres better flexibility with contracts and you get 2 swings at a the same tier of player
     
    Titan, illmatic99, dviss1 and 2 others like this.
  9. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    19,174
    Likes Received:
    19,939
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nah bro. You ain't gonna get a Tyler Herro or Cameron Johnson or even Grant Williams let alone a Rui Hachimura in the second round. These are the type of players the Blazers need.
    As far as what assets? The Blazers are going to have to give to get. They have some pieces that could work out. It depends on what a teams is looking for? Boston in particular is looking for a solid Big. Think about that? Meyers just dropped 30 on the Warriors in the WCF's. Would you be willing to work out a deal including Meyers Leonard for a chance to move up in the draft and shed some salary?
     
    rotary111 likes this.
  10. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    56,235
    Likes Received:
    54,033
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    I'm usually against this mindset but the more I read about this draft, the more I agree. There have been some second round gems the past few years too. I'd try to get a future pick as well.
     
  11. tester551

    tester551 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    4,037
    Likes Received:
    3,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Herro & Rui are going to get drafted before 20. Johnson & Williams aren't any better prospects than Chuma, Bazley, Luka, or King.

    Chuma & Bazley are my top 2 prospects (even above Rui or Herro).

    The juice isn't worth the squeeze for trading up....

    Recency bias. I'd love to trade Meyers - but there's no way he can be used to move up in the draft.
     
  12. James lamphear

    James lamphear Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2018
    Messages:
    7,860
    Likes Received:
    5,531
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Dealing with Danny might be best thing to he might want you give next 5 year draft picks to get one that how he operates. I know you can't give up consecutive draft 1st round picks but he try make you pay. How do you think why got so many picks now. Trading down is not bad idea it will depends on how good you like Bazley and some of the other players that might be fringe 1st round picks.
     
  13. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    19,174
    Likes Received:
    19,939
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course you don't know any of this. So we will see right?
     
  14. Wizard Mentor

    Wizard Mentor Wizard Mentor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    13,854
    Likes Received:
    13,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master of Xen Foro
    Location:
    La Grande, OR
    From BusinessInsider:
    https://www.businessinsider.com/201...-5#24-philadelphia-76ers-cameron-johnson-f-24

    25. Portland Trail Blazers — Talen Horton-Tucker, G
    [​IMG]
    Talen Horton-Tucker.
    Charlie Neibergall/AP
    School: Iowa State

    Age: 18

    Other possibilities: Luguentz Dort (G, Arizona State), KZ Okpala (F, Stanford), Matisse Thybulle (G, Washington), Brandon Clarke (F, Gonzaga), Cameron Johnson (F, UNC)

    Expert quote: From Parrish: "The 6-5 guard is still only 18 years old; so patience will likely be required. But Horton-Tucker's ability to play multiple positions makes him an interesting prospect."

    Wiz: Positionally, he just doesn't make sense (Ant), even if he is BPA (no idea whether he is or isn't). I'd rather have PF Mfiondu Kabengele who has pro size and can hit the 3, and is slated to go 2 picks later in that same mock draft.
     
    dviss1 likes this.
  15. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,378
    Likes Received:
    27,199
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why is Hachimura dropping in the Mocks??

    The one in the OP has him at 18??? NBAdraft.net has him at 10 now???

    I thought he was a consensus top 5 pick?

    Did something happen at the Combine?
     
  16. hoopsjock

    hoopsjock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    16,302
    Likes Received:
    26,279
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Business Owner
    Location:
    North Plains
    A couple of mocks had him as a top 5 pick at the beginning of the year but most had him later.
     
    kjironman1 likes this.
  17. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    19,174
    Likes Received:
    19,939
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't know either? Top 10 i was thinking but if he is dropping the Blazers better be looking.
     
  18. glazeduck

    glazeduck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,107
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm sure I'm in the minority here, but I want the Blazers to swing for the fences at 25 -- draft the longest, most athletic, highest-potential player on the board, even if he's a project. I'm struggling to remember the last time we had a guy who could make a difference because of elite athleticism/size/length. Who that is I have no idea, don't watch enough college ball anymore to form an opinion.

    I look at next year as likely to be a throw-away year, I'm sure Dame won't let us miss the playoffs, but given the $ situation, I expect Olshey to keep his action to bargain bin diving and likely little to nothing else. Why not use a lost year to develop a raw talent.
     
  19. VanillaGorilla

    VanillaGorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,072
    Likes Received:
    4,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Seems to me that's Bazley, who has been talked about a lot here as this year's Anfernee Simons.
     
    BonesJones and hoopsjock like this.
  20. JDC

    JDC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,296
    Likes Received:
    3,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Kab is not a PF.

    He can run and jump off 2 but doesn't move nearly well enough laterally or when covering ground and changing direction.

    Maybe against 2 big lineups, but isn't that was Zach is for?

    I think Kab has a good chance to be productive and seems to be a very smart kid off the floor. NBA bloodlines as well.

    Just think Grant is the smarter player and a better fit with our roster both now and moving forward.
     
    VanillaGorilla likes this.

Share This Page