There should be no marriage recognized by the government. It should be a private affair between whoevz and hold no legal significance.
Then you believe in gun control. You liberal tree hugging bastard! :MARIS61: Felons can vote. Just not when they are in prison or out on parole.
Who said I was against gun control? I've made it clear in the control threads that I am fine with registration. What I'm against is being able to buy rocket launchers and tanks. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony_disenfranchisement You cannot vote in the state of California if you've ever been a convicted felon
Mags, you can vote. Who told you you can't? You are not allowed to vote if you have a felony conviction and you are still in state prison or serving a sentence in jail under Realignment, are awaiting transfer to a state prison, or if you are on parole, on post-release community supervision, or on mandatory supervision. Once you have completed your prison sentence and parole or other community supervision, you can register to vote. https://www.aclu.org/know-your-voting-rights-california-text-only#Felony
You may not be able to buy one but you can MacGyver one up out of some drano, a used bathroom trash can and about a 1000 rubber bands.
Yes, you can legally own a grenade launcher! http://xdind.com/yes-you-can-legally-own-a-grenade-launcher/
Fuck California, you need a Mags family compound in southern Oregon. Keep your RPGs there and boogie up when shit starts crackin'!
After a week in jail, The Unimpeachable Molly Brown will be a martyr to the county voters and hold her job in perpetuity.
She must be really cold being completely naked in jail. "Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material." -Leviticus 19:19
In 1975 a county clerk in Colorado issued a same-sex marriage license, finding no law that forbade it. When a man came to her office to marry his horse in protest, she determined the 8-year-old horse was too young to get married without parental consent and refused the license.
Sorry, not trying to quote anyone, having trouble when I try to enter. It won't let me type!!! Anyway - to get back to the subject at hand. The difference between her actions and civil disobedience is that civil disobedients did not get a high paying job and then refuse to do it while demanding to still be paid. They carried out nonviolent actions against unjust laws. She is carrying out action to restore unjust laws. They expected to and asked to be arrested and jailed. She expected to be able to get away with breaking the law; her defenders, which includes most of the Republican presidential field, demand she be released from jail and receive no punishment for breaking the law. Civil disobedients never demanded anyone else break the law in protest, it was a personal decision of conscience and those who were unable or unwilling to face jail time supported the civil disobedients with nonviolent, legal protest actions like rallies. She is demanding her subordinates break the law even if they are ready to comply. She never demanded hetero couples seeking marriage licenses prove their godliness; they may have been baby rapers or cocaine dealers or murderers or anydamnthing else, they were heterosexual, that made their marraiges godly. But she insists no gay person can be godly enough for her. That is bigotry. She is not Martin Luther King. She is George Wallace blocking the schoohouse door to keep Black children out. She is a retrograde bigot who considers gay people inferior to her by definition, demanding the law comply with her twisted view of Christianity. She will, sadly, make shitloads of money from it. She belongs in the dustbin of history.
