Income inequality at an all-time high

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by Sug, Aug 14, 2009.

  1. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,380
    Likes Received:
    25,424
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    I'd say that would be a bad thing for Harry (and Sally) because the government would collapse.

    barfo
     
  2. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Nice try. Fail.
     
  3. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,058
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    NO!
    I WANT MORE TAXES!!! (serious)

    I would rather make only 30k a year than 40k a year after taxes, if that means someone else only gets 300k instead of 400k because of taxes.

    also, just responding to the thread: I'm pretty sure "all-time high" would be the middle ages or any time of monarchies... Unless you meant all time high in the us...
     
  4. bodyman5001

    bodyman5001 Genius

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,147
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    auto collision technician
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    I would be happy for both of them. The problem is that the government spends more money than it would take in if Harry brought home 10 grand a year and Sally took home 50 grand a year. Even if their gross figures were what you started with.

    I would rather we decide as a nation what crap we are going to pay for and then figure out how to tax everyone equally to make it happen. If the poorer of us figured out that we couldn't pay our rent AND Directv bill then a large corporation might get less of our income.

    If the large corporations figure out a way to get us suckers to buy their stuff, that is our problem. Nobody forces unemployed or people who live under the poverty line to get a damn cell phone. We give the money to them because we want to.

    Maybe that is our problem too, we spend our disposable income (if we have it) on something that will NEVER pay us back. That money is gone.

    The thing is, many of us have been happy to ride along and get the newest gadgets to make our current lives fun. We didn't care if we don't save for our retirement. Now people are finding that they won't get to work full time up until that point and the shit is hitting the fan.

    I go on car websites a TON and it never ends with people who have to sell all their stuff because they are out of work for two months. Maybe they shouldn't have bought an extra 10 thousand dollar car as a play toy if they don't have a nest egg????????

    PS...then they get pissed that they can't sell it for what they paid for it because everyone else is in the same boat!
     

Share This Page