Lillard wants major trade this summer

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Bingo Bango, Mar 10, 2023.

  1. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,953
    Likes Received:
    145,218
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Players like Isiah Rider, Bonzi, Ruben Patterson, those are the types of players who didn't care about the franchise.

    Lillard obviously cares about the franchise, the community, the city, and the state.

    When was the last time a Blazer star moved his entire family here including his parents? Didn't catch the first flight out of Portland the moment the season was over? Invested and was hands-on in running businesses locally? Donated thousands of hours to local schools and organizations like Special Olympics?

    He's put his money, his time, and his effort where his heart is and that's Portland.
     
    Kano John, RR7, BoBoBREWSKI and 11 others like this.
  2. THE HCP

    THE HCP NorthEastPortland'sFinest

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    71,269
    Likes Received:
    59,933
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    N.E.P.
    Oh I thought Dame wanted a “MAJOR TRADE”. You’re talking about “fetching talent”?
     
  3. Strenuus

    Strenuus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    50,468
    Likes Received:
    35,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, you definitely wouldn't care if they sucked for years after saying youre done with them sucking for years.
     
    RR7 likes this.
  4. Strenuus

    Strenuus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    50,468
    Likes Received:
    35,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's why I laugh at everyone who's never satisfied.
     
    RR7, Phatguysrule and BlazerWookee like this.
  5. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    68,298
    Likes Received:
    67,316
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ?? I think it was pretty clear that talent can be acquired with $$ and Dame's leadership alone but you have to move a good player to get a good player..an impact player. Don't think the Suns ever thought KD, Kyrie and Harden would all bail on the Nets in the biggest market in the league but...hey...shit happens. Money talks and you know the rest. If the Bucks fail, Giannis loves Dame...just sayin'
     
  6. Blazinaway

    Blazinaway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    11,044
    Likes Received:
    4,321
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe and maybe not, have not seen any sign that ownership will go significantly into the tax to make a big move, seems they are happy with middle of the road mediocrity and counting their profits
     
  7. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    68,298
    Likes Received:
    67,316
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think that's an old narrative at this point. Joe has spoken about it and said for the right talent, money isn't going to be an issue. This isn't the Neil Olshey front office anymore.
     
    BoBoBREWSKI likes this.
  8. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    All of this is true, and very admirable.

    But it's not inconsistent with not caring about the future of the franchise (which is what you quoted). He presumably would be fine with the Blazers having no young players and no future draft picks when he retired (or otherwise left the Blazers). I don't blame him, mind you, but the franchise should consider what will happen after he's gone in a way that he doesn't have to.
     
    STOMP, MickZagger and SlyPokerDog like this.
  9. KingSpeed

    KingSpeed Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    63,193
    Likes Received:
    22,391
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    actor
    Location:
    New York
    I would trade Ant/Sharpe for those 3 guys in their prime. They’re exactly what we need.

    Dame/Arci/Keon
    Rider/Ruben/Cam
    Bonzi/Cam
    Grant/Walker/TWat
    Nurk/Drew
     
    PCmor7 and SlyPokerDog like this.
  10. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,953
    Likes Received:
    145,218
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Caring about young players and draft picks when his tenure in Portland has ended is not a player's job.

    His job is to show up, play hard, be a leader on and off the court, and do what he can on the court to win games.

    When hasn't he done that?

    While I'm not sure exactly what your stance is, I've seen a few say he's hurting the future of the team by not demanding a trade. That's such a weird position.
     
  11. PDXFonz

    PDXFonz I’m listening

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    19,910
    Likes Received:
    16,538
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Reads to me like

    “Make a move or I’m gone because I’m tired of sitting around and watching these other teams make moves and improve while we stay stagnant”

    Couldn’t fault or blame him
     
  12. SharpeScooterShooter

    SharpeScooterShooter SharpeShooter

    Joined:
    May 23, 2022
    Messages:
    6,607
    Likes Received:
    5,420
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Freeloader
    Location:
    Mom’s basement
    Dammit Dame!!! You hate our city!!!!
     
  13. Mr. Robot

    Mr. Robot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2017
    Messages:
    4,482
    Likes Received:
    4,114
    Trophy Points:
    113
    while all of that is true, you didnt understand what i said

    i didnt say he doesnt care about the franchise, i said he doesnt care about the future of this franchise and by trading sharpe or ant (or both) + many 1st round picks for another all-star player would put this franchise in a dark place once dame is gone and as a fan of this franchise, i wouldnt want them to do that... if there is a chance trail blazers can become a contender (not pretender, which is exactly what we would become), id say go for it

    sharpe is a project, he could become an all-star or he could become just a solid player, its impossible to know at this stage (but we can see that the kid is really talented) and im simply unwilling to trade him for a guy like siakam or og anunoby (maybe they can get better player, i dont know, but these two were often mentioned as our potential targets)
     
    Propagandist, Ed O and glazeduck like this.
  14. glazeduck

    glazeduck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,107
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here's what I want to know, because there's a ton of nuance and context that's getting completely ignored in this discussion:
    • Where's the cutoff for the guys who are worth going all in for? To me, anyway, that needs to be above Siakam.

