I'll summarize your response to my summary. You're saying After Whitsitt, the Oregonian wanted Patterson & Nash to succeed, so the paper falsely claimed that Allen was the one behind paying Miles too much. In the Knicks trade, Allen didn't make management replace Miles with Webster, because Blazer presidents and GMs say that Allen almost always lets them make such decisions. And Pritchard says that Allen didn't nix that particular trade. Thanks. Any other inaccuracies in the Miles history? I'd like to straighten out the kinks.
