<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (STAT @ Dec 2 2006, 11:44 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Chris Paul would be good to have on the Suns. I am sure he would like the run-n-gun style of play we got here, and he would be amazing for when Nash needs to take a break since he is a true point guard and playmaker like Nash is. Besides all that, Nash wouldn't have to play so long and strain his back as much if we had Paul to come in.</div>why the hell would you want another pg? you try to improve on your weakness before you add on to your strengths.
Yeah, STAT. Out of all the players in the NBA right now, even though you have Nash/Banks/Barbosa, you would add Chris Paul? Umm... why? You guys need a center, if I was you I'd add like a Dwight Howard (athletic, can run, great potential, DEFENSE - which your team needs).
Yes, if I was a fan of the suns, I would want either Dwight or Emeka. For me, I would take Emeka. He is a defensive minded center who can also score 17 or more a night. He would totally change the players path once they get in the lane and would help Phoenix's defense out by a great amount. Although Dwight would be a better fit for the offense, Emeka would do leaps and bounds on the defensive end.
Raptors could use:Vince Carter (they need scoring guard)Jason Kidd (need PG to pass to Bosh)Steve Nash (same reason as Kidd)Rip Hamilton (he could fit in Raptors system IMO)Tim Duncan (good team player that would be dominating with Bosh)
Tim Duncan. Best Player in the NBA. Made immediate impact on the Spurs. Knows when to do his thing. Spurs are automatically on the top every year because of him.
I would want Tim Duncan. He would bring leadership and playoff experience. Not too mention he would bring a much needed post presense and great defense. He could become that guy Allen Iverson has always needed on offense, but he also wouldn't kill the chemistry or take away from Iguodalas oppurtunities like Webber has. If we could bring in Duncan(even though it will never happen lol) we could honestly become a championship calibur team just because of him.
Duncan is great but I don't think the Sixers would be immediate title contenders with Duncan. I guess maybe in the east considering all the top teams would be in the bottom half in the west in the seeding. lol
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mavsfan1000 @ Dec 2 2006, 12:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Duncan is great but I don't think the Sixers would be immediate title contenders with Duncan. I guess maybe in the east considering all the top teams would be in the bottom half in the west in the seeding. lol</div>Your right title contenders is a bit of a stretch considering our management would still be horrible and we don't have much playoff experience. I think we could definetly contend to win the East though.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Larry Hughes @ Dec 1 2006, 01:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>PG-WadeSG-HughesSF-JamesPF-GoodenC-Zeek</div>Hmmm. Sure it would be great, but I think Wade and James style of play clashes to much to get the maximum play out of the Cavaliers.I used to want Ray Allen. A shooting two-guard would have been great. But since we have Hughes, I think we need to go for a point. It is hard for me to narrow down to one player, Nash would be nice because he could really set-up the offense, shoot, and create for James and our big men. But he can't defend well, which (guarding the quicker points) is something we struggle against. Then I thought about Iverson, and he would be great, but I think we need a little bit more of a three-point shooter. So, I think I am going to go with Arenas. He is player that can defend and shoot the three.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (drake24 @ Dec 2 2006, 05:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Hmmm. Sure it would be great, but I think Wade and James style of play clashes to much to get the maximum play out of the Cavaliers.I used to want Ray Allen. A shooting two-guard would have been great. But since we have Hughes, I think we need to go for a point. It is hard for me to narrow down to one player, Nash would be nice because he could really set-up the offense, shoot, and create for James and our big men. But he can't defend well, which (guarding the quicker points) is something we struggle against. Then I thought about Iverson, and he would be great, but I think we need a little bit more of a three-point shooter. So, I think I am going to go with Arenas. He is player that can defend and shoot the three.</div>True, but I wouldn't of wanted Allen. I would of wanted Redd instead. I was pulling for him the whole time but then we signed Hughes, I had no idea he was even in the mix I thought we where going for Redd. But Arenas would really work here but if I was not going for Wade, I would of picked Chris Paul. Dude can really play that PG spot well. I would take him over Steve Nash too.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CelticBalla32 @ Dec 1 2006, 10:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Pick one guy to pair up with Paul Pierce right now? Tim Duncan without question. He's great with helping your team build chemistry, he's a leader, he has won 3 titles, he can play both PF and C, he would teach a lot of things to Al Jefferson and Kendrick Perkins, oh Yeah... he's the best big man in the league.A lot of youth still, I know, but Tim Duncan and Paul Pierce would go places.</div>Well I guess I don't really have to post on this thread now. But that would hands down be the best duo in the league.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Larry Hughes @ Dec 4 2006, 02:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>True, but I wouldn't of wanted Allen. I would of wanted Redd instead. I was pulling for him the whole time but then we signed Hughes, I had no idea he was even in the mix I thought we where going for Redd. But Arenas would really work here but if I was not going for Wade, I would of picked Chris Paul. Dude can really play that PG spot well. I would take him over Steve Nash too.</div>I would go for Chris Paul.About the Allen/Redd thing, at the time, I had no idea Redd was going to be this good. So that is why I wanted Allen (I like Allen as well). But I pretty much knew Allen would resign. I thought we had a good chance of getting Redd, but I guess I was wrong.
I would take Kobe Byrant any day, think about Kobe and Bosh, that would be a sick duo. With Kobe's new attitude, I think he would just make every Raptor player better, plus get us an elite starting SG. Also dropping 30 a game wouldnt hurt the Raptors also. I also see him making TJ better, as Kobe has really never played with a good PG for the last couple seasons. As for Bargnani and Garbajosa They would have to fight for minutes under the new system, but competing would help them grow faster.
