Lillard Time vs NLT

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by TBpup, Apr 3, 2016.

  1. blue9

    blue9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    10,729
    Likes Received:
    7,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Now that's a funny typo [or spelling error]!
     
    Orion Bailey and TBpup like this.
  2. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,713
    Likes Received:
    56,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    Freudian slip?

    :MARIS61:
     
    Orion Bailey, TBpup and blue9 like this.
  3. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,701
    Likes Received:
    24,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here's a cool stat, it's not totally related but it kind of is.

    Since February, CJ has been shooting the 3 ball at around a 46-47% clip. Prior to that, he shot 35% in Jan, 42% in Dec and 38% in Nov. 40% is good don't get me wrong, but the difference between 40% and 47% at the volume CJ shoots is the difference between a plain good shooter like Wesley Matthews and an elite shooter like JJ Redick or Kyle Korver.

    So I went on the NBA stats site (awesome site by the way) and I got this:

    upload_2016-4-6_17-13-40.png

    Check out the % of threes that CJ was assisted on in Oct-January versus the % assisted on in Feb-March (April is a small sample size buffed by his 6/6 game against Miami). The correlation seems pretty telling. Two hypothesis:

    1.) CJ is working off the ball more and Lillard/the team is looking to get CJ open more.
    2.) CJ has improved his shot selection by not taking as many off the dribble threes.

    Now here's Dame's:

    upload_2016-4-6_17-19-13.png

    Nearly half of his 3s are unassisted. We all know Dame loves taking threes off the bounce. It's also no secret that unassisted 3s are less accurate than assisted 3s. Even in CJ's worse months, a majority of his 3s were still assisted.

    I think what I'm trying to get at is this: Dame is a better shooter than his percentages indicate. The difference is probably not as big as the 37% - 42% difference between Dame and CJ's 3PT%, but he needs to pick his spots better. He really should improve his shot selection, at least a little bit.....as good as he is, he's not a Steph Curry like shooter.

    EDIT: Just for kicks, here's Steph:
    upload_2016-4-6_17-36-3.png
    Even Steph's unassisted 3pt% is less than Dame's. A lot of that has to due with having a great playmaker like Green, but the point stands.
     
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2016
    Tunchi likes this.
  4. Tunchi

    Tunchi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2015
    Messages:
    2,878
    Likes Received:
    1,003
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yup exactly my point. The eye test definitely supports this as well. Dame is just weird as hell with his shot selections. That what he needs to work on that's why Cj is much more consistent than dame
     

Share This Page