I agree but it has to be dealt with legally. Not independent muting. Slander is illegal. So is liable. But we are still free to commit those acts and then be punish for them. What im talking about is limiting the ability to do so in the first place creates a real deep state of mystery, deception and corruption of the likes that would make our current system seem like heaven.
And he committed the acts and was punished for it. He had the free will to incite violence and use hateful speech. Then twitter, Facebook, etc had the free will to lock his ass out.
He’s been on Twitter for years saying whatever he wants. They let him stay WAY too long. He finally went too far. You know, encouraging and inciting violence and getting people killed.
and ill add because ive alwyas had very few friends who are blazers fans or sports fans in general. And honestly your doubling down on being an ass to me from the moment i got here has made that very hard. You my reactions might not be the best but you made a point to just push the button over and over for a long time, when you could have just accepted that maybe our sense of humor differs instead of giving me a hard time because i didnt get yours. But with that said im a glutton for punishment i suppose because im a blazer fanatic and this is the only place to go to talk hoops. I just need to have more discipline to only talk hoops though because this just doesn't work. I really believe, not all bit more than enough posters here are wayyy too judgmental and basically just try to find a fault in the next poster. but like i told you from the get go when you pounded your chest and told me i better watch it because your a “big deal around here”... im not going anywhere and ill continue to fight the good fight.
This thread is about January 6th. You know, when an insurrection against our democracy happened. It's not about you, so please take your opinions of yourself elsewhere. Nobody cares.
dont think i dont get it or the reasoning behind it. Im just trying to follow the precedent thru to the end game. Show me a place where censorship has succeeded? Rhetoric is absolutely powerful ,but my opinion based on my limited knowledge of history, is that when violence is used in more than anything than self defense, it only helps to solidify the foundation of and gather support for the opposition. Even if they are wrong. look at terrorism. Its a 99.9% failure rate. Not only do they fail at abolishing thier enemy but it often makes it stronger. So when we use violence to curtail words, what evidence do we have that it has ever succeeded before? do i have an answer to end rascism? No. Do i think violence will stop it? No. Why? History has proven it hasnt. It just cycles round and round.
really? Report the post them. I was responding to someone who asked questions. Like all other threads stay on topic? Lmfao, geez man. There is an ignore button. All this place is is about our own opinions on things, wtf are you talking about?
oh and this post was on topic? Or just continuing what you dont want to read but will just blame me for it continuing? If you were seerious you would have ed me and ask me to get back on topic instead of post it here keeping things off topic. I mean really? hahahaha
you know what the more i think about it, thanks for proving you are another hcp following bias person. Why didn't you tell him to stop asking me to explain myself? He asked me the question that had nothing to do with this thread but instead of asking HIM to keep it on topic, you come at me... and this is why i say some members here are hypocrites to the max.... there you have it in a nutshell. Hcp asks me something nothing to do with the topic. I respond. No one tells him to get on topic but, instead come at me.. Your fucking blind if you don't see how fucked that is.. and how it keeps me going on and on around here.... simply unreal...
Yes. Yes, it does. @jlprk is our Bullshit Hubbard. @barfo is our Chodey Pomeray. @riverman is most definitely our Japhy Ryder - couldn't think of a pun. That's high respect, by the way.
