Don't be jealous of my good genes. LOL. At age 40, I have an 8 pack that you can see from space. I can run and sprint for hours. I can still run the 100 in 11 flat. Even though diabetes and heart problems run in my family, I have no health concerns. My testosterone levels are great. I can have hour long sex with no impotence. It's funny how this guy thinks his genes are superior: You should be ashamed of yourself with this post. It makes absolutely no sense and flies in the face of reality. Germany right now shut down 8 of their nuclear plants and plan on shutting all of their nuclear plants down by 2025. So WTF are you talking about? You're comparing the way we would use energy in 10-15 years from now the way we used it before we had electricity? That's just dumb it makes no sense.
See, it's this type of dismissive and exclusionary language that stifles true discourse. There is a significant difference between resistance and intolerance, not just a semantic once. Similarly, there's a large difference between resistance to some change, and resistance to all change. Also, there are times when progress needs to be impeded; unbound wholesale change--even of a basically positive nature--can often be so disruptive that it does more harm than good. Taking someone's words and twisting them, even if ever so slightly, to fit your own narrative is not only bad discussion protocol, but it's also a bit rude. I think you're better than that.
Well said. It's hard for me to accept "change" and "progress" when I'm being screamed at, labeled, and openly insulted by the very people who claim to want those two things. Find a different way to get your point across. Try relating to me about something. Try finding something that we share in common. Try speaking my lingo. Try getting to know me. Otherwise, you deserve Donald Trump as your president.
It's everywhere. Animals do it we do it. We are born this way if you're not gay then you can't really speak on it. Maybe you should have more intimate conversations with people. When did you wake up and know that you were heterosexual? You you always were. You didn't suddenly become hetero. You were born that way. 1 John 4:8 He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love. So that would indicate that if you do love then you do know God... So again, who created the love between the gay people if God is love?
You realize that I already both explained the difference between what that verse actually says and what you're claiming it says, and answered that question, right?
Goat wanders into Portland-area 7-Eleven, munches on Skittles http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2017/01/goat_wanders_into_portland_7-e.html
That's the kind of spiritual misinterpretation that gets people in trouble. Your inference--that saying that those who don't love don't know God implies that everyone who does love does know God would be the same logic as claiming that saying, "If you don't love basketball, then you don't love the Lakers" equates to saying, "If you love basketball, then you love the Lakers." Just as it is possible for me to love basketball and not love the Lakers, it is possible for a human to love another human but still not know God. And as I said before, the reason for that is all humans are made in God's image. This doesn't mean that God physically looks like a human, but that we are made with mental, emotional, and spiritual characteristics reflective of God's nature. These characteristics are what differentiate us from animals, and why all humans have the capacity to love in a manner similar to how God loves, even without knowing him.
I guess we'll agree to disagree on your analogy. I don't believe it's a good one. I personally don't subscribe to that man-made book anyway. It was written by fallible men are used to Stone their women if they were raped...
Ok, how about this one. All alt-right's are conservatives, yes? So then it's fair to say, "if you're not a conservative, you're not alt-right." Does that then mean that if you are conservative, then you are alt-right? If you also don't believe that to be a good analogy, would you care to explain why?
So it's meant as a joke. Okay. I shudder to think, however, about how many people will take it seriously.
I have done my research. Energy works as energy works. The same laws of physics applied then and now. Coal, not nuclear. Though nuclear is clean and coal is not. http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=26372 Germany’s renewables electricity generation grows in 2015, but coal still dominant
But you act like we wouldn't have light that wouldn't be created by a flame at night. I'm sorry but in 2025 we're not going to be using fucking lanterns. You're not making sense. Just because Cole is still dominant just means that those assholes still have their fingers in creating pollution from fossil fuels. As long as these corporations continue to have us by the balls, yes coal and oil will still be relevant. But if for you think for 1 second that we couldn't be completely solar and not move toward that direction I call bullshit.
They're burning coal at night and when the wind isn't blowing. Rely on green energy, and you will need candles and a gas generator to keep the fridge cold. Like I said, the physics is impossible to ignore. Or do so to all our detriment.
If God is love what exists between the two gay people? Love created by God. If God makes no mistakes why are gay people born that way? These analogies don't really matter. What matters is people who concentrate on gay sex more than love. That's my whole point.
