<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (iversonfan268 @ Oct 30 2006, 12:01 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Oh please just shutup and quit trying to make it look like you meant Rick Barry. They are two totally different players who played for two totally differet teams. Do you think were all idiots here. Also I laugh at how much you know about your own team. Danny Granger will play 40 mpg this season? Don't make me laugh. Who else wuld he share minutes with? Well lets see they did just aquire a guy named Al Harrington who also happens to play both the SF and PF positions but he won't be playing at all huh? Of course there is also Josh Powell and Shawne Williams to add tot hat list. Wait to just make yourself look like even more of a dumbass. Plus you said he will double his minutes which is 44 mpg not 40. Wait to screw up the match again smart one. So Tayshaun Prince doesn't normally do well when he plays you guys? Oh yeah actually watch the Pistons please. You have no idea what you are talking about. Tayshaun only gets points off of open dunks? I'm osrry but to average 14 ppg your going to have to score in more ways than getting open dunks. He's a solid shooter and shoots a career 38% from 3 pt range. He also can create for himself and take it to the hoop. Once again watch basketball for once. Oh yeah btw if Granger averages 2 spg and 2 bpg I will send you $500 dollars in the mail.</div>pacers frontcourtc - onealpf - harringtonsf - grangerJosh Powell will be lucky to play 10 minutes at any posistionShawne Williams will likely spend most of his time in the d-league40 minutes is the worst he would play so I went by it <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Fouled Out @ Oct 30 2006, 12:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>...Tayshaun can't score? That's ridiculous, he's not putting up eye-popping scoring numbers, but he's also an option behind Sheed, Rip, and Chauncey...Hell, he was drafted partly due to his shooting ability and clutchness...Dude dropped 41 in one game in his last year at Kentucky...</div>41 in college means nothing at allprobably some of the d-league players have dropped 40 in a game in college
Good god, This is the worst argument I have ever seen.I would LOVE tor rip every single one of Pacer Fan's posts to shreds, but it looks like Lakaboy has done the honors.Give it up, dude.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>rok only has 3530 posts that I've read</div> I doubt you read every single post I've made on this board.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pacers fan forever @ Oct 30 2006, 06:31 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>pacers frontcourtc - onealpf - harringtonsf - grangerJosh Powell will be lucky to play 10 minutes at any posistionShawne Williams will likely spend most of his time in the d-league40 minutes is the worst he would play so I went by it 41 in college means nothing at allprobably some of the d-league players have dropped 40 in a game in college</div>I'm sorry but to say 41 points means nothing at all is incredibly stupid and shows you don't even know what you are saying. You said Tayshaun doesn't have an offensive game and can't score. Regardless if it was college or not 41 points in a game is still great offnsively.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Rok @ Oct 30 2006, 10:18 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I doubt you read every single post I've made on this board.</div>probably not<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (iversonfan268 @ Oct 30 2006, 10:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm sorry but to say 41 points means nothing at all is incredibly stupid and shows you don't even know what you are saying. You said Tayshaun doesn't have an offensive game and can't score. Regardless if it was college or not 41 points in a game is still great offnsively.</div>well, this is an nba forum, not a college forum, so therefore I wont :worthy: what a player did in college<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BALLAHOLLIC @ Oct 30 2006, 10:11 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Good god, This is the worst argument I have ever seen.I would LOVE tor rip every single one of Pacer Fan's posts to shreds, but it looks like Lakaboy has done the honors.Give it up, dude.</div>if it's such a worthless argument - why do people keep coming back?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>well, this is an nba forum, not a college forum, so therefore I wont :worthy: what a player did in college</div> This is a basketball forum. Hence the name of Basketball World. It deals with all basketball from college, high school, pro, Euroleague, D-League, WNBA.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pacers fan forever @ Oct 29 2006, 11:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>if you read I said granger has a year under his belt, better conditioning, and higher bball iqwhy wouldn't granger play 40 minutes?who else we got there? rawle marshall - give me a break (see I can't even spell his name right)who said everyone is getting doubleteamed? the person with the ball is getting doubleteamedI would reply to the rest but there were too many big words (I mean little) that yo no comprende)btw - I'm the top math student in by grade - and no bs about my school please</div>Oh, okay, I get it. He has better conditioning this year, so he'll go from .7 and .8 spg and bpg to 2.0 and 2.0, right? Oh, give me a break. Yeah, looks like you dont know the Pacers as well as you think you do? Only Rawle Marshall playing SF other than Granger? Al Harrington will spend time at SF, and Josh Powell and Shawne Williams both play SF as well. Granger won't gert more than 34 mpg. If he gets 44 mpg like you see he will, I'll cut off my dick.Oh, okay, so when the Pistons swing the ball around the defenders will run to the open man before he shoots it or takes it in, right? Please, that's not how it works. Int he post players like Shaq get double teamed, but jesus christ man, it's facking impossible for Sheed, Rip, and Chauncey to all get double teamed. That makes no sense. When one of them is double teamed, they would just find the open man anyway. That's what I meant in the first place.Oh, and I'm assuming that math thing isnt complete bs
Pacerfan- When exactly did Indiana 'shut' down Kobe and hold him to 15 points?I recall him getting 26 points in a loss. and 45 points in a win.Dont go making stuff up.
