Sandusky was a serial rapist. A clear and present danger if free in society. As far as I know, the guy in the OP had sexual encounters with just the one girl. I think that's the distinction. The victim card (from jlprk's post):
I think calling people rape apologists when they clearly do not self identify as rape apologists is a personal insult. Sent from my banana using Tapatalk 4
Wait? I'm confused. So who is the rape apologist? It seems like you're condoning the girl's actions, crandc. From the story, it sounds like one girl was 18 and the other 14. As an accountant, I can count that that's more than the 3 years rule/law you mentioned. So she clearly is in violation of the law.
Sorry to break this to you, but it's not the Blue Lagoon, it's a 14 year old and the older chick was ordered to stay away and refused. So the parents did what theyhad to do to protect their daughter. If their daughter was 17 then I would agree with you.