    • Then there's positionality. Obviously another small, ball-dominant guard isn't going to work, so I think the initial list gets cut roughly in half.

    • Then, who's realistically feasible to include on that list? Of the maybe 20-25 guys on the list, you can take off probably half as franchise cornerstones. Of course there are surprises every year, but who are the players who clear the "worth it" point above who might be realistically be available and how does that play out? I could see an argument for Kawhi and Giannis making that list, maybe Bam and/or Butler? Notice these are all Eastern Conf. players?

    • Aggressively, that list is maybe 8-10 names long now. As others have mentioned, there are other teams who have more appealing assets than us, so who, among those maybe-10 names is either not good enough for the OKCs and Houstons to want to pursue, or would actually demand a trade directly to us?

    • From there, the impending sale of the franchise needs to be considered. Certainly a championship contender would be appealing, so would a team with with a bunch of draft picks and young/cheap assets. Hard to see the ownership signing off on a major move that leaves us high and dry if they think it falls short of putting us squarely into the picture.
    Not trying to be pessimistic here, just realistic. Unless Giannis or Embiid decide they want to play with Dame, and specifically Dame, I'm not seeing a lot of viable options for a big "all-in" move.
     
    Ed O likes this.
  15. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    16,395
    Likes Received:
    17,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The fact is an all nba level player gets moved every off season. So you can talk about it being unrealistic but it still happens. We will have enough draft capital and matching contracts to bring in an all nba guy while keeping Dame, Jerami and most likely Shaedon along with a bench that has Cam, Matisse, a miniMLE player and the other guys we'll still have under contract.

    Oh and @Mr. Robot I'm completely willing to see our team leverage our future for a few shots at a title as long as we leverage that future on the right guy or guys that actually give us that opportunity.
     
    Phatguysrule likes this.
  16. GrandpaBlaze

    GrandpaBlaze Predictions Game Master

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    8,084
    Likes Received:
    9,100
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Boise, ID
    At this point in time, from my perspective, everyone except Dame is available.

    Here is my keep/trade tiers:
    Keep: Dame
    Like to Keep Tier 1: Reddish, Thybulle - Logic - great role players that can start and likely can be retained on affordable contracts
    Like to Keep Tier 2: Sharpe, Watford, Walker, Eubanks - Sharpe has high potential, others as capable, inexpensive role players (can fill in but ideally not getting major minutes)
    It all depends: Grant - is he affordable or not - don't want to overpay for a role player - very good at what he does but still a role player
    Would prefer to say Goodbye - Nurk, Ant, Little, Johnson
    Trade bait or just say goodbye - everyone else

    Yes, I excluded Winslow. Played well when he was available but don't want guys who are perpetually unavailable hanging around.

    Earlier I would have had Sharpe in the definitely keep or Tier 1 slots but outside the occasional highlight, I just don't see a lot from the guy to get me excited enough to keep around. Could come back to bite me but if he is key to getting who we need, yep, trade and not hesitate.

    Gramps...
     
    Phatguysrule likes this.
  17. glazeduck

    glazeduck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,107
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It 100% happens, I'm not saying it doesn't. I'm saying the pool of potential players for it to be worth that kind of move and fit all of the subtext of our situation is exceedingly small. I'd guess probably less than 10 with any semblance of a possibility of happening...
     
  18. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I think expecting him to demand a trade is ridiculous. Or hoping for him to do so.

    Dame does everything right as a member of the Blazers and part of the community. As we agree, it's not his job to look towards the franchise's future after he's no longer on the roster. That means that management needs to do its job, and that means that management should not care one iota about his opinions on roster construction, salaries (other than his own), trades, etc.

    That means that management should have to make the tough call of trading him, if and when it makes sense, whether he's demanding a trade or not. Would there be blowback if it's a bad deal? Yes. Would some Blazers fans consider ANY trade a bad deal? Yes.

    But it's their job to make those calls, and sometimes the right decision is not going to be the popular one.
     
    AngryFan, BoBoBREWSKI and STOMP like this.
  19. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    16,395
    Likes Received:
    17,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're probably right, it's always impossible for us to know who could and couldn't be moved or brought in. That said, that means Joe has to make at least one of those 10 happen. I honestly think that if Joe can't get a deal done on draft night that he'll have an honest conversation with Dame and that they will pursue a trade that helps out the team's future and gets Dame on a contender. I don't think that Joe wants that to be his legacy so I am betting that he finds a second all star and probably overpays for him.
     
  20. Haakzilla

    Haakzilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,456
    Likes Received:
    7,471
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    SEOWebDesignLLC.com
    Location:
    Central Oregon
    ...did Dame also mention how he'd be willing to restructure his contract in order to retain such major talent?? :dunno:
     
    STOMP and Natebishop3 like this.

Share This Page