I'm just kidding about Prince. I'm just representing the Pistons.Tayshaun Prince is much better than Granger at about all aspects of the game.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pacers fan forever @ Oct 30 2006, 08:37 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>probably notwell, this is an nba forum, not a college forum, so therefore I wont :worthy: what a player did in collegeif it's such a worthless argument - why do people keep coming back? </div>Like Rok already pointed out this is a basketball forum for any basketball. Also that post said nothing other than I was right and you didn't have anything else good to sya to back up your arguement.People keep coming back because it's almost impossible to hold back from proving every incredibly stupid post you've made wrong. Also if we don't you'll never get an actual decent amount of knowledge towards the game.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (iversonfan268 @ Oct 30 2006, 08:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Like Rok already pointed out this is a basketball forum for any basketball. Also that post said nothing other than I was right and you didn't have anything else good to sya to back up your arguement.People keep coming back because it's almost impossible to hold back from proving every incredibly stupid post you've made wrong. Also if we don't you'll never get an actual decent amount of knowledge towards the game.</div>do you remember the name of this thread? lakers vs pacersI say pacers and all the kobe lovers come after me, it has nothing to do with my stupidity.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pacers fan forever @ Oct 30 2006, 05:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>do you remember the name of this thread? lakers vs pacersI say pacers and all the kobe lovers come after me, it has nothing to do with my stupidity.</div>Kobe's one of the most hated players on this site. There's only been a couple of Lakers fans who have come back at you to defend their team, the others joined in because of the stupidity you're showing in this thread, as Iversonfan said it's tempting when somebody says something ludicrous to prove them wrong.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Lakaboy42 @ Oct 30 2006, 09:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Kobe's one of the most hated players on this site. There's only been a couple of Lakers fans who have come back at you to defend their team, the others joined in because of the stupidity you're showing in this thread, as Iversonfan said it's tempting when somebody says something ludicrous to prove them wrong.</div>what does ludicrous mean?
Shows your stupidity again. You're 14. I would think someone like your caliber of "nba knowledge" should know...It means something laughable due to your ridiculous comebacks, "knowledge" and sh*t like that.Y'Feel meh?
I'd take L.A. in a heartbeat. We all know Danny Granger is a solid defender, but I think Lamar could penetrate on him and dish out to Kobe. The reason L.A. would win...I mean...In general, Kobe is just that good.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (dsounG @ Oct 30 2006, 10:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Shows your stupidity again. You're 14. I would think someone like your caliber of "nba knowledge" should know...It means something laughable due to your ridiculous comebacks, "knowledge" and sh*t like that.Y'Feel meh?</div>not reallyI asked what it means so I don't post a stupid comment<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BottomOfDaMapTX @ Oct 31 2006, 09:00 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'd take L.A. in a heartbeat. We all know Danny Granger is a solid defender, but I think Lamar could penetrate on him and dish out to Kobe. The reason L.A. would win...I mean...In general, Kobe is just that good.</div>your heartbeat is off
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ReppinTheD @ Oct 31 2006, 06:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Bottom line is Kobe > Pacerswhich in turn means Lakers > Pacers. Case Closed.</div>you have absoltely no reasoningif kobe cn take over games, and win every single won? how come he hasn't won a ring yet without shaq? shaq has won a ring without kobe.
It's only been two seasons, and Kobe doesn't have a Dwayne Wade carrying the team...Shaq didn't win the Chip for the Heat last year, it was Dwade. Bad reasoning on your part.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ReppinTheD @ Oct 31 2006, 10:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>It's only been two seasons, and Kobe doesn't have a Dwayne Wade carrying the team...Shaq didn't win the Chip for the Heat last year, it was Dwade. Bad reasoning on your part.</div>I'm not taking anything away from d-wade - he was awesome - but shaq can affect a game in so many ways. Many times just by having him down low the defense has to tighten up on shaq and his teamates have easy shots.
