Actually, aren't we at the same sample size as last year? I'm patient, but holy hell this year he's been bad for the majority of the year. And stats don't tell the story of the eye test, my friend.
Why did we let this dude back in after he got banned? MFer lied in his first post... "I'm moving to Portland from Germany... and it so happens that's where my favorite team plays!!!" Nurk hasn't been good but he's not a finished product idiot. He's 23. The way you post sounds like an immature 14-year old.
I still thank Denver. We got Nurk, down or not right now, plus another first rounder, which allowed us to get Collins.
I'm not so sure I agree. Yes, he'll be fine, but as for the foundation????? IMHO, a big mans foundatiin is his footwork, and Nurk's is awful on both ends of the floor. He has incredible insicts, but his footwork is not good
this is what happens when you dont appreciate him enough now he doesnt give a fuck either and I respect that
That's a dumb excuse. He needs to put in some work on his game. He can be a lot better than he is. Don't respect pouting. Simply put: play better, play smarter.
You think someone like Damian would stop trying and caring if he felt under appreciated? No. He would step up. He has heart, and I'm sure Nurk does as well. If he had your attitude, he wouldn't even be in the league.
How the fuck could anybody who follows this team be called a "bandwagoner?" What "bandwagon" are people getting on? "Long-suffering," afflicted with "Stockholm Syndrome," "Delusional," "Masochistic," like "Charlie Brown and the football." These are all words, phrases and terms you could use to describe the people in this fanbase, but "bandwagoner" ain't one of 'em.
I could describe it one sentence for ya. If you only support players when they’re playing well, you are a bandwagoner.
