Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Rok @ Apr 5 2006, 03:29 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Um no, you did. And that's why I made my comment about Waqas/Dirk - Mavsfan/Daniels. Then you brought up Stackhouse for no reason. Go and look at the thread, and read your comment and see how out of place that was.</div>who am i a homer for then?? :HAHAHA:
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Your post was out of place also so we both put random thoughts. You out of nowhere compare me to Daniels and Waqas to Dirk.</div>My post was directed towards your comment, see the quote? So that whole comparison led you to bring Stackhouse into the thread? Makes sense.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>who am i a homer for then??</div>Jean St. Oliver.
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again Well like I said Daniels is fighting for minutes in the playoffs and Stackhouse is a part of Daniels getting minutes in the playoffs. Van Horn getting injured will allow Daniels to possibly get more minutes.
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Well like I said Daniels is fighting for minutes in the playoffs and Stackhouse is a part of Daniels getting minutes in the playoffs. Van Horn getting injured will allow Daniels to possibly get more minutes.</div>The way you worded it made it seem like great Van Horn's out, this will get Daniels in the rotation. Also, I don't see how Stack bashing was still part of this thread but back on topic.
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again db.com is into Stackhouse bashing and I have taken it lightly. He does deserve to be called out by Avery though. Ok so I show favoritism and talk about Daniels a lot. So what? It is the most debated topic in the mavs forums. Daniels or Stackhouse?
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again Yeah, but let's just say both guys are invaluable. These are the consistent/good players on the bench (proven ones, at least):-Marquis Daniels-Keith Van Horn-Jerry Stackhouse-Erick DampierDo you think people would call Dallas the deepest bench withOUT Stack? Apparently no.
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>db.com is into Stackhouse bashing and I have taken it lightly.</div>Those guys are kneejerkers and why are you associating yourself with those type of fans? Every loss on that board, turns out 5-6 topics on why were doomed. Then look at when we win, nothing. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Ok so I show favoritism and talk about Daniels a lot. So what? It is the most debated topic in the mavs forums. Daniels or Stackhouse?</div>Most debated huh? You seem to be the only one interested in it.
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again The bench I look at from best to worse is HarrisDampierDaniels StackhousePowell. That is when Griffin gets back. They still are 9 men deep without Stackhouse and that is the perfect amount for the playoffs.
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>The bench I look at from best to worse is HarrisDampierDaniels StackhousePowell. That is when Griffin gets back. They still are 9 men deep without Stackhouse and that is the perfect amount for the playoffs.</div>Sorry to burst your bubble but Stackhouse will be in the playoff rotation. Just had to add that without Stack didn't you?
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again It's either without Stackhouse or without Daniels so that is why I am debating the Daniels vs. Stackhouse. I guess you know Avery so well huh?
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>It's either without Stackhouse or without Daniels so that is why I am debating the Daniels vs. Stackhouse. I guess you know Avery so well huh?</div>Do you really expect Stack not to play? That's a joke. I expect both to play minutes. So I see no debate.I have a wager for Mavsfan, if Stack is not part of the rotation in the playoffs, I leave. If Stackhouse is part of the rotation, you sport a I am a Homer sig that I make.
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Rok @ Apr 5 2006, 04:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Do you really expect Stack not to play? That's a joke. I expect both to play minutes. So I see no debate.</div>as do i, except i think stack will get more and prolly more "valuable" minutes than daniels. i'm talking valuable as in the 4th qtr.
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>as do i, except i think stack will get more and prolly more "valuable" minutes than daniels. i'm talking valuable as in the 4th qtr.</div>Mavsfan will jump off a cliff rather then believe that. But you basically took the words out of my mouth.
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again After watching how Stackhouse got selfish in the playoffs last year I've really hoped that we traded him. It sucks that because of Stackhouse at one point in his career was a high scorer gets minutes by default while Daniels has to play 100 times better to get minutes. I just don't want to see this team lose for the same reasons. If we depend on Stackhouse, this team will lose.
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again Let's take a look at Howard's game last night, lolz. This IS about Howard [the topic], isn't it?Offense: A-His first half was VERY nice, but in the third quarter he could've taken some wiser shots or pass it up.Scoring: B+Most of his attempts (9-19 overall) were nice, but some were just plain horrible. I saw Terry or Dirk open MANY times throughout out the game.Passing: BHe DID have four assists, but could've had 10. Horrible court vision.Post-Game: FAvery Johnson was too overrated about Josh Howard. He should've given Dirk credit to getting fouls on Artest.
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again Post game F? Howard doesn't need a post game since he is slashing through the other players. It would be like telling Parker to post up players. When you are that fast, you don't need to post up.
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again Oh wait, that was meant for Avery. I wish he could take more bout Mbenga and stuff.
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again Stop dissing Avery if you want some respect around here. Avery>>>>>Don Nelson
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Stop dissing Avery if you want some respect around here. Avery>>>>>Don Nelson</div> :HAHAHA: Just be quiet from now on. Nelson is a Hall of Fame coach, Avery is not. Avery right now is lucky to have stepped in with the team he had. I ain't dissing his coaching, but that comment was dumb.
Re: Mavs' Howard may fill in again Nelson doesn't deserve to be a hall of fame coach. So what if he coached a ton of years. His record as a coach isn't that great.
