<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jul 29 2008, 12:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I asked about trading his rights and everybody said no!</div> Hoopsworld has no clue, so there is nothing that should change what you have been told.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy @ Jul 29 2008, 02:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jul 29 2008, 01:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy @ Jul 29 2008, 11:18 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Netted @ Jul 29 2008, 10:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Apparently Memphis was offering the Nets choice of either Lowry or Crittenton in a S&T for Nenad. They are obviously shopping one of them. If you had a choice of either one who would you choose?</div> I don't know anything about Crittenden. Lowry I think is really short, plays tenacious defense, and has not much offensive game. I'd probably choose to keep the rights to Nenad. Neither Lowry or Crittenden would ever be anything more than a ten-minute-a-night backup, and I'm not sure how much of an upgrade either would be over Hodge. </div> Both Lowry and Crit are significantly better than Hodge and are much more than ten minute per game backups. Then Nets have very few players (2 to be precise) that are more talented than them in the backcourt. </div> they are unlikely to receive more than ten minutes a night on the Nets the way they are currently constructed </div> Sorry Dumpy, but you are completely off base. Lowry is a better PG than Dooling and a defensive monster. Frank would love him and play him a lot. Crit can play the 1, 2 or 3 and is more talented than CDR, Anderson and Hayes.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MarionBarberThe4th @ Jul 29 2008, 03:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>So can we trade Krstics rights tomorrow for a TE and future pick?</div> No. The only right the Nets have is the right of first refusal. That isn't something that can be traded.
Lowry would have been the perfect backup PG for this team moving forward. Him and Dooling would make a formidable second string backcourt and Lowry would be the pure PG we need off the bench to replace what we thought we had in Williams since Harris is more of a shoot-first PG. Crittenton has more potential and is more of a risk who could potentially yield higher rewards, but with Harris already aboard we wouldnt really be in a position where gambling on potential would be the most beneficial thing to do when a sure thing like Lowry is the other possibility.
