Zombie Judge dismisses lawsuit by former Trail Blazers GM Bob Whitsitt

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

SlyPokerDog

Woof!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
126,485
Likes
146,950
Points
115
A lawsuit filed by two sports industry executives who claimed they were owed a $2 million finders fee after the Philadelphia 76ers were sold three years ago, was thrown out by a federal judge earlier this week.

Bob Whitsitt, the former president of the Seattle Seahawks and the Portland Trailblazers, and Thomas Shine, a former executive with Reebok International Ltd., filed a lawsuit in late 2011 in which they claimed they introduced investor Jason Levien to Comcast-Spectacor chairman Edward Snider at a lunch meeting in 2010.

Levien, a one-time NBA player agent and former assistant general manager with the Sacramento Kings, was part of the large group of investors that group bought the Sixers from Comcast-Spectacor for $280 million in 2011. The group was led by New York-based leveraged buyout specialist and Apollo Group Management co-founder Joshua Harris.

Philadelphia sports and entertainment company Comcast-Spectacor, which owns the Philadelphia Flyers, argued it only agreed to pay a finders fee if the duo identified a new controlling owner for the Sixers.

According to court documents, controlling owner was defined as someone who “owns at least 15 percent of the equity interest in the franchise and has exclusive authority to manage the operations of the franchise.”

Comcast-Spectacor, a division of Comcast Corp. (NASDAQ: CMSCA), said it paid a finders fee related to the sale of the Sixers to another entity.

Levien, according to court records, attempted to put together a group to buy the Sixers, but he later joined the group led by Harris.

Harris is the controlling owner of the Sixers. According to court documents, David Blitzer, senior managing director of the investment banking firm The Blackstone Group, and Harris each own 39.13 percent of the Sixers, while Levien Sports LP, led by Levien, owns 8.7 percent.

U.S. District Judge Petrese Tucker in Philadelphia dismissed the lawsuit saying Whitsitt and Shine failed to meet the requirements for the finders fee, which was to identify a controlling owner.

http://www.bizjournals.com/philadel...es-lawsuit-by-duo-seeking-2m-finders-fee.html
 
3 years ago when Whitsitt sued, it was on this board. I said that even if Levien is now a minority owner, if he owns 15%, Bob might win. Now we're told he owns 8.7%. I bet that one reason Whitsitt sued was to discover the owner percentages.

I think I also posted that it wasn't clear whether the contract required Levien to just lead a competing group in which he's controlling owner. That he was, but later after reformulation of groups, the new winning group consisted of the strongest member from each initial group.
 
If I were the Knicks, Nets or Lakers I would have hired Whitsitt as GM. When given unlimited money that guy can turn a roster.
 
Soon after the Seahawks gig he got colon cancer, I think it was. He was quiet for awhile and stopped running in the rat race. Since then he's operated as if he's retired. Now he's too old for a comeback.
 
Whitsitt is/was a grifter. He's great at spending the money of other people. Paul Allen had to learn that lesson two times. Once resulted in the Jail Blazer era and bankruptcy for the Rose Garden. The other resulted in an old and over-paid NFL roster that wasn't fixed until Mike Holmgren had to fire him.

Has Whitsitt had an executive pro sports position since Allen fired him for the second time?

Oh wow. This is just sad...

http://www.whitsittenterprises.com/whitsitt_profile.htm

banner.jpg
 
I'm not sure. Maybe I'll email Whitsitt's LLC and ask him.

If I were GM, I'd want to spend my owner's money, not my own.

Unless I was also the owner. Then I'd spend my own.
 
If I were GM, I'd want to spend my owner's money, not my own.

Unless I was also the owner. Then I'd spend my own.

Well, if you want to have A LOT of your money spent with little to show for it, you should hire Whitsitt.
 
Well, if you want to have A LOT of your money spent with little to show for it, you should hire Whitsitt.

Well, I'd say he was boom or bust, really. The Blazers got a lot of value for a lot of money spent for a while. And then they got very little for a lot of money spent. And then he was fired.
 
Well, I'd say he was boom or bust, really. The Blazers got a lot of value for a lot of money spent for a while. And then they got very little for a lot of money spent. And then he was fired.

The 2000 WCFs weren't with the 9 years of horrific play that followed, IMO. The '99 WCF were in the shortened-season, and that team was not very good.
 
The 2000 WCFs weren't with the 9 years of horrific play that followed, IMO. The '99 WCF were in the shortened-season, and that team was not very good.

We went 35-15 (.700). In the 3rd round (Western Finals) we lost 4-0 to the Spurs. In the next round (NBA Finals) the Spurs won the championship 4-1, demoralizing fans like you.

In 2014, the Spurs again had it super-together. They beat us 4-1 in the 2nd round and went on to be champs, 4-1, demoralizing LeBron into leaving.

The '99 Blazers were far better than the current team, which we seem to think is so good. Bring back Bob!
 
We went 35-15 (.700). In the 3rd round (Western Finals) we lost 4-0 to the Spurs. In the next round (NBA Finals) the Spurs won the championship 4-1, demoralizing fans like you.

In 2014, the Spurs again had it super-together. They beat us 4-1 in the 2nd round and went on to be champs, 4-1, demoralizing LeBron into leaving.

The '99 Blazers were far better than the current team, which we seem to think is so good. Bring back Bob!

I'm a Trader Bob fan, always have been. I think what he really needed was not to be dismissed but to be given a new direction and framework to live by by the owner. To be made to do business the way his last 6 gms were made to do business. With fiscal responsibility, eye on character and chemistry and with the eye on the community. He would have been successful under any circumstance. IMO, There hasn't been another gm that has walked through this organization that could do what he did. The way he could broker and structure deals was unbelieveable. And he could recruit.

I would take him back.
 
There hasn't been another gm that has walked through this organization that could do what he did.

I agree. I don't think any other GM has spent so much money for also-ran status. Also-ran status that directly led to financial distress that ended up with Oregon Arena Corporation declaring bankruptcy for control of the Rose Garden, while also on the side alienating Rip City by signing drug addicts like Shawn Kemp, sex offenders such as Ruben Patterson, and dog fighters like Qynetel Woods.

I'm shocked no NBA team has hired him since the Jail Blazers!
 
Last edited:
I agree. I don't think any other GM has spent so much money for also-ran status. Also-ran status that directly led to financial distress that ended up with Oregon Arena Corporation declaring bankruptcy for control of the Rose Garden, while also on the side alienating Rip City by signing drug addicts like Shawn Kemp, sex offenders such as Ruben Patterson, and dog fighters like Qynetel Woods.

I'm shocked no NBA team has hired him since the Jail Blazers!

All he needed was to be told to think differently and to be vetoed everyonce in awhile like the last 6 GMs. The last 6 GMs ain't close in their skill sets.

Don't think Paul doesn't take ownership for some of that. He does.
 
No joke. Just had $2K+ on my cell thru a Home Depot jacked. One other social media site jacked. Took me 2 hours to get my phone back.

Apologies, brother.
I'd need the Cliff notes on this post myself to understand. You got hacked through your cell from a Home Depot account? Doesn't your dad work there? Sorry you got hacked..that sucks.
 
Back
Top