If you're not on the L-Train, what are you waiting for?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Blazer Fanatic, Jan 17, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,372
    Likes Received:
    12,498
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh, but that's where you're wrong.
     
  2. Strenuus

    Strenuus Global Moderator Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    50,072
    Likes Received:
    35,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    :MARIS61:
     
  3. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Um, it's not a single statistic, it represents a huge facet of the offensive half of the game. It feeds into points per possession (or Offensive efficiency, if you will) which has a very strong correlation to win% and playoff success. Rebounding is also important. Turnovers are another. But those were discussed, as not changing much at all.
     
  4. Blazer Fanatic

    Blazer Fanatic Suspended

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    4,282
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Maybe. I guess LA isn't the MVP of even the Blazers now.

    See you on the Bulls forum Denny where I will trash Taj Gibson and every Bull with a single stat that is completely out of context and not at all representative of reality. Win/Win.
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2014
  5. Blazer Fanatic

    Blazer Fanatic Suspended

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    4,282
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    0

    This is a good point. It has been argued several times in this thread. It bears repeating. And Brain will ignore it.
     
  6. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    67,845
    Likes Received:
    66,602
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LaMarcus is having the best season I've seen him play since he became a Blazer. Now the thread asks a question...I'm not waiting, I'm on the L-Train and for those who aren't, you're missing one hell of a basketball season in Portland! LaMarcus had 3 steals tonight against the Mavs and his double double...30-12 came with sitting most of the 4th qtr. He's dominating. Check Dirks stats for the night or Duncan's for the night before...LaMarcus smoked them both. Deal with it!
     
  7. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    122,905
    Likes Received:
    122,902
    Trophy Points:
    115
    I think LMA goes to 11!

    [video=youtube;4xgx4k83zzc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xgx4k83zzc[/video]
     
  8. Strenuus

    Strenuus Global Moderator Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    50,072
    Likes Received:
    35,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    lmao. I finally actually watched that clip of "These go to eleven". That's fantastic.
     
  9. Blazer Fanatic

    Blazer Fanatic Suspended

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    4,282
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Stop bagging on LA! Everyone knows he goes to 12.4.
     
  10. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    67,845
    Likes Received:
    66,602
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I love Spinal Tap but my favorite part is the Stonehenge prop they used on stage.
     
  11. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's not a "single stat", it's a huge portion of the offense, and the only one of rebounding/turnovers/shooting that I didn't cover as a positive for LMA.

    Do you ever read stuff from the Association for Basketball Research? Basketball Journal? Or any of the Sloan Conference papers? There was a paper called "Basketball on Paper" that a scout who got his PhD wrote up that talked about statistical analysis of reams of historical data to find correlations among successful teams. (Historical, not predictive)

    I know you hate taking what I say seriously, but seriously, this is one of the reasons why I harp on eFG%, TO's and rebounding, written by a guy who was a player, scout, coach and, most importantly, not a dude on a message board.
     
  12. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    122,905
    Likes Received:
    122,902
    Trophy Points:
    115
    [​IMG]
     
  13. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    67,845
    Likes Received:
    66,602
    Trophy Points:
    113
    uh...Blazer Fanatic is not a dude
     
  14. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,372
    Likes Received:
    12,498
    Trophy Points:
    113
    pretty sure he's referring to himself
     
  15. BlazerCaravan

    BlazerCaravan Hug a Bigot... to Death

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    28,071
    Likes Received:
    10,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FTFY... Not that he doesn't know way more than us, but in a club of champions, he's an outsider, a Monday-morning quarterback. A highly qualified message board guy.
     
  16. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,372
    Likes Received:
    12,498
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He's someone analyzing what successful teams HAVE done. DO you have to win a title to do that?
     
  17. BlazerCaravan

    BlazerCaravan Hug a Bigot... to Death

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    28,071
    Likes Received:
    10,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No and that's why the message board guy thing is bogus. We have access to the same stats and some of us have way too much time on our hands.

    It's like someone insisting they know more than us because he coached girls basketball and we don't.
     
  18. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    Typically you need an MVP-level player to win a title. LMA is as close to an MVP-level player that the Blazers have had since Clyde Drexler.

    In terms of PER, LMA is right on par with Dirk Nowitzki surrounded by 3-point shooters this season during Dallas' championship season. The year Dallas lost to Miami, Dirk had a PER far above his norm.
     
  19. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    67,845
    Likes Received:
    66,602
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It was probably a guy with a PhD who read all the journals and papers and studied the stats from previous players that told Mugsy Bogues he was too short to play basketball.
     
  20. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,372
    Likes Received:
    12,498
    Trophy Points:
    113

    I agree. And if you look at the 4 criteria brian posted from the guy, we're top 10 in FG%, 4th in TOV%, 2nd in ORB% and we're 13th in FTA per FGA, slightly below league average, but in the top half of the league, which helps the successful team aspect. I just don't think you need to have won a title to be able to analyze past teams and see what they did well.
    I think brian's "not a dude on a message board" line was more saying hey, you don't have to just take it from me looking at stuff, referring to himself as the "some dude on a message board"
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page