<div class="quote_poster">GameFace Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Who you trying to get with that? The Bulls have more valuable pieces that they are willing to trade, then the Lakers could ever dream of having. Ben Gordon, Tyrus Thomas, the Knicks first round pick, etc. The question is will the price be too high for the Bulls? I don't expect the Wolves to get much for KG after seeing that AI trade go down. Most teams will try and low ball them.</div> Well, I guess you are kinda right. I still think the Lakers CAN offer a better deal, but the question is WILL THEY. I don't think they wanna deal Lamar or Andrew, so you're probably right, the Bulls are willing to trade some pieces and the Lakers aren't.
<div class="quote_poster">egyptianlaker32 Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Luke is a solid player why would u want to trade him</div> To get talent you must give talent Garnett >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walton
<div class="quote_poster">SkiptoMyLue11 Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">The Warriors gave up two expiring contracts I think for Baron Davis.</div> Because nobody wanted Baron Davis's huge contract and his long list of injuries. <div class="quote_poster">Quoting Laker_fan:</div><div class="quote_post">Not true, just ask the Nuggets. They gave away one piece of talent and got a superstar in return.</div> Yeah, and Luke Walton's that one piece of talent (Andre Miller)
