Lesbian couple refused wedding cake files state discrimination complaint

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by tlongII, Aug 14, 2013.

  1. The_Lillard_King

    The_Lillard_King Westside

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,405
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I didn't get your cake response. I say let them eat cake (a Marie Antoinette reference) and you said you are pretty sure they do and that is why he have this situation. But isn't it the opposite, they did not them them eat cake and that is why we have this situation. Had they just served them with them with the cake, none of this would happened.

    Anyways, I going to get some lunch . . . and some cake.
     
  2. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    cake is pussy. (should be pie).
     
  3. BLAZINGGIANTS

    BLAZINGGIANTS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    22,030
    Likes Received:
    14,606
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I knew El-P would at least get it.
     
  4. DaLincolnJones

    DaLincolnJones Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2011
    Messages:
    8,319
    Likes Received:
    1,886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your rights to Freedom of Religion and the free exercise thereof means:
    •The Freedom of Religion is an inalienable right.
    •The First Amendment provides for the Freedom of Religion for all Americans.
    •The Free Exercise Clause provides that government will neither control nor prohibit the free exercise of one’s religion.
    •The government will remain neutral
     
  5. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    22,825
    Likes Received:
    29,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No one is being forced to change their religious views. They are being "forced" to follow secular law. Like every citizen and resident of these United States. A bakery is not a church. The couple is being neither petty nor stupid. Any more than I was being petty and stupid when I said the place where I worked needed to follow the law.
     
  6. DaLincolnJones

    DaLincolnJones Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2011
    Messages:
    8,319
    Likes Received:
    1,886
    Trophy Points:
    113

    so...the only rights that count are the rights tthat you agree with?

    I dont follow an orgonized religion, so by your statement here, would I have no rights?

    funny, I thought we all still had First Amendment rights
     
  7. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,058
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    And if a Muslim business wanted to refuse a jewish couple?
     
  8. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    As ugly as their actions are, the bakery is private property, and the owners really should be able to refuse to serve who they choose. The recourse is to patronize the bakery up the street who wants the business.

    What are you going to do, send in the SWAT team to force the people to make the cake?
     
  9. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,058
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    What is your feeling about companies that sue for slander when someone writes a negative review?
     
  10. DaLincolnJones

    DaLincolnJones Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2011
    Messages:
    8,319
    Likes Received:
    1,886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    lol, well, I am sure you would be ok with that...
     
  11. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    22,825
    Likes Received:
    29,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Where did that come from? Of course, they can believe what they want. Even if it's stupid. And I follow no religion either, what has that to do with anything I said? However, any business is subject to secular law. Period. No exceptions. They can no more violate non discrimination laws than they can legally violate minimum wage, or health laws, or any other law. They do have First Amendment rights to talk publicly about how much they hate gay people. Or hate minimum wage. Or hate the fact that they can't have cockroaches and rats in their kitchen. Or anything else. Most business owners don't find that a good idea, but they have the right to say that stuff. They still have to follow the law. No exceptions.

    The bakery may be private property but again, business follow laws or faces consequences. Just like individuals. It may be private property but this couple's taxes pay for their police and fire protection, pays for the health inspectors that certify the food is safe to eat, pays for the roads employees and customers use to get there, pays for the schools employees attend to learn basic skills and community colleges where people learn to bake. No need to send in a SWAT team. There are other ways to enforce the law, like what this couple did. Because otherwise you are sayiing straight couples have access to 100% of businesses (if they can pay, of course) but gay couples only have access to (100%-bigot) businesses.
     
  12. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    The truth is the best defense.
     
  13. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    You already said that. The bakery pays plenty of tax to pay to be inspected and otherwise interfered with.

    You didn't answer my question. Are you going to send in the SWAT team to force these people to bake a cake? They simply refuse. You going to close down their business? That seems worse than refusing to bake the cake.

    Property rights are one of the great things about this nation. They come with far more good than bad, but you have to deal with the bad.
     
  14. BlazerWookee

    BlazerWookee UNTILT THE DAMN PINWHEEL!

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    13,196
    Likes Received:
    6,535
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Gear Finisher
    Location:
    Lebanon, Oregon
    The baker is an asshole for refusing to make the cake, but it's his right to be an asshole. The couple are assholes for dragging this into the courts, but it's their right to be assholes.

    My advice to the couple would be to find a baker who wants their business. My advice to the baker would be to STFU and make the damned cake.

    If this makes it to a court date, I hope the baker countersues for violation of the Free Exercise Clause...
     
    maxiep and Eastoff like this.
  15. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    I agree.

    That said, Christian or not, it is shallow and wrong. They should have provided the cake.
     
  16. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,058
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    I think this sums it up well.
     
  17. The_Lillard_King

    The_Lillard_King Westside

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,405
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You don't send a SWAT team, you hit them where it hurts which is in the pocketbook. Gov't can fine them (if warranted) and Jane Public can sue them for money. If Jane wins, I'm guessing the business will change their practices accordingly and they will bake the cake next time (without the use of SWAT)

    Seems pretty obvious since that is what is happening here.
     
  18. VanillaGorilla

    VanillaGorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,073
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Seriously.

    Fuck the baker.

    Fuck the lesbian couple.

    They're both stupid.

    It should 100% be the bakers right not to make a cake for anyone for any reason.
     
  19. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    Agreed.
     
  20. The_Lillard_King

    The_Lillard_King Westside

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,405
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    So they can refuse to sell to Black people . . . or only offer week old cakes to Black people.
     

Share This Page